@inproceedings{hu-walker-2017-inferring,
title = "Inferring Narrative Causality between Event Pairs in Films",
author = "Hu, Zhichao and
Walker, Marilyn",
editor = "Jokinen, Kristiina and
Stede, Manfred and
DeVault, David and
Louis, Annie",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 18th Annual {SIG}dial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue",
month = aug,
year = "2017",
address = {Saarbr{\"u}cken, Germany},
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W17-5540",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W17-5540",
pages = "342--351",
abstract = "To understand narrative, humans draw inferences about the underlying relations between narrative events. Cognitive theories of narrative understanding define these inferences as four different types of causality, that include pairs of events A, B where A physically causes B (X drop, X break), to pairs of events where A causes emotional state B (Y saw X, Y felt fear). Previous work on learning narrative relations from text has either focused on {``}strict{''} physical causality, or has been vague about what relation is being learned. This paper learns pairs of causal events from a corpus of film scene descriptions which are action rich and tend to be told in chronological order. We show that event pairs induced using our methods are of high quality and are judged to have a stronger causal relation than event pairs from Rel-Grams.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="hu-walker-2017-inferring">
<titleInfo>
<title>Inferring Narrative Causality between Event Pairs in Films</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Zhichao</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Marilyn</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Walker</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2017-08</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 18th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kristiina</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jokinen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Manfred</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Stede</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">David</namePart>
<namePart type="family">DeVault</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Annie</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Louis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Saarbrücken, Germany</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>To understand narrative, humans draw inferences about the underlying relations between narrative events. Cognitive theories of narrative understanding define these inferences as four different types of causality, that include pairs of events A, B where A physically causes B (X drop, X break), to pairs of events where A causes emotional state B (Y saw X, Y felt fear). Previous work on learning narrative relations from text has either focused on “strict” physical causality, or has been vague about what relation is being learned. This paper learns pairs of causal events from a corpus of film scene descriptions which are action rich and tend to be told in chronological order. We show that event pairs induced using our methods are of high quality and are judged to have a stronger causal relation than event pairs from Rel-Grams.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">hu-walker-2017-inferring</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W17-5540</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W17-5540</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2017-08</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>342</start>
<end>351</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Inferring Narrative Causality between Event Pairs in Films
%A Hu, Zhichao
%A Walker, Marilyn
%Y Jokinen, Kristiina
%Y Stede, Manfred
%Y DeVault, David
%Y Louis, Annie
%S Proceedings of the 18th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue
%D 2017
%8 August
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Saarbrücken, Germany
%F hu-walker-2017-inferring
%X To understand narrative, humans draw inferences about the underlying relations between narrative events. Cognitive theories of narrative understanding define these inferences as four different types of causality, that include pairs of events A, B where A physically causes B (X drop, X break), to pairs of events where A causes emotional state B (Y saw X, Y felt fear). Previous work on learning narrative relations from text has either focused on “strict” physical causality, or has been vague about what relation is being learned. This paper learns pairs of causal events from a corpus of film scene descriptions which are action rich and tend to be told in chronological order. We show that event pairs induced using our methods are of high quality and are judged to have a stronger causal relation than event pairs from Rel-Grams.
%R 10.18653/v1/W17-5540
%U https://aclanthology.org/W17-5540
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-5540
%P 342-351
Markdown (Informal)
[Inferring Narrative Causality between Event Pairs in Films](https://aclanthology.org/W17-5540) (Hu & Walker, SIGDIAL 2017)
ACL