Abstract
The requirement for the huge bandwidth-demanding applications has urged researchers to develop improved data pipes that could allow smooth data flow. Revolutionary growth has been witnessed in the domain of the telecommunication industry, which has opened new horizons for connectivity among humans and devices alike especially, in the era of 5G. The advancement from TDM multiplexed signal transmitted over copper wire to the flexible and smart grid along with ethernet passive optical networks or space division multiplexed over optic fiber introducing enormous speed in 100 of Gbps has contributed to the fastest communication. The heterogeneous structure and network complexity require the automating of telecommunication services which have been assisted with the incorporation of machine learning and artificial intelligence, highlighting the new era of communication with the reliability and fastest accessibility. This survey reports the evolution of optical carrier generations and advancement in networks along with the fundamental achievements to comprehend the supportive competition while highlighting the gaps and challenges for future work.
-
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Wall, A, Gilsenan, J, Jatopa, LLC. Mobile communications device case. U.S. patent application 29/498,728; 2016.Search in Google Scholar
2. Sinha, K, Ghosh, SC, Sinha, BP. Wireless networks and mobile computing. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press; 2016.Search in Google Scholar
3. Riggs, W, Gordon, K. How is mobile technology changing city planning? Developing a taxonomy for the future. Environ Plann Urban Anal City Sci 2017;44:100–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515610337.Search in Google Scholar
4. Aggarwal, R. Wireless communication: evolution and advance wireless communication. CSI Transactions IT 2018;4:25–30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20180402.12.Search in Google Scholar
5. Wang, S, Ran, C. Rethinking cellular network planning and optimization. IEEE Wireless Commun 2016;23:118–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/mwc.2016.7462493.Search in Google Scholar
6. Devra, S, Sharma, A. GSM architecture & channels: review study. In: Second international conference on innovative trends in electronics engineering (ICITEE2).Search in Google Scholar
7. Bendaoud, F. Management of joint radio resources in heterogeneous networks beyond 3G [Doctoral dissertation]; 2018.Search in Google Scholar
8. Striccoli, D, Piro, G, Boggia, G. Multicast and broadcast services over mobile networks: a survey on standardized approaches and scientific outcomes. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 2018;21:1020–63.Search in Google Scholar
9. Hur, J, Vazny, R, Dimpflmaier, RW, Apple Inc. Reconfigurable electrical balance duplexer (EBD) supporting frequency division duplex (FDD) and time division duplex (TDD). U.S. patent application 16/145,857; 2020.Search in Google Scholar
10. Kashaf, A, Tiwana, MI, Usman, I, Tiwana, MI. Self-organizing inter-cell interference coordination in 4G and beyond networks using genetic algorithms. Automatika: časopis za automatiku, mjerenje, elektroniku, računarstvo i komunikacije 2017;58:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00051144.2017.1337394.Search in Google Scholar
11. Xue, CD, Zhang, XY, Cao, YF, Hou, Z, Ding, CF. MIMO antenna using hybrid electric and magnetic coupling for isolation enhancement. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 2017;65:5162–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/tap.2017.2738033.Search in Google Scholar
12. Mardani, MR, Mohebi, S, Maham, B, Bennis, M. Delay-sensitive resource allocation for relay-aided M2M communication over LTE-advanced networks. In: 2017 IEEE symposium on computers and communications (ISCC). IEEE, Heraklion, Greece; 2017:1033–8 pp.Search in Google Scholar
13. Hicham, M, Abghour, N, Ouzzif, M. Device-to-device (D2D) communication under LTE-advanced networks. Int J Wireless Mobile Network 2016;8. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijwmn.2016.8102.Search in Google Scholar
14. Liu, J, Kato, N, Ma, J, Kadowaki, N. Device-to-device communication in LTE-advanced networks: a survey. IEEE Communi Surv Tutorials 2014;17:1923–40.Search in Google Scholar
15. Giordani, M, Polese, M, Mezzavilla, M, Rangan, S, Zorzi, M. Towards 6G Networks: use cases and technologies. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.12216; 2019.Search in Google Scholar
16. David, K, Berndt, H. 6G vision and requirements: is there any need for beyond 5G? IEEE Veh Technol Mag 2018;13:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/mvt.2018.2848498.Search in Google Scholar
17. Yang, P, Xiao, Y, Xiao, M, Li, S. 6G wireless communications: vision and potential techniques. IEEE Network 2019;33:70–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/mnet.2019.1800418.Search in Google Scholar
18. Strinati, EC, Barbarossa, S, Gonzalez-Jimenez, JL, Kténas, D, Cassiau, N, Dehos, C. 6G: the next frontier. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.03239; 2019.Search in Google Scholar
19. Davis, G. 2020: life with 50 billion connected devices. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on consumer electronics (ICCE). IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, USA; 2018:1–1 pp.Search in Google Scholar
20. Bull, P, Austin, R, Popov, E, Sharma, M, Watson, R. Flow based security for IoT devices using an SDN gateway. In: 2016 IEEE 4th international conference on future internet of things and cloud (FiCloud). IEEE, Vienna, Austria; 2016:157–63 pp.Search in Google Scholar
21. Saadi, M, Wuttisittikulkij, L. Visible light communication–the journey so far. J Opt Commun 2019;40:447–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2017-0107.Search in Google Scholar
22. Saadi, M, Ahmad, T, Kamran Saleem, M, Wuttisittikulkij, L. Visible light communication–an architectural perspective on the applications and data rate improvement strategies. Trans Emerg Telecommun Technol 2019;30:e3436. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.3436.Search in Google Scholar
23. Saadi, M, Wattisuttikulkij, L, Zhao, Y, Sangwongngam, P. Visible light communication: opportunities, challenges and channel models. Int J Electron Inf 2013;2:1–11.Search in Google Scholar
24. Amari, A, Dobre, OA, Venkatesan, R, Kumar, OS, Ciblat, P, Jaouën, Y. A survey on fiber nonlinearity compensation for 400 Gb/s and beyond optical communication systems. IEEE Commun Surve Tutorials 2017;19:3097–113. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2017.2719958.Search in Google Scholar
25. Chau, TT, Kao, KC. Optical emission spectra of microwave oxygen plasmas and fabrication of SiO2 films. J Vac Sci Technol B 1996;14:527–32. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.588424.Search in Google Scholar
26. Willner, AE. Several historical articles in this millennium issue cover the development of lasers and optical fibers. IEEE J Sel Top Quant Electron 2000;6:827–1513.Search in Google Scholar
27. Kilper, DC, Peyghambarian, N. Changing evolution of optical communication systems at the network edges. Appl Optic 2020;59:G209–18. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.394119.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Marom, DM, Blau, M. Switching solutions for WDM-SDM optical networks. IEEE Commun Mag 2015;53:60–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2015.7045392.Search in Google Scholar
29. Zhou, X, Yu, J, Huang, MF, Shao, Y, Wang, T, Nelson, L, et al.. 64-Tb/s, 8 b/s/Hz, PDM-36QAM transmission over 320 km using both pre-and post-transmission digital signal processing. J Lightwave Technol 2011;29:571–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2011.2105856.Search in Google Scholar
30. Horvath, T, Munster, P, Oujezsky, V, Bao, NH. Passive optical networks progress: a tutorial. Electronics 2020;9:1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9071081.Search in Google Scholar
31. Obite, F, Jaja, ET, Ijeomah, G, Jahun, KI. The evolution of ethernet passive optical network (EPON) and future trends. Optik 2018;167:103–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.03.119.Search in Google Scholar
32. Zhang, D, Liu, D, Wu, X, Nesset, D. Progress of ITU-T higher speed passive optical network (50G-PON) standardization. J Opt Commun Netw 2020;12:D99–D108. https://doi.org/10.1364/jocn.391830.Search in Google Scholar
33. Diaa, M, Shalaby, M, Mohamed, AA, Hassan, KM, Mokhtar, AM. Undetectable tapping methods for gigabit passive optical network (GPON). In: 2018 14th international computer engineering conference (ICENCO). IEEE, Cairo, Egypt; 2018:52–7 pp.Search in Google Scholar
34. Thangappan, T, Therese, B, Adi, S, Gadda, SS. Review on dynamic bandwidth allocation of GPON and EPON. J Electron Sci Technol 2020:100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlest.2020.100044.Search in Google Scholar
35. Effenberger, FJ. PON standardisation status and future prospects. In: 2019 45th European conference on optical communication (ECOC). IET, Dublin, Ireland; 2019:1–3 pp.Search in Google Scholar
36. Romero, MA. Passive optical networks: present status and future outlook. In: 2017 SBMO/IEEE MTT-S international microwave and optoelectronics conference (IMOC). IEEE, Aguas de Lindoia, Brazil; 2017:1–5 pp.Search in Google Scholar
37. Steiner, W, Bauer, G, Hall, B, Paulitsch, M. Time-triggered ethernet. In: Time-triggered communication. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA; 2018:209–48 pp.Search in Google Scholar
38. Wey, JS. The outlook for PON standardization: a tutorial. J Lightwave Technol 2020;38:31–42.Search in Google Scholar
39. Torres‐Company, V, Weiner, AM. Optical frequency comb technology for ultra‐broadband radio‐frequency photonics. Laser Photon Rev 2014;8:368–93.Search in Google Scholar
40. Jinno, M. Elastic optical networking: roles and benefits in beyond 100-Gb/s era. J Lightwave Technol 2016;35:1116–24.Search in Google Scholar
41. Behera, S, Deb, A, Das, G, Mukherjee, B. Impairment aware routing, bit loading, and spectrum allocation in elastic optical networks. J Lightwave Technol 2019;37:3009–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2019.2909125.Search in Google Scholar
42. Tomkos, I, Azodolmolky, S, Sole-Pareta, J, Careglio, D, Palkopoulou, E. A tutorial on the flexible optical networking paradigm: state of the art, trends, and research challenges. Proc IEEE 2014;102:1317–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2014.2324652.Search in Google Scholar
43. ITU. G.694.1:spectral grids for WDM applications: DWDM frequency grid. Geneva, Switzerland: Int. Telecommun. Union; 2012.Search in Google Scholar
44. Zou, S, Huawei Technologies Co Ltd. System, device and method for transporting signals through passive optical network. U.S. patent 7,949,255; 2011.Search in Google Scholar
45. Sambo, N, Castoldi, P, D’Errico, A, Riccardi, E, Pagano, A, Moreolo, MS, et al.. Next generation sliceable bandwidth variable transponders. IEEE Commun Mag 2015;53:163–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2015.7045405.Search in Google Scholar
46. Sambo, N, Meloni, G, Paolucci, F, Cugini, F, Secondini, M, Fresi, F, et al.. Programmable transponder, code and differentiated filter configuration in elastic optical networks. J Lightwave Technol 2014;32:2079–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2014.2319859.Search in Google Scholar
47. Iyer, S, Singh, SP. Effect of channel spacing on the design of mixed line rate optical wavelength division multiplexed networks. J Opt Commun 2019;40:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2016-0127.Search in Google Scholar
48. Haiyi, Z, Wenyu, Z, Bingbing, W. Considerations on transport networks technologies evolution. China Commun 2013;10:7–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/cc.2013.6506924.Search in Google Scholar
49. AL-Tarawneh, L, Taebi, S. Dynamic adaptation of bandwidth granularity for multipath routing in elastic optical OFDM networks. In: Conference on laser and electro-optics (CLEO). IEEE, San Jose, CA; 2015:10–5 pp.Search in Google Scholar
50. AL-Tarawneh, L, Taebi, S. Linear dynamic adaptation of the BW granularity allocation for elastic optical OFDM networks. In: International symposium on performance evaluation of computer and telecommunication systems (SPECTS). IEEE, Chicago, IL; 2015:1–7 pp.Search in Google Scholar
51. AL-Tarawneh, L, Taebi, S. Minimizing blocking probability in elastic optical networks by varying the minimum BW granularity based on optical path fragmentation, photonics. J Opt Networks Commun 2017;4:20. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics4020020.Search in Google Scholar
52. Imran, M, Anandarajah, PM, Kaszubowska-Anandarajah, A, Sambo, N, Potí, L. A survey of optical carrier generation techniques for terabit capacity elastic optical networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 2017;20:211–63.Search in Google Scholar
53. Collings, B. New devices enabling software-defined optical networks. IEEE Commun Mag 2013;51:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2013.6476867.Search in Google Scholar
54. Kuo, BPP, Myslivets, E, Ataie, V, Temprana, EG, Alic, N, Radic, S. Wideband parametric frequency comb as coherent optical carrier. J Lightwave Technol 2013;31:3414–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2013.2279540.Search in Google Scholar
55. Yi, X, Fontaine, NK, Scott, RP, Yoo, SB. Tb/s coherent optical OFDM systems enabled by optical frequency combs. J Lightwave Technol 2010;28:2054–61.Search in Google Scholar
56. Sakamoto, T, Lu, GW, Kawanishi, T. Filter-less multi-tone coherent orthogonal detection for multi-channel reception of super-channel/OFDM signals. In: Optical fiber communication conference. Optical Society of America, Anaheim, California USA; 2013:JTh2A–47 pp.Search in Google Scholar
57. Meloni, G, Rahman, T, Napoli, A, Fresi, F, Sambo, N, D’Errico, A, et al.. Experimental comparison of transmission performance for Nyquist WDM and time–frequency packing. J Lightwave Technol 2015;33:5261–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2015.2500608.Search in Google Scholar
58. Chandrasekhar, S, Liu, X. OFDM based superchannel transmission technology. J Lightwave Technol 2012;30:3816–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2012.2210861.Search in Google Scholar
59. Tran, TT, Song, M, Seo, DS. Highly flat optical comb generation based on DP-MZM and phase modulators. Electron Lett 2018;55:43–5.Search in Google Scholar
60. Masri, NMH, Uddin, MR, Kui, LF. Dense wavelength division multiplexer based on microring resonators. In: 2018 IEEE student conference on research and development (SCOReD). IEEE, Selangor, Malaysia; 2018:1–4 pp.Search in Google Scholar
61. Morozov, OG, IL’in, GI, Morozov, GA, Nureev, II, Misbakhov, RS. External amplitude-phase modulation of laser radiation for generation of microwave frequency carriers and optical poly-harmonic signals: an overview. In: Optical technologies for telecommunications 2015, vol 9807. International Society for Optics and Photonics, Bellingham, Washington USA; 2016:980711 p.Search in Google Scholar
62. Kumar, C, Kumar, G. Impact of hybrid optical amplifier for multitudinous segment for super-dense multiplexing system. Appl Phys A 2019;125:708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-019-3011-0.Search in Google Scholar
63. Doerr, C, Acacia Communications Inc. Modulation-based integrated broadband optical isolator with improved isolation. U.S. patent 9,823,496; 2017.Search in Google Scholar
64. Dou, Y, Zhang, H, Yao, M. Improvement of flatness of optical frequency comb based on nonlinear effect of intensity modulator. Opt Lett 2011;36:2749–51. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.36.002749.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
65. Metcalf, AJ, Torres-Company, V, Leaird, DE, Weiner, AM. High-power broadly tunable electrooptic frequency comb generator. IEEE J Sel Top Quant Electron 2013;19:231–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstqe.2013.2268384.Search in Google Scholar
66. Wei, R, Yan, J, Peng, Y, Yao, X, Bai, M, Zheng, Z. Optical frequency comb generation based on electro-optical modulation with high-order harmonic of a sine RF signal. Optic Commun 2013;291:269–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2012.10.076.Search in Google Scholar
67. Xie, Z, Li, S, Yan, H, Xiao, X, Xue, X, Zheng, X, et al.. Tunable ultraflat optical frequency comb generator based on optoelectronic oscillator using dual-parallel Mach–Zehnder modulator. Opt Eng 2017;56:066115. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.56.6.066115.Search in Google Scholar
68. Delmade, A, Krstić, M, Browning, C, Crnjanski, J, Gvozdić, D, Barry, L. Power efficient optical frequency comb generation using laser gain switching and dual-drive Mach-Zehnder modulator. Optic Express 2019;27:24135–46. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.27.024135.Search in Google Scholar
69. Mishra, AK, Tomkos, I. A novel cost-effective combline generation and cross-talk mitigation in optical OFDM signal using optical iFFT circuits. In: 2011 18th international conference on telecommunications. IEEE, Ayia Napa, Cyprus; 2011:107–12 pp.Search in Google Scholar
70. Luo, J, Dorren, H, Calabretta, N. WDM optical interconnect enabled by optical frequency comb based on dual-drive modulator. In: 2018 Photonics in switching and computing (PSC). IEEE, Limassol, Cyprus; 2018:1–3 pp.Search in Google Scholar
71. Weimann, C, Schindler, PC, Palmer, R, Wolf, S, Bekele, D, Korn, D, et al.. Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) frequency comb sources for terabit/s data transmission. Optic Express 2014;22:3629–37. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.22.003629.Search in Google Scholar
72. Slavík, R, Farwell, SG, Wale, MJ, Richardson, DJ. Compact optical comb generator using InP tunable laser and push-pull modulator. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2014;27:217–20.Search in Google Scholar
73. Tabares, JA, Ghasemi, S, Velásquez, JC, Prat, J. Coherent ultra-dense WDM-PON enabled by complexity-reduced digital transceivers. J Lightwave Technol 2019;38:1305–13.Search in Google Scholar
74. Yamamoto, S, Saito, K, Hamaoka, F, Matsuda, T, Naka, A, Maeda, H. Characteristics investigation of high-speed multi-carrier transmission using MIMO-based crosstalk compensation in homodyne detection scheme. J Lightwave Technol 2016;34:2824–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2016.2543241.Search in Google Scholar
75. Soto, MA, Alem, M, Shoaie, MA, Vedadi, A, Brès, CS, Thévenaz, L, et al.. Optical sinc-shaped Nyquist pulses of exceptional quality. Nat Commun 2013;4:2898. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3898.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
76. Preussler, S, Wenzel, N, Schneider, T. Flat, rectangular frequency comb generation with tunable bandwidth and frequency spacing. Opt Lett 2014;39:1637–40. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.39.001637.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
77. Imran, M, Fresi, F, Meloni, G, Potì, L. 12.5 GHz–100 GHz tunable spacing optical carrier source for flexgrid bandwidth variable transponders. In: 2015 international conference on optical network design and modeling (ONDM). IEEE, Pisa, Italy; 2015:157–61 pp.Search in Google Scholar
78. Tran, TT, Song, M, Song, M, Seo, D. Highly flat optical frequency comb generation based on pulse carving and sinusoidal phase modulation. Opt Eng 2019;58:076103. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.58.7.076103.Search in Google Scholar
79. Zhang, J, Yu, J, Tao, L, Fang, Y, Wang, Y, Shao, Y, et al.. Generation of coherent and frequency-lock optical subcarriers by cascading phase modulators driven by sinusoidal sources. J Lightwave Technol 2012;30:3911–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2012.2203096.Search in Google Scholar
80. Huang, YK, Huang, MF, Ip, E, Mateo, E, Ji, PN, Qian, D, et al.. High-capacity fiber field trial using terabit/s all-optical OFDM superchannels with DP-QPSK and DP-8QAM/DP-QPSK modulation. J Lightwave Technol 2013;31:546–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2012.2226384.Search in Google Scholar
81. Huang, M-F, Tanaka, A, Ip, E, Huang, Y-K, Qian, D, Zhang, Y, et al.. Terabit/s Nyquist superchannels in high capacity fiber field trials using DP-16QAM and DP-8QAM modulation formats. J Lightwave Technol 2014;32:776–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2013.2280396.Search in Google Scholar
82. Nakagawa, Y, Mizumoto, Y, Kato, T, Kobatake, T, Itobe, H, Kakinuma, Y, et al.. Dispersion tailoring of a crystalline whispering gallery mode microcavity for a wide-spanning optical Kerr frequency comb. JOSA B 2016;33:1913–20. https://doi.org/10.1364/josab.33.001913.Search in Google Scholar
83. Savchenkov, AA, Ilchenko, VS, Matsko, AB, Maleki, L. Integrated mid-IR frequency combs. In: Mid-infrared coherent sources. Optical Society of America, Bellingham, Washington USA; 2016:MM1C–3 pp.Search in Google Scholar
84. Levy, JS, Gondarenko, A, Foster, MA, Turner-Foster, AC, Gaeta, AL, Lipson, M. CMOS-compatible multiple-wavelength oscillator for on-chip optical interconnects. Nat Photon 2010;4:37. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.259.Search in Google Scholar
85. Levy, JS, Saha, K, Okawachi, Y, Foster, MA, Gaeta, AL, Lipson, M. High-performance silicon-nitride-based multiple-wavelength source. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2012;24:1375–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/lpt.2012.2204245.Search in Google Scholar
86. Pfeifle, J, Brasch, V, Lauermann, M, Yu, Y, Wegner, D, Herr, T, et al.. Coherent terabit communications with microresonator Kerr frequency combs. Nat Photon 2014;8:375. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.57.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
87. Xuan, Y, Liu, Y, Xue, X, Wang, PH, Wang, J, Niu, B, et al.. High-Q silicon nitride microresonator for low power frequency comb initiation at normal dispersion regime. In: CLEO: Science and Innovations. Optical Society of America, Bellingham, Washington USA; 2015:STu1I–6 pp.Search in Google Scholar
88. Sillard, P. New fibers for ultra-high capacity transport. Opt Fiber Technol 2011;17:495–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2011.07.002.Search in Google Scholar
89. Singh, SP, Sengar, S, Bajpai, R, Iyer, S. Next-generation variable-line-rate optical WDM networks: issues and challenges. J Opt Commun 2013;34:331–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2013-0050.Search in Google Scholar
90. Trinel, JB, Le Cocq, G, Andresen, ER, Quiquempois, Y, Bigot, L. Latest results and future perspectives on few-mode erbium doped fiber amplifiers. Opt Fiber Technol 2017;35:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2016.09.004.Search in Google Scholar
91. Iyer, S, Singh, SP. Spectral and power efficiency investigation in single-and multi-line-rate optical wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) networks. Photonic Netw Commun 2017;33:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-016-0618-3.Search in Google Scholar
92. Zhong, K, Zhou, X, Gui, T, Tao, L, Gao, Y, Chen, W, et al.. Experimental study of PAM-4, CAP-16, and DMT for 100 Gb/s short reach optical transmission systems. Optic Express 2015;23:1176–89. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.001176.Search in Google Scholar
93. Xu, X, Zhou, E, Liu, GN, Zuo, T, Zhong, Q, Zhang, L, et al.. Advanced modulation formats for 400-Gbps short-reach optical inter-connection. Optic Express 2015;23:492–500. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.000492.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
94. Absil, PP, Verheyen, P, De Heyn, P, Pantouvaki, M, Lepage, G, De Coster, J., et al.. Silicon photonics integrated circuits: a manufacturing platform for high density, low power optical I/O’s. Optic Express 2015;23:9369–78. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.009369.Search in Google Scholar
95. Zhu, Z, Zhong, S, Chen, L, Chen, K. Fully programmable and scalable optical switching fabric for petabyte data center. Optic Express 2015;23:3563–80. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.003563.Search in Google Scholar
96. Ramachandran, S, Gregg, P, Kristensen, P, Golowich, SE. On the scalability of ring fiber designs for OAM multiplexing. Optic Express 2015;23:3721–30. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.003721.Search in Google Scholar
97. Yu, S. Potentials and challenges of using orbital angular momentum communications in optical interconnects. Optic Express 2015;23:3075–87. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.003075.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
98. Tsonev, D, Videv, S, Haas, H. Towards a 100 Gb/s visible light wireless access network. Optic Express 2015;23:1627–37. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.001627.Search in Google Scholar
99. Oda, S, Saito, T, Nishimura, K. Optical network technologies for enabling 5G. Fujitsu Sci Tech J 2019;55.Search in Google Scholar
100. Ji, Y, Zhang, J, Xiao, Y, Liu, Z. 5G flexible optical transport networks with large-capacity, low-latency and high-efficiency. China Commun 2019;16:19–32.Search in Google Scholar
101. Mata, J, De Miguel, I, Duran, RJ, Merayo, N, Singh, SK, Jukan, A, et al. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods in optical networks: a comprehensive survey Opt Switch Netw 2018;28:43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osn.2017.12.006.Search in Google Scholar
102. Musumeci, F, Rottondi, C, Nag, A, Macaluso, I, Zibar, D, Ruffini, M, et al.. An overview on application of machine learning techniques in optical networks. IEEE Communi Surv Tutorials 2018;21:1383–408.Search in Google Scholar
103. Singh, SP, Iyer, S, Kar, S, Jain, VK. Study on mitigation of transmission impairments and issues and challenges with PLIA-RWA in optical WDM networks. J Opt Commun 2012;33:83–101. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2012-0015.Search in Google Scholar
104. Wang, S, Li, D, Geng, J, Gu, Y, Cheng, Y. Impact of network topology on the performance of DML: theoretical analysis and practical factors. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE conference on computer communications. IEEE, Paris, France; 2019:1729–37 pp.Search in Google Scholar
105. Ghosh, J. Interrelationship between energy efficiency and spectral efficiency in cognitive femtocell networks: a survey. Pervasive Mob Comput 2019;59:101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2019.101066.Search in Google Scholar
106. ElSawy, H, Hossain, E, Haenggi, M. Stochastic geometry for modeling, analysis, and design of multi-tier and cognitive cellular wireless networks: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 2013;15:996–1019. https://doi.org/10.1109/surv.2013.052213.00000.Search in Google Scholar
107. Le, LT, Nguyen, H, Dou, J, Zhou, J. A comparative study of PSO-ANN, GA-ANN, ICA-ANN, and ABC-ANN in estimating the heating load of buildings’ energy efficiency for smart city planning. Appl Sci 2019;9:2630. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9132630.Search in Google Scholar
108. Hasan, M, Hossain, E, Niyato, D. Random access for machine-to-machine communication in LTE-advanced networks: issues and approaches. IEEE Commun Mag 2013;51:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2013.6525600.Search in Google Scholar
109. Laya, A, Alonso, L, Alonso-Zarate, J. Is the random access channel of LTE and LTE-A suitable for M2M communications? A survey of alternatives. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 2013;16:4–16.Search in Google Scholar
110. Anastasopoulos, MP, Tzanakaki, A, Rofoee, BR, Peng, S, Yan, Y, Simeonidou, D, et al.. Optical wireless network convergence in support of energy-efficient mobile cloud services. Photonic Netw Commun 2015;29:269–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-015-0494-2.Search in Google Scholar
111. Hasan, Z, Boostanimehr, H, Bhargava, VK. Green cellular networks: A survey, some research issues and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:1108.5493; 2011.Search in Google Scholar
112. Ji, Y, Gu, R, Yang, Z, Li, J, Li, H, Zhang, M. Artificial intelligence-driven autonomous optical networks: 3S architecture and key technologies. Inf Sci 2020;63:1–160301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-2871-2.Search in Google Scholar
113. Giacoumidis, E, Lin, Y, Blott, M, Barry, LP. Real-time machine learning-based fiber-induced nonlinearity compensation in energy-efficient coherent optical networks. APL Photonics 2020;5:041301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5140609.Search in Google Scholar
114. Panayiotou, T, Savva, G, Tomkos, I, Ellinas, G. Decentralizing machine-learning-based QoT estimation for sliceable optical networks. IEEE/OSA J Opt Commun Netw 2020;12:146–62. https://doi.org/10.1364/jocn.387853.Search in Google Scholar
115. Khan, I, Bilal, M, Curri, V. Assessment of cross-train machine learning techniques for QoT-estimation in agnostic optical networks. OSA Continuum 2020;3:2690–706. https://doi.org/10.1364/osac.399511.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
