Office Design and Dignity at Work in the Knowledge Economy | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Office Design and Dignity at Work in the Knowledge Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dignity and the Organization

Part of the book series: Humanism in Business Series ((HUBUS))

Abstract

The current chapter looks at a grossly overlooked aspect affecting employee dignity in the workplace – the physical environment. Office buildings represent the second largest financial overhead and they play a critical role in the organization of the processes and the power structure of any organization. Dignity is deconstructed into matters of identity, autonomy, dependency, seriousness, and trust which are linked to the studied effects of the office environment on employees - (i) the office structure and layout, (ii) the office décor and design, and (iii) ergonomic aspects. Their effects are expressed at multiple levels and encompass broad outcomes ranging from individual physical and psychological wellbeing to job satisfaction to team cohesion and organizational performance. Employees are almost never consulted on their preferences for elements of the office design and that there is no recognition for the need for different solutions for different types of employees and contexts. This state of affairs brings the question of employee dignity into the picture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 9151
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The literature on the physical environment in the workplace is widely fragmented with various terms in use including: space, place, surroundings, locale, built environment, workspace, building, organizational space, etc. (Taylor and Spicer 2007). We use some of these terms interchangeably throughout the chapter.

  2. 2.

    Vischer (1995) offers an informative description of how workspace decisions are made.

  3. 3.

    Here is quote from a Google employee: “… if you have to work in one of the four main campus buildings, you will most likely be extremely cramped. It’s not uncommon to see 3–4 employees in a single cube, or several managers sharing an office. With all the open areas for food, games, TV, tech talks, etc., it can be surprisingly hard to find a quiet, private place to think” (Edwards 2015).

References

  • Altman, I. 1975. The Environment and Social Behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B.E., and F. Mael. 1989. Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review 14(1): 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkanasy, N., O. Ayoko, and K. Jehn. 2014. Understanding the Physical Environment of Work and Employee Behavior: An Affective Events Perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior 35(8): 1169–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoko, O.B., N.M. Ashkanasy, and K.A. Jehn. 2014. Approaches to the Study of Employees’ Territoriality, Conflict, Emotions and Well-Being. In Handbook of Conflict Management Research, eds. O.B. Ayoko, N.M. Ashkanasy, and K.A. Jehn, 363–381. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, P.M., and P. Taylor. 2000. Entrapped by the “Electronic Panopticon”? Worker Resistance in the Call Centre. New Technology Work and Employment 15(1): 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, C., and A. Barnes. 2012. The Open-Plan Academy: Space Control and the Undermining of Professional Identity. Work, Employment & Society 26: 228–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, A. 2007. The Construction of Control: The Physical Environment and the Development of Resistance and Accommodation Within Call Centres. New Technology Work and Employment 22(3): 246–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, S.C. 2010. Being Human: Dignity of Labour as the Foundation for the Spirit-Work Connection. Journal of Management Spirituality & Religion 7(2): 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A.P., and H.M. Weiss. 2002. Organizational Behavior: Affect in the Workplace. Annual Review of Psychology 53(1): 279–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., and S.L. Robinson. 2011. Reactions to Territorial Infringement. Organization Science 22(1): 210–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, D.G., and J.M. Rios. 1995. How Employees Assess the Quality of Physical Work Settings. Public Productivity & Management Review 18: 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. 2008. A Curiously British Story: Foucault Goes to Business School. International Studies of Management and Organization 38(1): 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chigot, P. 2003. Controlled Transparency in Workplace Design: Balancing Visual and Acoustic Interaction in Office Environments. Journal of Facilities Management 2: 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Croon, E.M., J.K. Sluiter, P.P.F.M. Kuijer, and M.H.W. Frings-Dresen. 2005. The Effect of Office Concepts on Worker Health and Performance: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Ergonomics 48(2): 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, K., and G. Burrell. 2007. The Spaces of Organisation and the Organisation of Space: Power, Identity and Materiality at Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M.C., D.J. Leach, and C.W. Clegg. 2011. The Physical Environment of the Office: Contemporary and Emerging Issues. In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, eds. G.P. Hodgkinson and J.K. Ford, 193–235. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L., and R.M. Ryan. 2000. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11: 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C. 2011. Reorienting Management Education: From the Homo Economicus to Human Dignity. In Business Schools Under Fire: Humanistic Management Education as the Way Forward, eds. W. Amann, M. Pirson, C. Dierksmeier, E. Von Kimakowitz, and H. Spitzeck, 19–40. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drescher, S. 2010. Econocide: British Slavery in the Era of Abolition. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. 2015. Google Employees Confess All the Worst Things about Working at Google (GOOG), Tech Insider, September 30, http://finance.yahoo.com/news/google-employees-confess-worst-things-125950258.html. Last Accessed 1 Oct 2015.

  • Elsbach, K.D., and M.G. Pratt. 2007. The Physical Environment in Organizations. The Academy of Management Annals 1(1): 181–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K.D. 2003. Relating Physical Environment to Self-Categorizations: Identity Threat and Affirmation in a Non-territorial Office Space. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 622–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisinger, S., and S.J. Blatt. 1994. Individuality and Relatedness: Evolution of a Fundamental Dialectic. American Psychologist 49: 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J.R., and G.R. Oldham. 1976. Motivation Through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16: 250–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. 2011. Dignity: The Essential Role It Plays in Resolving Conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, R. 2001. Dignity at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, R., and V.J. Roscigno. 2004. Organizational Success and Worker Dignity: Complementary or Contradictory? American Journal of Sociology 110(3): 672–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kateb, G. 2011. Human Dignity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, C., and S.A. Haslam. 2010. Your Place or Mine? Organizational Identification and Comfort as Mediators of Relationships Between the Managerial Control of Workspace and Employees’ Satisfaction and Wellbeing. British Journal of Management 21(3): 717–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D. 2002. Writing Organizational Analysis into Foucault. Organization 9(4): 575–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornberger, M., and S.R. Clegg. 2004. Bringing Space Back In: Organizing the Generative Building. Organization Studies 25(7): 1095–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J.E., T.S. Heffner, G.F. Goodwin, E. Salas, and J.A. Cannon-Bowers. 2000. The Influence of Shared Mental Models on Team Process and Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 85(2): 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, J.C., and P.C. Morrow. 2010. Employee Reactions to Office Redesign: A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Field Experiment in a Multi-Generational Setting. Human Relations 63: 609–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J.R., and H. Aguinis. 2013. The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing Effect in Management. Journal of Management 39(2): 313–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirson, M. 2014. Dignity-A Missing Piece in the Puzzle of Organizational Research? (Humanistic Management Network, Research Paper Series, (14–11)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirson, M. and C. Dierksmeier 2014. Reconnecting Management Theory and Social Welfare: A Humanistic Perspective-Dignity as the Missing Link, Fordham University Schools of Business Research Paper, (2410374), 14–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W., and K. Snellman. 2004. The Knowledge Economy. Annual Review of Sociology 30: 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. 2007. Dignity at Work: Broadening the Agenda. Organization 14(4): 565–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Jackson, T.L., and K.W. Klein. 2009. Open-Plan Offices: Task Performance and Mental Workload. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29: 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom, E. 2001. Workplace Environmental Psychology. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences 16593–16598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., and A. Spicer. 2007. Time for Space: A Narrative Review of Research on Organizational Spaces. International Journal of Management Reviews 9(4): 325–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.C., P.J. Oakes, S.A. Haslam, and C.A. McGarty. 1994. Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20: 454–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Marrewijk, A., and D. Yanow. 2010. Introduction: The Spatial Turn in Organizational Studies. In Organizational Spaces: Rematerializing the Workaday World, eds. A. Van Marrewijk and D. Yanow, 1–16. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vischer, J.C. 1995. Strategic Work-Space Planning. Sloan Management Review 37(1): 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2007. The Effects of the Physical Environment on Job Performance: Towards a Theoretical Model of Workspace Stress. Stress and Health 23(3): 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H.M., and R. Cropanzano. 1996. Affective Events Theory: A Theoretical Discussion of the Structure, Causes, and Consequences of Affective Experiences at Work. In Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, eds. B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings, 1–74. Westport, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, M. 2000. Office Clutter or Meaningful Personal Displays: The Role of Office Personalization in Employee and Organizational Well-Being. Journal of Environmental Psychology 20: 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nikolaeva, R., Russo, S.D. (2017). Office Design and Dignity at Work in the Knowledge Economy. In: Kostera, M., Pirson, M. (eds) Dignity and the Organization. Humanism in Business Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55562-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics