Abstract
Initiatives relying on artificial intelligence (AI) to deliver socially beneficial outcomes—AI for social good (AI4SG)—are on the rise. However, existing attempts to understand and foster AI4SG initiatives have so far been limited by the lack of normative analyses and a shortage of empirical evidence. In this Perspective, we address these limitations by providing a definition of AI4SG and by advocating the use of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a benchmark for tracing the scope and spread of AI4SG. We introduce a database of AI4SG projects gathered using this benchmark, and discuss several key insights, including the extent to which different SDGs are being addressed. This analysis makes possible the identification of pressing problems that, if left unaddressed, risk hampering the effectiveness of AI4SG initiatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
9,800 Yen / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
¥14,900 per year
only ¥1,242 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hager, G. D. et al. Artificial intelligence for social good. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.05406 (2017).
Wang, D., Khosla, A., Gargeya, R., Irshad, H. & Beck, A. H. Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05718 (2016).
Davenport, T. & Kalakota, R. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc. J. 6, 94–98 (2019).
Rolnick, D. et al. Tackling climate change with machine learning. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.05433 (2019).
Zhou, Y., Wang, F., Tang, J., Nussinov, R. & Cheng, F. Artificial intelligence in COVID-19 drug repurposing. Lancet Digit. Health 2, e667–e676 (2020).
Hilbert, M. Big data for development: a review of promises and challenges. Dev. Policy Rev. 34, 135–174 (2016).
Taylor, L. & Schroeder, R. Is bigger better? The emergence of big data as a tool for international development policy. GeoJournal 80, 503–518 (2015).
Floridi, L. & Cowls, J. A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harv. Data Sci. Rev. 1, https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1 (2019).
Taddeo, M. & Floridi, L. How AI can be a force for good. Science 361, 751–752 (2018).
Vinuesa, R. et al. The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–10 (2020).
Chui, M. et al. Notes From The AI frontier: Insights From Hundreds Of Use Cases. (McKinsey Global Institute, 2018).
International Telecommunication Union (ITU) AI Repository; https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/AI/Pages/ai-repository.aspx
AI for Good Global Summit (28−31 May 2019, Geneva, Switzerland) (AI for Good, 2019); https://aiforgood.itu.int/
Strickland, E. How IBM Watson overpromised and underdelivered on AI health care. In IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News https://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/diagnostics/how-ibm-watson-overpromised-and-underdelivered-on-ai-health-care (IEEE, 2019).
Ross, C. & Swetlitz, I. IBM pitched its Watson supercomputer as a revolution in cancer care. It’s nowhere close. In STAT https://www.statnews.com/2017/09/05/watson-ibm-cancer/ (5 September 2017).
Goel, A. et al. Using Watson for enhancing human-computer co-creativity. In 2015 AAAI Fall Symp. Ser. (IEEE, 2015).
Abebe, R. et al. Roles for computing in social change. In FAT* ’20: Proc. 2020 Conf. on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372871
Green, B. ‘Good’ isn’t good enough. In Proc. AI for Social Good Worksh. NeurIPS (2019).
United Nations Development Program (UNDP) Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html (UNDP, 2015).
Ram, A. Europe’s AI start-ups often do not use AI, study finds. Financial Times (5 March 2019).
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A. & McCallum, A. Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. Proc. 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 3645–3650 (ACL, 2019).
Inter-American Development Bank fAIrLAC Observatory (IADB, 2020); https://fairlac.iadb.org/en/observatory
Oxford Initiative on AI×SDGs. https://www.aiforsdgs.org/ (2020).
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., King, T. C. & Taddeo, M. How to design AI for social good: seven essential factors. Sci. Eng. Ethics 26, 1771–1796 (2020).
Dandres, T. et al. Consequences of future data center deployment in Canada on electricity generation and environmental impacts: A 2015–2030 prospective study. J. Ind. Ecol. 21, 1312–1322 (2017).
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A. & McCallum, A. Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02243 (2019).
Shrestha, P. Leading energy and tech groups call for International Centre for AI, Energy and Climate. Energy Live News https://www.energylivenews.com/2019/08/20/leading-energy-and-tech-groups-call-for-international-centre-for-ai-energy-and-climate/ (20 August 2019).
Acknowledgements
J.C. acknowledges the receipt of a Doctoral Studentship from the Alan Turing Institute. M.T. and L.F. acknowledge the Oxford Initiative on AI for SDG, which is supported by grants from Facebook, Google and Microsoft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Machine Intelligence thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cowls, J., Tsamados, A., Taddeo, M. et al. A definition, benchmark and database of AI for social good initiatives. Nat Mach Intell 3, 111–115 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00296-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00296-0