Climate tipping points — too risky to bet against
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Climate tipping points — too risky to bet against

The growing threat of abrupt and irreversible climate changes must compel political and economic action on emissions.
  1. Timothy M. Lenton

    1. Timothy M. Lenton is director of the Global Systems Institute, University of Exeter, UK.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  2. Johan Rockström

    1. Johan Rockström is director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  3. Owen Gaffney

    1. Owen Gaffney is a global sustainability analyst at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany; and at the Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Sweden.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  4. Stefan Rahmstorf

    1. Stefan Rahmstorf is professor of physics of the oceans at the University of Potsdam; and head of Earth system analysis at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  5. Katherine Richardson

    1. Katherine Richardson is professor of biological oceanography at the Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  6. Will Steffen

    1. Will Steffen is emeritus professor of climate and Earth System science at the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  7. Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

A plane flying over a river of meltwater on glacier in Alaska

An aeroplane flies over a glacier in the Wrangell St Elias National Park in Alaska. Credit: Frans Lanting/Nat Geo Image Collection

Politicians, economists and even some natural scientists have tended to assume that tipping points1 in the Earth system — such as the loss of the Amazon rainforest or the West Antarctic ice sheet — are of low probability and little understood. Yet evidence is mounting that these events could be more likely than was thought, have high impacts and are interconnected across different biophysical systems, potentially committing the world to long-term irreversible changes.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 575, 592-595 (2019)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03595-0

Updates & Corrections

  • Correction 09 April 2020: The figure ‘Too close for comfort’ in this Comment incorrectly synthesized and interpreted data from the IPCC. The graph labelled the temperatures as absolute, rather than rises; misrepresented the levels of risk; misinterpreted data as coming from a 2007 IPCC report; extrapolated the focus of a 2018 report; and was not clear about the specific sources of the data. The graphic has been extensively modified online to correct these errors.

References

  1. Lenton, T. M. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1786–1793 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. IPCC. Global Warming of 1.5°C (IPCC, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. IPCC. IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (IPCC, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cai, Y., Lenton, T. M., & Lontzek, T. S. Nature Clim. Change 6, 520–525 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feldmann, J. & Levermann, A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14191–14196 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aschwanden, A. et al. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav9396 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Drijfhout, S. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E5777–E5786 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lovejoy, T. E. & Nobre, C. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat2340 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Walker, X. J. et al. Nature 572, 520–523 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogelj, J., Forster, P. M., Kriegler, E., Smith, C. J. & Séférian, R. Nature 571, 335–342 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Steffen, W. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 8252–8259 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneider, T., Kaul, C. M. & Pressel, K. G. Nature Geosci. 12, 163–167 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan, I., Storelvmo, T. & Zelinka, M. D. Science 352, 224–227 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rocha, J. C., Peterson, G., Bodin, Ö. & Levin, S. Science 362, 1379–1383 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Caesar, L., Rahmstorf, S., Robinson, A., Feulner, G. & Saba, V. Nature 556, 191–196 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links