Unidirectional loop network layout by a LP heuristic and design of telecommunications networks | Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Skip to main content
Log in

Unidirectional loop network layout by a LP heuristic and design of telecommunications networks

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a new linear programming-based heuristic procedure for optimal design of the unidirectional loop network layout problem. The heuristic procedure employs a linear programming formulation and solves the problem using the flow matrix of the unidirectional loop problem. To find an optimal solution, one can either generate all possible solutions or use a branch-and-bound procedure. But, both above methods require very high computational time and computer memory for larger problems. The heuristic developed in this paper is quite fast and obtains near optimal solutions. The heuristic procedure was tested on 16 different problems selected from the literature. The results showed that in most cases optimal—and in a few cases near optimal—solutions were obtained with very little computational time. Several examples are discussed. We also demonstrate that the above problem formulation and approach can be used to solve a special class of telecommunication networks where a set of computers (or processors) are attached by unidirectional point-to-point links around a loop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afentakis, P. (1989) A loop layout design problem for flexible manufacturing systems. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing System, 1, 175–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anstreicher, K. and Brixius, N. (2001) A new bound for the quadratic assignment problem based on convex quadratic programming. Mathematical Programming, 89, 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffa, Armour and Vollmann (1985) Allocating facilities with CRAFT. Harvard Business Review, 42, 136–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkard, R., Karisch, S. and Franz, R. (1997) QAPLIB a quadratic assignment problem library. Journal of Global Optimization, 10, 391–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwif, L., Barretto, M. and Moscato, L. (1998) A solution to the facility layout problem using simulated annealing. Computers in Industry, 36, 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, P. C. (1963) Optimal and suboptimal algorithms for the quadratic assignment problem. SIAM Journal, 10, 305–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heragu, S. (1997) Facilities Design, PWS Publishing Co., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heragu, S. S. and Kusiak, A. (1988) Machine layout problem in flexible manufacturing systems. Operations Research, 36, 258–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, V. and Soumen, G. (1996) Cellular manufacturing using virtual cells. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16, 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiran, A. S. and Karabati, S. (1988) The station location problem on unicyclic material handling networks. Working Paper, ISE Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiran, A. S. and Tansel, B. C. (1989) Optimal pickup location on material handling networks. International Journal of Production Research, 27, 1475–1486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishimoto, R. (2000) Agent communication transport network for agent communication services. Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part I: Communications), 83, 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C. and Beckman, M. (1957) Assignment problem and the location of economic activities. Econometrica, 25.

  • Kouvelis, P. and Kim, M. W. (1992) Unidirectional loop network layout problem in automated manufacturing systems. Operations Research, 40(3), 533–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunito, G., Aizawa K. and Hatori M. (2001) Tracking agent for communication between multiple cooperative agents. Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part 1: Communications), 84, 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. L. (1963) The quadratic assignment problem. Management Science, 9, 586–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee and Moore (1967) CORELAP-computerized relationship layout planning. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 18, 295–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. and Stecke, K. (1998) Production planning for flexible flow systems with limited machine flexibility. IIE Transactions, 30, 669–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, J. (1992) A graph-theoretic heuristic for designing loop layout manufacturing systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 57, 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. and Block, B. (1980) On the application of computer aids to plant layout. International Journal of Production Research, 18, 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malakooti, B. (1989) Multiple objective facility layout: a heuristic to generate efficient alternative. International Journal of Production Research, 27(7), 1225–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malakooti, B. and Raman, V. (2000) Clustering and selection of multiple criteria alternatives using unsupervised and supervised neural networks. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 11, 435–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malakooti, B. and Subramanian, S. (1999) Generalized polynomial decomposable multiple attribute utility functions for ranking and rating of alternatives. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 106, 69–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mir, M. and Imam, M. H. (2001) A hybrid optimization approach for layout design of unequal-area facilities. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 39, 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, C. E., Vollmann, T. E. and Rumi, J. (1968) An experimental comparison of techniques for the assignment of facilities to location. Operations Research, 16, 150–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwubolu, G. (1998) Redesigning jobshops to cellular manufacturing systems. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 9, 377–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponnambalam, S., Aravindan, P. and Raghu Rami Reddy, K. (1999) Analysis of group-scheduling heuristics in a manufacturing cell. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 15, 914–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramabhatta, V. and Nagi, R. (1998) An integrated formulation of manufacturing cell formation with capacity planning and multiple routings. Annals of Operations Research, 77, 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reva, V. (2001) A new form of the quadratic assignment problem and approximate solutions. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 37, 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawik, T. (2000) An LP-based approach for loading and routing in a flexible assembly line. International Journal of Production Economics, 64, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansel, B. and Bilen, C. (1998) Move based heuristics for the unidirectional loop network layout problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, J. and White, J. (1984) Facilities Planning, John Wiley and Sons.

  • Vairaktarakis, G. and Elhafsi, M. (2000) The use of flowlines to simplify routing complexity in two-stage flowshops. IIE Transactions, 32, 687–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. and Zorn W. (1998) Developing network management applications in an application-oriented way using mobile agent. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30, 1551–1557.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malakooti, B. Unidirectional loop network layout by a LP heuristic and design of telecommunications networks. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 15, 117–125 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JIMS.0000010079.68350.ae

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JIMS.0000010079.68350.ae

Navigation