The nature and relationship between the productivity of journals and their citations in semiconductor literature | Scientometrics Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The nature and relationship between the productivity of journals and their citations in semiconductor literature

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between journals" productivity and their citations in the field of semiconductors. Journal samples were gathered from the INSPEC database, 1978 to 1997 while the data of citation frequency, impact factor, cited half-life and citing half-life were obtained from Science Citation Index, Journal Citation Reports 1997 CD-ROM edition. One thousand and eight hundred and seventy seven journals publishing articles on semiconductors were retrieved. The nature for the data of journal productivity, impact factor, cited half-life and citing half-life are explored. Among these journals, only 672 journals that were covered in JCR were compared. Moreover, statistical tests of more productive journals with cumulative publication in semiconductor >100 were also conducted on the basis of all articles they published annually (for 1997). The results of the study showed that there is a significant correlation between journal productivity and citation frequency and between journal productivity and impact factor. However, there are no associations between journal productivity and cited half-life and between journal productivity and citing half-life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Line, M. B., Sandison, A., Obsolescence and changes in the use of literature with time, Journal of Documentation, 30 (3) (1975) 283–350.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ibid, p. 286.

  3. SCI Journal Citation Reports, 1993, p. 10.

  4. Lancaster, F. W., Bibliometric Methods in Assessing Productivity and Impact of Research, Bangalore: Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, 1991, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gross, P. L. K., Gross, E. M., College libraries and chemical education, Science, 66 (1927) 385–389.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Magyar, G., Bibliometric analysis of a new research sub-field, Journal of Documentation, (1974) 32.

  7. Boyce, B. R., Funk, M., Bradford's law and the selection of high quality papers, Library Resources and Technical Services, 22 (1978) 390.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boyce, B. R., Pollens, J. S., Citation-based impact measures and Bradfordian criteria, Collection Management, 4 (1982) 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawani, S. M., Quality, Collaboration and Citations in Cancer Research: A Bibliometric Study, Ph. D diss., Florida State University, 1980.

  10. Pontigo-Martinez, J., Lancaster, F. W., Qualitative aspects of the Bradford distribution, Scientometrics, 9 (1–2) (1986) 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ibid, p. 61.

  12. Wallace, D. P., Bonzi, S., The relationship between journal productivity and quality, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, (1985) 193–196.

  13. Brookes, B. C., Obsolescence of special library periodicals: Sampling errors and utility contours, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 21 (1970) 320–329.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buckland, M. K., Are obsolescence and scattering related? Journal of Documentation, 28 (1972) 242–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brookes, B. C., Numerical methods of bibliographic analysis, Library Trends, 22 (1973) 34.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ash, J., Library use of public health materials: Description and analysis, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 62 (1974) 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Queiroz, G. G., Lancaster, F. W., Growth, dispersion and obsolescence of the literature-A case study from thermoluminescent dosimetry, Journal of Research Communication Studies, 2 (1981) 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wallace, D. P., The Relationship between Journal Productivity and Obsolescence in a Subject Literature, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1985, p. iii.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsay, M.-Y., Jou, S.-J., Ma, S.-S., A bibliometric study of semiconductor literature, 1978–1997, Scientometrics, 49 (3) (2000) 491–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lancaster, F. W., Vocabulary Control for Information Retrieval, 2nd ed. Arlington, VA: Information Resources, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tsay, et al., Ref. 19.

  22. ibid.

  23. Subramanyam, K., Scientific and Technical Information Resources, New York: Marcel Dekker, 1981, pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McCain, K. W., Turner, K., Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics, Scientometrics, 17 (1–2) (1989) 127–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pravdic, N., Pekorori, R., The citing practices of the authors of the national journals in mathematics, physics, and chemistry, Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information and Library Science, Tamkang University, Tamsui, Taipei, Taiwan, 251

    Ming-Yueh Tsay & Shiao-Shing Ma

Authors
  1. Ming-Yueh Tsay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shiao-Shing Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsay, MY., Ma, SS. The nature and relationship between the productivity of journals and their citations in semiconductor literature. Scientometrics 56, 201–222 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021915127459

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021915127459

Keywords

Search

Navigation