Abstract
Many international comparisons of the publication performance at themacro level are based on direct counts of citation frequencies in the ScienceCitation Index. However, these comparisons may reveal a significant negativelanguage bias for non-English-speaking countries, or other selection biases,which can be illustrated by the relation between research budgets of scientificinstitutions and SCI publications. Against this background, a two-dimensionalrepresentation, specifying for the international alignment of the nationalpublications and the journal-standardized citation impact, proves to be amore appropriate indicator base to assess the citation performance of countriessuch as Germany. In the light of a ten countries' benchmark, time seriesof these indicators for the nineties show a considerable impact of the Germanunification with a recent trend towards an adaptation of publication behaviourin East Germany towards the Western patterns.
References
W. GlÄnzel, U. Schoepflin, Little scientometrics, big scientometrics... and beyond, Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 375-384, and other articles in Scientometrics, 30 (1994) Nos 3-4.
U. Schmoch, S. Hinze, G. Jaeckel, N. Kirsch, F. Meyer-Krahmer, G. Muent, The role of the scientific community in the generation of technology, In: G. Reger, U. Schmoch (Eds), Organisation of Science and Technology at the Watershed, Physica-Springer Publishers, Heidelberg, 1996, p. 19 onwards.
Ref. 2, pp. 3-4.
H. Grupp, On the supplementary functions of science and technology indicators, Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 447-472.
B. Martin, British science in the 1980s — Has the relative decline continued? Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 27-56.
D. Hicks, T. Ishizuka, P. Keen, S. Sweet, Japanese corporations, scientific research and globalisation, Research Policy, 23 (1994) 375-384.
R. M. May, The scientific world, Science, 275 (1997) 794.
O. Persson, Measuring scientific output by online techniques, In: A. van Raan (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 232-234.
H. Grupp, S. Hinze, International orientation, efficiency of and regard for research in East and West Germany: A bibliometric investigation of aspects of technology genesis in the United Germany, Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 83-113.
H. F. Moed, A. F. J. van Raan, Indicators of research performance: Applications in university research policy, In: A. van Raan (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988, p. 186.
A. Schubert, W. GlÄnzel, T. Braun, Against Absolute Methods: Relative scientometric indicators and relational charts as evaluation tools, In: A. van Raan (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 137-176. See also P. WEINGART, R. SEHRINGER, M. WINTERHAGER, Bibliometric indicators for assessing strenghts and weaknesses of West German science, In: A. VAN RAAN, op. cit., pp. 391-430.
Ref. 7, p. 793.
Ref. 11, p. 139.
Ref. 9, p. 92.
H. Grupp, Foundations of the Economics of Innovation — Theory, Measurement and Practice, Elgar, Cheltenham, 1998, pp. 166-170.
Ref. 15, p. 9 onwards.
OST, Science et Technologie Indicateurs 1998, Economica, Paris, 1998, p. 474.
D. Evans, Crystallography, in: Mac Graw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science & Technology, Vol. 4, New York, 1992, p. 606.
U. Schmoch, Impact of international patent applications on patent indicators, Research Evaluation, forthcoming.
Ref. 15, pp. 157-158.
J. Heckman, The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection, and limited dependent variables and a single estimator for such models, The Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5 (1976) 475-492.
U. Ammon, Deutsch oder Englisch? Über die Wissenschaftssprache der Deutschen, Forschung & Lehre 8 (1988) 415-417.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grupp, H., Schmoch, U. & Hinze, S. International alignment and scientific regard as macro-indicators for international comparisons of publications. Scientometrics 51, 359–380 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012703117727
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012703117727