Abstract
In the power system environment, transmission and expansion planning (TNEP) is an essential and computationally very challenging problem in power systems. Competent and robust optimization techniques are required to get the optimal solution technically and economically. This paper aims to resolve the transmission and expansion planning problem in less computational time and investment costs using H1GAPSO and H2GAPSO algorithms. Two hybrid progressive algorithms based on the combination of PSO and GA methods are proposed and crossing over the PSO and GA have been implemented in this paper. The focus behind the proposed methods is to merge PSO and GA methods in a combination of parallel and series form, respectively. To validate the proposed hybrid algorithm and to test efficacy in comparison with other methods reported in the literature, it is tested on Garver’s-6 bus, IEEE-14 bus, and IEEE-24 bus test systems using MATLAB. For IEEE-14 and IEEE-24 bus systems, by applying the hybridization, the optimal investment costs are reduced to 520 US$ and 630 US$, respectively and the corresponding computational time in seconds are reduced to 4.3637 s and 4.3788 s. For Garver’s 6 bus system, the computational time are 1.4936 s and 1.1847 s for both hybridization. The results are compared with conventional GA and PSO methods. The simulation and observations of the outcome demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed hybrid algorithms' time and have the better ability to find the global optimum solution.











Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available in at https://www.academia.edu/13981064/Data_for_the_IEEE_24_bus_Reliability_Test_System, https://sps-lab.org/tag/garver-6-bus-test-systems/.
Abbreviations
- TNEP:
-
Transmission and expansion planning
- PSE:
-
Power system expansion
- GA:
-
Genetic algorithm
- PSO:
-
Particle swarm optimization
- H1GAPSO:
-
Hybrid type I optimization
- H2GAPSO:
-
Hybrid type II optimization
- IC:
-
Incremental cost
- AC:
-
Alternating current
- Fit:
-
Fitness function
- p.f:
-
Penalty factor
- DC:
-
Direct current
- TNEP:
-
Transmission and expansion planning
- PSE:
-
Power system expansion
- IP:
-
Interior point
- GA:
-
Genetic algorithm
- LP:
-
Linear programming
- IPM:
-
Interior point method
- MV:
-
Multi-verse
- PSO:
-
Particle swarm optimization
- B&B:
-
Branch and bound
- MINLP:
-
Mixed integer non-linear programming
- CS:
-
Cuckoo search
- NSGA:
-
Non-sorted genetic algorithm
- InvC :
-
Transmission cost
- RP:
-
Vector with existing real power
- Q :
-
Vector of node load demand
- I ij :
-
Power flow in branch ij
- \(I_{ij}^{\max }\) :
-
Maximum power flow in branch ij
- B ij :
-
Additional branch
- r ij :
-
Resistance of branch ij
- n ij :
-
Original circuit number in the base system
- X ij :
-
Reactance in branch ij
- X ij max :
-
Maximum reactance in branch ij
- G i min :
-
Minimum real power generation (ith node)
- G i max :
-
Maximum real power generation (ith node)
- M :
-
Susceptance matrix
References
Haghighat H, Zeng B. Bilevel mixed integer transmission expansion planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2018;33(6):7309–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2865189.
Zhang X, Conejo AJ. Candidate line selection for transmission expansion planning considering long- and short-term uncertainty. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2018;100:320–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.02.024.
Gan W, Ai X, Fang J, Yan M, Yao W, Zuo W, Wen J. Security constrained co-planning of transmission expansion and energy storage. Appl Energy. 2019;239:383–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.192.
Romero R, Rider MJ, Silva IJ. A metaheuristic to solve the transmission expansion planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2007;22(4):2289–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2007.907592.
Sarita K, Kumar S, Vardhan ASS, Elavarasan RM, Saket RK, Shafiullah GM, Hossain E. Power enhancement with grid stabilization of renewable energy-based generation system using UPQC-FLC-EVA technique. IEEE Access. 2020;8:207443–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038313.
Romero R, Monticelli A, Garcia A, Haffner S. Test systems and mathematical models for transmission network expansion planning. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib. 2002;149(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-gtd:20020026.
Ramos A, Lumbreras S. How to solve the transmission expansion planning problem faster: acceleration techniques applied to benders’ decomposition. IET Gener Transm Distrib. 2016;10(10):2351–9. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.1075.
Arabpour A, Besmi MR, Maghouli P. Transmission expansion and reactive power planning considering wind energy investment using a linearized AC model. J Electr Eng Technol. 2019;14(3):1035–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-019-00085-1.
Sánchez IG, Romero R, Mantovani JRS, Garcia A. Interior point algorithm for linear programming used intransmission network synthesis. Electr Power Syst Res. 2005;76(1–3):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2005.02.007.
Silva SM, Faria LT, Romero R, Franco JF. Efficient multi-start with path relinking search strategy for transmission system expansion planning. IEEE Access. 2021;9:153213–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3127369.
Freitas PFS, Macedo LH, Romero R. A strategy for transmission network expansion planning considering multiple generation scenarios. Electr Power Syst Res. 2019;172:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EPSR.2019.02.018.
Bahiense L, Oliveira GC, Pereira M, Granville S. A mixed integer disjunctive model for transmission network expansion. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2001;16(3):560–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.932295.
HuamannahuiHuanca D, GallegoPareja LA. Chu and Beasley genetic algorithm to solve the transmission network expansion planning problem considering active power losses. IEEE Lat Am Trans. 2021;19(11):1967–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2021.9475851.
Goldberg DE. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machinelearning. Reading: Addison; 1989. https://doi.org/10.5555/534133.
Fuerte Ledezma LF, Gutiérrez Alcaraz G. Hybrid binary PSO for transmission expansion planning considering N-1 security criterion. IEEE Latin Am Trans. 2020;18(03):545–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2020.9082726.
Gideon Ude N, Yskandar H, Coneth Graham R. A comprehensive state-of-the-art survey on the transmission network expansion planning optimization algorithms. IEEE Access. 2019;7:123158–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2936682.
Mathur SPS, Arya A, Dubey M. Impact of emission trading on optimal bidding of price takers in a competitive energy market. In: Harmony search and nature inspired optimization algorithms. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol. 741. Singapore: Springer; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0761-4_18.
Shaheen AM, El-Sehiemy RA. Application of multi-verse optimizer for transmission network expansion planning in power systems. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Innov. Trends Comput. Eng. (ITCE). 2019. p. 371–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITCE.2019.8646329.
Jenabi M, Ghomi SMTF, Smeers Y. Bi-level game approaches for coordination of generation and transmission expansion planning within a market environment. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2013;28(3):2639–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2236110.
Alvarez MR, Rahmann C, Palma-Behnke R, Estévez PA. A novel meta-heuristic model for the multi-year transmission network expansion planning. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2019;107:523–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.12.022.
Yousaf S, Mughees A, Khan MG, Amin AA, Adnan M. A comparative analysis of various controller techniques for optimal control of smart nano-grid using GA and PSO algorithms. IEEE Access. 2020;8:205696–711. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038021.
Veeresham K, Vaisakh K, Veerakumari M. Cuckoo search algorithm for optimal transmission expansion planning with various load models and FFC. Energy Proc. 2017;117:826–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.200.
Shaddel K, Tabasi M. Transmission expansion planning using bacterial foraging optimization algorithm. Majlesi J Telecommun Devices. 2018. https://doi.org/10.22044/jadm.2016.734.
Sousa AS, Asada EN. Combined heuristic with fuzzy system to transmission system expansion planning. Electr Power Syst Res. 2011;81(1):123–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EPSR.2010.07.021.
Wang Q, Zhang L-Z, Shu J, Wang N. Application of improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm based on threshold selection strategy in transmission network planning. Power Syst Prot Control. 2011;39(3):34–9.
Gajbhiye RK, Naik D, Dambhare S, Soman SA. An expert system approach for multi-year short-term transmission system expansion planning: an Indian experience. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2008;23(1):226–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2007.913687.
Mahdavi M, Kimiyaghalam A, Alhelou HH, Javadi MS, Ashouri A, Catalão JPS. Transmission expansion planning considering power losses, expansion of substations and uncertainty in fuel price using discrete artificial bee colony algorithm. IEEE Access. 2021;9:135983–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3116802.
Arabali A, Ghofrani M, Etezadi-Amoli M, Fadali MS, Moeini-Aghtaie M. A multi-objective transmission expansion planning framework in deregulated power systems with wind generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2014;29(6):3003–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2316529.
Arya A, Kumar Y, Dubey M. Computational intelligence techniques applied to distribution service restoration—a survey of the state of the art. Int Rev Model Simul. 2012;5(2):702–13.
Florez CAC, Ocampo RAB, Zuluaga AHE. Multi-objective transmission expansion planning considering multiple generation scenarios. Int J Elect Power Energy Syst. 2014;62:398–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.04.063.
Maghouli P, Hosseini SH, Buygi MO, Shahidehpour M. A multi-objective framework for transmission expansion planning in deregulated environments. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2009;24(2):1051–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2016499.
Rahmani M, Rashidinejad M, Carreno EM, Romero R. Efficient method for AC transmission network expansion planning. Electr Power Syst Res. 2010;80(9):1056–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2010.01.012.
Mori H, Sone Y. A parallel tabu search based approach to transmission network expansion planning. Proc IEEE Porto Power Tech. 2001;2:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/PTC.2001.964744.
Nwulu N, Gbadamosi SL. Transmission network expansion planning. In: Optimal operation and control of power systems using an algebraic modelling language green energy and technology. Cham: Springer; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00395-1_9.
Fitiwi DZ, Olmos L, Rivier M, Cuadra F, Pérez-Arriaga IJ. Finding a representative network losses model for large-scale transmission expansion planning with renewable energy sources. Energy. 2016;101:343–58.
Zhang X, Shi D, Wang Z, Zeng B, Wang X, Tomsovic K, Jin Y. Optimal allocation of series FACTS devices under high penetration of wind power within a market environment. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2018;33:6206–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the topical collection “Machine Intelligence and Smart Systems” guest edited by Manish Gupta and Shikha Agrawal.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mehroliya, S., Tomar, S., Arya, A. et al. A Novel Hybrid GA-PSO Algorithm-Based Optimization of Transmission and Expansion Planning. SN COMPUT. SCI. 4, 690 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02188-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02188-z