Technologies for the Fast Set-Up of Automated Assembly Processes | KI - Künstliche Intelligenz Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Technologies for the Fast Set-Up of Automated Assembly Processes

  • Research Project
  • Published:
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we describe technologies facilitating the set-up of automated assembly solutions which have been developed in the context of the IntellAct project (2011–2014). Tedious procedures are currently still required to establish such robot solutions. This hinders especially the automation of so called few-of-a-kind production. Therefore, most production of this kind is done manually and thus often performed in low-wage countries. In the IntellAct project, we have developed a set of methods which facilitate the set-up of a complex automatic assembly process, and here we present our work on tele-operation, dexterous grasping, pose estimation and learning of control strategies. The prototype developed in IntellAct is at a TRL4 (corresponding to ‘demonstration in lab environment’).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. http://www.ptgrey.com/products/bumblebee2.

  2. http://www.ascension-tech.com/realtime/RTtrakSTAR.php.

  3. The experiments in [4, 6–8] were done by people not knowing the system before.

  4. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4Yc3_ES2YY.

  5. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXhzSckFy9I.

  6. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4Yc3_ES2YY.

  7. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXhzSckFy9I.

  8. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zW_zH80IO_M.

  9. The Technical Readiness Level indicates the maturity of evolving technologies. It ranges from TRL 1 (basic technology research) to TRL 9 (system operating successfully under normal working conditions).

References

  1. Collins K, Palmer AJ, Rathmill K (1985) The development of a European benchmark for the comparison of assembly robot programming systems. In: Robot technology and applications (Robotics Europe Conference), pp 187–199

  2. Yang Y, Lin L, Song Y, Nemec B, Ude A, Rytz JA, Buch AG, Krüger N, Savarimuthu TR (2014) Programming of peg-in-hole actions by human demonstration. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Internation Conference on Mechatronics and Control

  3. Ijspeert AJ, Nakanishi J, Hoffmann H, Pastor P, Schaal S (2013) Dynamical movement primitives: learning attractor models for motor behaviors. Neural Comput 25(2):328–373

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Marhenke I, Fischer K, Savarimuthu TR (2014) Teleoperation for learning by demonstration: data glove versus object manipulation for intuitive robot control. In: Proceedings of the HRI’14 467 conference, late breaking results, Bielefeld, Germany, pp 242–243

  5. Campbell C, Peters R II, Bodenheimer R, Bluethmann W, Huber E, Ambrose R (2006) Superpositioning of behaviors learned through teleoperation. IEEE Trans Robotics 22(1):79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirstein F, Fischer K, Solvason D (2014) Human embodiment creates problems for robot learning by demonstration using a control panel. In: Proceedings of the HRI’14 Conference, Late Breaking Results, Bielefeld, Germany, pp 212–213

  7. aus der Wieschen M, Fischer K, Kuklinsky K (2014) Intuitive error resolution strategies during robot demonstration. In: Proceedings of the HRI’14 Conference, Late Breaking Results, Bielefeld, Germany, pp 120–121

  8. Marhenke I, Fischer K, Savarimuthu TR (2014) Reasons for singularity in robot teleoperation. In: Proceedings of the HRI’14 Conference, Late Breaking Results, Bielefeld, Germany, pp 242–243

  9. Savarimuthu T, Liljekrans D, Ellekilde LP, Ude AA, Nemec B, Krüger N (2013) Analysis of human peg-in-hole executions in a robotic embodiment using uncertain grasps. In: 9th International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control, RoMoCo

  10. Everingham M, Van Gool L, Williams CK, Winn J, Zisserman A (2010) The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. Int J Comput Vis 88(2):303–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bronstein A, Bronstein M, Castellani U, Falcidieno B, Fusiello A, Godil A, Guibas L, Kokkinos I, Lian Z, Ovsjanikov M et al (2010) Shrec 2010: robust large-scale shape retrieval benchmark. In: Proceedings of the 3DOR, vol 5

  12. Schlette C, Buch AG, Aksoy EE, Steil T, Papon J, Savarimuthu TR, Worgotter F, Kruger N, Rossmann J (2014) A new benchmark for pose estimation with ground truth from virtual reality. Accepted for Production Engineering Research & Development (accepted)

  13. Mustafa W, Pugeault N, Krüger N (2013) Multi-view object recognition using view-point invariant shape relations and appearance information. In: Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2013 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, pp 4230–4237

  14. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Buch AG, Kraft D, Kamarainen JK, Petersen HG, Krüger N (2013) Pose estimation using local structure-specific shape and appearance context. In: Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2013 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, pp 2080–2087

  16. Fischler MA, Bolles RC (1981) Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun ACM 24(6):381–395

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Papon J, Kulvicius T, Aksoy EE, Wörgötter F (2013) Point cloud video object segmentation using a persistent supervoxel world-model. In: Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, pp 3712–3718

  18. Ude A, Nemec B, Petrič T, Morimoto J (2014) Orientation in cartesian space dynamic movement primitives. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, pp 2997–3004

  19. Newman WS, Branicky MS, Podgurski HA, Chhatpar S, Huang L, Swaminathan J, Zhang H (1999) Force-responsive robotic assembly of transmission components. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol 3, Detroit, Michigan, pp 2096–2102

  20. Broenink JF, Tiernego MLJ (1996) Peg-in-Hole assembly using impedance control with a 6 DOF robot. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Simulation Symposium, pp 504–508

  21. Stemmer A, Albu-Schäffer A, Hirzinger G (2007) An analytical method for the planning of robust assembly tasks of complex shaped planar parts. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Rome, Italy, pp 317–323

  22. Bruyninckx H, Dutre S, De Schutter J (1995) Peg-on-hole: a model based solution to peg and hole alignment. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol 2, Nagoya, pp 1919–1924

  23. Bristow D, Tharayil M, Alleyne A (2006) A survey of iterative learning control. IEEE Control Syst Mag 26(3):96–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moore K, Chen Y, Ahn HS (2006) Iterative learning control: a tutorial and big picture view. In: 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, pp 2352–2357

  25. Nemec B, Abu-Dakka F, Jørgensen JA, Savarimuthu TR, Ridge B, Jouffroy J, Petersen HG, Krüger N, Ude A (2013) Transfer of assembly operations to new workpiece poses by adaptation to the desired force profile. In: International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Montevideo, Uruguay

  26. Wolniakowski A, Miatliuk K, Krüger N, Rytzs JA (2014) Automatic evaluation of task-focused parallel jaw gripper design. SIMPAR 2014

  27. Nemec B, Gams A, Ude A (2013) Velocity adaptation for self-improvement of skills learned from user demonstrations. In: IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Atlanta, pp 423–428

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ole Madsen for providing Fig. 2a and Marco Mazzini for providing Fig. 2b. We would like to thank Justus Piater for valuable input to the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute (MMMI), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

    Norbert Krüger, Henrik Gordon Petersen, Lars-Peter Ellekilde, Thiusius Rajeeth Savarimuthu, Jimmy Alison Rytz, Anders Glent Buch, Dirk Kraft & Wail Mustafa

  2. Institute for Design and Communication, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

    Kerstin Fischer

  3. Humanoid and Cognitive Robotics Lab, Department of Automatics, Biocybernetics, and Robotics, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Aleš Ude, Bojan Nemec & Aljaž Kramberger

  4. Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience (BCCN), Georg-August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

    Eren Erdal Aksoy, Jeremie Papon & Florentin Wörgötter

Authors
  1. Norbert Krüger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aleš Ude
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Henrik Gordon Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bojan Nemec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lars-Peter Ellekilde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thiusius Rajeeth Savarimuthu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jimmy Alison Rytz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kerstin Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Anders Glent Buch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dirk Kraft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Wail Mustafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Eren Erdal Aksoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jeremie Papon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Aljaž Kramberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Florentin Wörgötter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norbert Krüger.

Additional information

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007–2013 (Specific Programme Cooperation, Theme 3, Information and Communication Technologies) under Grant agreement no. 269959, IntellAct.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krüger, N., Ude, A., Petersen, H.G. et al. Technologies for the Fast Set-Up of Automated Assembly Processes. Künstl Intell 28, 305–313 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-014-0329-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-014-0329-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation