Probabilistic assessment of switchyard-centered LOOP event frequency and duration in an NPP | International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Probabilistic assessment of switchyard-centered LOOP event frequency and duration in an NPP

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The occurrence of a Loss Of Offsite Power (LOOP) event can be a major threat to nuclear safety due to the dependence of auxiliary systems on electrical energy. Probabilistic safety assessments of nuclear power plants require, thus, estimates of the frequencies and durations of such LOOP events. These estimates are usually based on past statistical data, which is not always relevant. Model-based approaches are thus needed. This paper proposes an analytical method to estimate the frequency and duration of switchyard-centered LOOP events, which constitute one of the four main categories of LOOP events. The proposed method is mainly based on the identification of active minimal cut sets, considering the behavior of circuit breakers against faults according to their coordination and selectivity. Adapted versions of the Risk Reduction Worth and Fussel–Vesely importance factors are proposed to evaluate the impact of components on the switchyard-centered LOOP event frequency. Furthermore, uncertainty analysis is developed and performed. Various generic plant connection schemes are used for application. Results demonstrate the applicability of the methodology to estimate the frequency and duration of switchyard-centered LOOP events, and to identify optimal ways to reduce the risk by modifying the switchyard configuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig.3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Reactor critical years.

References

  • Allan RN (1988) Effects of protection systems operation and failures in composite system reliability evaluation. Electr Power Energy Syst 10(3):180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang AH-S, Pires JA, Vulaverde R (1996) A model for the seismic reliability assessment of electric power transmission systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 51:7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arians R et al. (2016) Effects of external grid disturbances to nuclear power plants. In: Proceedings of the 2016 24th international conference on nuclear engineering (ICONE24), Charlotte, pp 26–30

  • Arigi AM, Park G, Kim J (2020) Dependency analysis method for human failure events in multi-unit probabilistic safety assessments. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 203:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies M (2018) Loss of offsite power frequency estimates due to external events at a Finnish nuclear power plant. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management PSAM 14, Los Angeles

  • Billinton R, Allan RN (1983) Reliability evaluation of engineering systems: concepts and techniques. Plenum press, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R, Allan RN (1994) Reliability evaluation of power system, 2nd edn. Plenum press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R, Lian G (1995) A new technique for active minimal cut set selection used in substation reliability evaluation. Microelectron Reliab 35(5):797–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgade E, Desmas T (1994) Substation reliability evaluation: a specific tool for designers. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 46:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camensig C, Bresesti L, Clementel S, Savertti M (1997) Seismic risk evaluation for high voltage air insulated substations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 55:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardini F, Agliardi GL, Zio E (2017) Estimation of rare event probabilities in power transmission networks subjects to cascading failures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 158:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepin M (2011) Assessment of power system reliability. Springer

  • Cepin M (2012) Advantages and difficulties with the application of methods probabilistic safety assessment to the power systems reliability. Nucl Eng Des 246:136–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepin M (2018) Application of shutdown probabilistic safety assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 178:147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepin M (2020) Probability of restoring power to the transmission power system and the time to restore power. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 193:1065–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang L, Wu Z (2011) Performance and reliability of electrical power grids under cascading failures. Electr Power Energy Syst 33:1410–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa JGDC, da Silva AML, Hamoud GA, Pureza IM, Neto NS (2020) Probabilistic evaluation of distribution power transformers reliability indices considering load transfers and mobile unit substations. Electr Power Syst Res 187:106501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrario E, Zio E (2014) Assessing nuclear power plant safety and recovery from earthquakes using a system of systems approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 125:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjorgiev B, Volkanovski A, Kancev D, Cepin M (2014) Alternative off-site power supply improves nuclear power plant safety. Ann Nucl Energy 71:304–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel L, Shrestha GB (2002) A versatile tool for electric substation reliability assessment. Comput Electr Eng 28:561–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grganić H, Šimić Z (2013) On the estimation and reduction of the frequency of the loss of offsite power event. J Energy 61:131–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Haarla L, Pulkkinen U, Koskinen M, Jyrinsalo J (2008) A method for analysing the reliability of a transmission grid. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henneaux P (2015) Probability of failure of overloaded lines in cascading failures. Electr Power Energy Syst 73:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henneaux P, Labeau P-E, Maun J-C (2012) A level-1 probabilistic risk assessment to blackout hazard in transmission power systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 102:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henneaux P, Labeau P-E (2018) Offsite power reliability assessment for nuclear power plants: an application of dynamic reliability to power systems. In: Advanced concepts in nuclear energy risk assessment and management, pp 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813225619-0007.

  • Henneaux P, Labeau P-E, Obama J (2016) Reliability of offsite power of nuclear power plants in evolving power systems, In: Proceedings of the λμ20 conference, Saint-Malo

  • Horowitz SH, Phadke AG (2014) Power system relaying. 4th edn. Wiley

  • Hortal J, Izquierdo JM (1996) Application of the integrated safety assessment methodology to the protection of electric systems. Reliab Eng Syst 52:315–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Atomic Energy Agency (2012) Electric grid reliability and interface with nuclear power plants, IAEA nuclear energy series. No. NG-T-3.8, IAEA, Vienna

  • International Atomic Energy Agency (2016) Design of electrical power systems for nuclear power plants, IAEA nuclear energy series. No. SSG-34, IAEA, Vienna

  • Jang S, Jae M (2020) A development of methodology for assessing the inter-unit common cause failure in multi-unit PSA model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 203:107012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N, Ma Z, Schroeder J-A (2019) Analysis of loss of offsite power events 1987–2017. Idaho National Laboratory, INL/EXT-18-453559.

  • Jung WS, Yang J-E, Ha J (2003) A new method to evaluate alternate AC power source effects in multi-unit nuclear power plants. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 82:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamyab S, Nematollahi M, Henneaux P, Labeau P-E (2021a) Development of a hybrid method to assess grid-related LOOP scenarios for an NPP. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 206:1072–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamyab S, Nematollahi M, Henneaux P, Labeau P-E (2021b) Investigating the influence of the variation of the load characteristic on the occurrence frequency of grid-related loss of offsite power using a probabilistic-deterministic methodology. Prog Nucl Energy 139:103870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee E-C, Na J-H (2013) Establishment of a maintenance program to prevent loss of offsite power in nuclear power Plants. Nucl Eng Technol 45:791–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei H, Singh C (2015) Power system reliability evaluation considering cyber-malfunctions in substations. Electr Power Syst Res 129:160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim HK, Park J-H (2020) Effects of house load operation on PSA based on operational experiences in Korea. Nucl Eng Technol 52:2812–2820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moazzami M, Hemmati R, Fesharaki FH, Rad SR (2013) Reliability evaluation for different power plant busbar layouts by using sequential Monte Carlo simulation. Electr Power Energy Syst 53:987–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohsendokht M, Hadad K, Jabbari M (2018) Reducing the loss of offsite power contribution in the core damage frequency of VVER-1000 reactor by extending the house load operation period. Ann Nucl Energy 116:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moustafa MAMM, Chang C-K (2021) Preventing cascading failure of electric power protection systems in nuclear power plant. Nucl Eng Technol 53:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noor G, Stedall B, Atiah A (2016) Planning and design considerations associated with integration of the UAE’s first nuclear power plant. In: Proceedings of CIGRE2016, Paris

  • Nuclear Energy Agency (2015) Robustness of electrical systems of nuclear power plants in light of the Fukushima Daiichi accident (ROBELSYS), NEA/CSNI/R(2015)4, NEA, Paris

  • P. M. Subcommittee (1979) IEEE reliability test system. In: IEEE transactions on power apparatus and systems, vol. PAS-98, pp 2047–2054. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1979.319398.

  • Retterath B, Chowdhury AA, Venkata SS (2005) Decoupled substation reliability assessment. Electr Power Energy Syst 27:662–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C, Knudsen J, Kvarfordt K, Wood T (2008) Key attributes of the SAPHIRE risk and reliability analysis software for risk-informed probabilistic applications. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:1151–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šnipas M, Radziukynas V, Valakevicius E (2017) Modeling reliability of power systems substations by using stochastic automata networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 157:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsao T-F, Chang H-C (2003) Composite reliability evaluation model for different types of distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(2):924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. NRC (2005) Reevaluation of station blackout risk at nuclear power plants. NUREG/CR-6890, Washington, 2005

  • Volkanovski A (2017) Wind generation impact on electricity generation adequacy and nuclear safety. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 158:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkanovski A, Cepin M, Mavko B (2009) Application of the fault tree analysis for assessment of power system reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:1116–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkanovski A, Avila AB, Veira MP (2016a) Statistical analysis of loss of offsite power events. Sci Technol Nucl Install. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7692659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkanovski A, Avila AB, Veira MP, Kancev D, Maqua M, Stephan JL (2016b) Analysis of loss of offsite power events reported in nuclear power plants. Nucl Eng Des 307:234–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Electrical Engineering Department, Nuclear Research Centre of Birine, BP. 180, Ain Oussera, 17200, Djelfa, Algeria

    Rabah Benabid

  2. Ecole Polytechnique de Bruxelles, Université libre de Bruxelles, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Pierre Henneaux & Pierre-Etienne Labeau

Authors
  1. Rabah Benabid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pierre Henneaux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pierre-Etienne Labeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rabah Benabid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benabid, R., Henneaux, P. & Labeau, PE. Probabilistic assessment of switchyard-centered LOOP event frequency and duration in an NPP. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 15, 4105–4123 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02416-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02416-6

Keywords