Treating support system dependencies among safety functions in dynamic event tree quantification | International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Skip to main content
Log in

Treating support system dependencies among safety functions in dynamic event tree quantification

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dependencies are present among the safety systems in a nuclear power plant; for example, shared support systems such as power supply, service water, component cooling water, etc. The unavailability of the support systems contributes to the failure of the frontline systems. The solution and quantification of the event trees and fault trees that make up PSA models account for these dependencies. These dependencies must also be treated in dynamic risk assessments using the dynamic event tree framework, in which plant simulations are coupled to the stochastic models. The approaches from classical PSA for dealing with this issue can be adapted to the dynamic event tree work. While the principles are clear, the implementation is complex because of the need to couple the Boolean (logical) algorithms and probabilistic computations with the dynamic progression of the analysis. As an alternative to a fully integrated (online) treatment of the issue within the DET algorithm, this paper presents and demonstrates a post-simulation treatment based on conditional probability calculations. The obtained results are analyzed and compared to a reference solution based on a classical PSA approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hakobyan et al (2008) Dynamic generation of accident progression event trees. Nucl Eng Des 238:3457–3467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durga R. Karanki, Vinh N. Dang, Tae-Wan Kim (2011) Discrete dynamic event tree analysis of MLOCA using ADS-TRACE, ANS PSA 2011 International topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment and analysis on CD-ROM, American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, Wilmington, 13–17 Mar 2011

  • Durga R. Karanki, Vinh N. Dang, Tae-Wan Kim (2012) The impact of dynamics on the MLOCA accident model—an application of dynamic event trees”. In: 11th International probabilistic safety assessment and management conference & The annual european safety and reliability conference (PSAM11-ESREL2012), Helsinki, 25–29 June 2012

  • Kloos M, Peschke J (2006) MCDET: a probabilistic dynamics method combining monte carlo simulation with the discrete dynamic event tree approach. Nucl Sci Eng 153:137–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo JM et al. (2009) SCAIS (Simulation code system for integrated safety assessment): current status and applications,” ESREL 2008, safety, reliability and risk analysis. In: Martorell et al. (eds.) NUREG report—MLOCA Zion PSA, Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 121–128

  • IAEA (1992) Procedure for conducting probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants (level 1), International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Safety Series No. 50-P-4, 1992

  • U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1990) Severe accident risks: an assessment for five U.S. nuclear power plants, NUREG-1150

  • RiskSpectrum—PSA professional software (2006), version 2.10.4, Scandpower AB, Sweden

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Durga Rao Karanki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karanki, D.R., Dang, V.N. Treating support system dependencies among safety functions in dynamic event tree quantification. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 5, 127–132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-014-0222-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-014-0222-9

Keywords