Abstract
The Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) serves as a powerful tool for system risk analysis and reliability assessment. FTA is a top-down approach to failure analysis, starting with a potential undesirable event and then determining Base event (BE). The undesired state of the system is represented by the Top Event (TE). TE and BE are integrated through electronic logic gates (AND gate, OR gate). The fault tree is a tool to identify and assess the combinations of the undesired events in the control of system operation and its environment that can lead to the undesired state of the system. It is recognized worldwide as an important tool for evaluating safety and reliability in system design, development and operation. In this work, an efficient methodology is utilized to find out reliability assessment of critical and/or complex system. The main features and application of this technique for a power system are discussed. Minimal cut sets are developed by means of Boolean equation method. For main substation all CCF are considered at an average temperature of 35 °C. The objective of this work is to develop a method for power system reliability using the FTA approach. The methodology adopted in this investigation is to generate fault trees for each load point of the power system. This fault trees are related to disruption of energy delivery from generators to the specific load points. Quantitative evaluation of the fault trees represents a standpoint for assessment of reliability of power delivery and enables identification of the most important elements in the power system. The power system reliability is assessed and the main contributors to power system reliability are identified, both qualitatively and quantitatively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Institute of chemical engineers, Center for Chemical Process Safety (2008) Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedure, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 142–157
Alvehag K (2008) Impact of dependencies in risk assessments of power distribution system, Licentiate Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology. School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Stockholm
Javadi Mohammad Sadegh, Nobakht Azim, Meskarbashee Ali (2011) Fault tree analysis approach in reliability assessment of power system. Int J Multidiscip Sci Eng 2(6):46–50
Li Z, Yuan Y, Li F (2010) Evaluating the reliability of islanded microgrid in an emergency mode, UPEC, Cardiff, Wales, UK
Massim Y, Zeblah A, Meziane R, Benguediab M, Ghouraf A (2005) Optimal design and reliability evaluation of multi-state series-parallel power system. Nonlinear Dyn 40:309–321
Massim Y, Zeblah A, Benguediab M, Ghouraf A, Meziane R (2006) Reliability evaluation of electrical power systems including multi-state consideration. Electr Eng 88(2):109–116
Matijevics Istava, Jozsa Laios (1995) An Expert-system-assisted reliability analysis of electrical power networks. Eng Appl Artifi Intell 8:449–460
Singh C, Chintaluri GM (1995) Reliability evaluation of interconnected power systems using a multi-parameter gamma distribution. Electr Power Energy Syst 17:151–160
Sinnamon RM, Andrews JD (1997) New approaches to evaluating fault tree. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 58:89–96
Vesely WE, Goldberg FF, Roberts NH, Haasl DF (1981) “Fault tree hand book”, system and reliability research office of nuclear regulary research. U.S nuclear regulatory commission, Washington DC
Vesely W, Dugan J, Fragola J, Minarick J, Railsback J (2002) Fault tree handbook with aerospace applications. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA, New York
Volkanovski Andrija, Cepin Marko, Mavko Borut (2009) Application of the fault tree analysis for assessment of power system reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:1116–1127
Yang Zong-Xiao, Zheng Yan-Yi, Xue Jin-Xue (2009) Development of automatic fault tree synthesis system using decision matrix. Int J Prod Econ 121(1):49–56
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix Nomenclature and abbreviations
Appendix Nomenclature and abbreviations
Symbol | Event |
---|---|
Q GDi , | The failure probability of power delivery to ith load |
R ps , | Power system reliability |
Q ps , | Power system unreliability |
K i , | Capacity of ith load |
K | Total capacity of the system |
R ps | Reliability of the power system |
| AND gate |
| OR gate |
| Basic event |
| Top & intermediate event |
| Transfer gate |
DS | Disconnect switch |
CB | Circuit breakers |
NL, | Number of loads in the system |
TE1, TE2, TE3 and TE4 | Power failure to load 1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 respectively. |
IE1, IE 10, IE18 and | Failure to deliver energy from generators and lines to load 1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 respectively. |
IE26 | Failure of energy delivery from generators to lines |
IE3, IE11, IE19 and IE27 | Failure of generators to load 1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 due to substation component failure respectively. |
IE4, IE12, IE20 and IE28 | Failure of energy delivery from generator 1 (G1) to load1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 respectively. |
IE5, IE13, IE21 and IE29 | Failure of energy delivery from generator 2 (G2) to load, load 2, load 3 and load 4 respectively. |
IE6, IE14, IE22 and IE30 | Failure of energy deliver from G1 to load 1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 through Bus 01 respectively. |
IE7, IE15, IE23 and IE31 | Failure of energy deliver from G1 to load 1, load2, load 3 and load 4 through Bus 02 respectively. |
IE8, IE16, IE24 and IE32 | Failure of energy deliver from G2 to load1, load2, load 3 and load 4 through Bus 01 respectively. |
IE9, IE17, IE25 and IE33 | Failure of energy deliver from G2 to load1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 through Bus 02 respectively. |
BE1, BE8, BE13 and BE18 | DS06, DS08, DS12 and DS14 fails to remain closed respectively. |
BE2, BE9, BE14 and BE 19 | CB03, CB04, CB06 and CB07 fails to remain closed respectively. |
BE3, BE10, BE15 and BE 20 | DS07, DS09, DS13 and DS15 fail to close respectively. |
BE4, BE11, BE16 and BE 21 | CB04, CB08, CB07 and CB05 fail to close respectively. |
BE7, BE12, BE17 and BE22 | Failure of lines to load 1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 respectively. |
BE5 | Failure of generator 1 |
BE6 | Failure of generator 2 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaise, J., Ajay Kumar, N.B., Shanmugam, N.S. et al. Power system: a reliability assessment using FTA. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 4, 78–85 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-012-0100-2
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-012-0100-2