Abstract
The popularity of online marketplaces continues to grow worldwide, and with it comes increased attention to the non-economic value they provide. This study aims to analyze the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reports and news of 13 online marketplace operators and examine their engagement in ESG practices, considering their characteristics and the social environment. By comparing their practices with the generic ESG framework, the study identifies unique factors and approaches specific to ESG practices in online marketplaces, such as constructing industry ecology, contributing to national current affairs and policies, protecting intellectual property, and focusing on information and network security. The study also finds that market transactions, digital innovation, and participant ecology are three key mechanisms that explain the specificity of ESG practices in online marketplaces. The findings of this study offer an ESG framework that can be applied to online marketplaces. It highlights the importance of considering online marketplaces’ social environment and individual characteristics in developing ESG practices. This study provides insights for online marketplace operators to improve their ESG practices and contributes to a growing body of literature on non-economic value creation in online marketplaces.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.
References
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
Albrecht, C. C., Dean, D. L., & Hansen, J. V. (2005). Marketplace and technology standards for B2B e-commerce: Progress, challenges, and the state of the art. Information & Management, 42(6), 865–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.09.003
Alda, M. (2021). The environmental, social, and governance (ESG) dimension of firms in which social responsible investment (SRI) and conventional pension funds invest: The mainstream SRI and the ESG inclusion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126812
Alt, R. (2020). Electronic Markets on sustainability. Electronic Markets, 30(4), 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00451-2
Arvidsson, S., & Dumay, J. (2022). Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2937
Avetisyan, E., & Hockerts, K. (2017). The consolidation of the ESG rating industry as an enactment of institutional retrogression: Consolidation of the ESG rating industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1919
Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A., & Tarelli, A. (2022). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.009
Azmi, W., Hassan, M. K., Houston, R., & Karim, M. S. (2021). ESG activities and banking performance: International evidence from emerging economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 70, 101277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101277
Barrett, M., Oborn, E., & Orlikowski, W. (2016). Creating value in online communities: The sociomaterial configuring of strategy, platform, and stakeholder engagement. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0648
Battisti, E., Nirino, N., Leonidou, E., & Thrassou, A. (2022). Corporate venture capital and CSR performance: An extended resource based view’s perspective. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.054
Berry, T. C., & Junkus, J. C. (2013). Socially responsible investing: An investor perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4), 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1567-0
Bhandari, K. R., Ranta, M., & Salo, J. (2022). The resource-based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm’s embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1525–1537. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2967
Boley, H., & Chang, E. (2007). Digital ecosystems: Principles and semantics. 2007 Inaugural IEEE-IES Digital EcoSystems and Technologies Conference, 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEST.2007.372005
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Chau, M., & Xu, J. (2012). Business intelligence in blogs: Understanding consumer interactions and communities. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1189. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703504
Chen, D. L., & Horton, J. J. (2016). Research note—Are online labor markets spot markets for tasks? A field experiment on the behavioral response to wage cuts. Information Systems Research, 27(2), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0633
Chen, M. T., Yang, D. P., Zhang, W. Q., & Wang, Q. J. (2023). How does ESG disclosure improve stock liquidity for enterprises—Empirical evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 98, 106926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106926
Cheng, L. T. W., Sharma, P., & Broadstock, D. C. (2023). Interactive effects of brand reputation and ESG on green bond issues: A sustainable development perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 570–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3161
Cicchiello, A. F., Marrazza, F., & Perdichizzi, S. (2023). Non-financial disclosure regulation and environmental, social, and governance ( ESG ) performance: The case of EU and US firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), 1121–1128. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2408
Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G. G. (2018). Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0794
Darnall, N., Ji, H., Iwata, K., & Arimura, T. H. (2022). Do ESG reporting guidelines and verifications enhance firms’ information disclosure? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1214–1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2265
Dolnicar, S., & Zare, S. (2020). COVID19 and Airbnb – Disrupting the disruptor. Annals of Tourism Research, 83, 102961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102961
Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
Du, W., Pan, S., Zhou, N., & Ouyang, T. (2018). From a marketplace of electronics to a digital entrepreneurial ecosystem (DEE): The emergence of a meta-organization in Zhongguancun, China. Information Systems Journal, 28, 1158–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12176
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
Eggert, A. (2006). Intangibility and perceived risk in online environments. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(5–6), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725706777978668
Frenken, K. (2017). Sustainability perspectives on the sharing economy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.04.004
Garcia, I. (2017). Translating in the cloud age: Online marketplaces. Hermes, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v0i56.97202
Ge, G., Xiao, X., Li, Z., & Dai, Q. (2022). Does ESG performance promote high-quality development of enterprises in China? The mediating role of innovation input. Sustainability, 14(7), 3843. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073843
Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Grover, V., & Ramanlal, P. (1999). Six myths of information and markets: Information technology networks, electronic commerce, and the battle for consumer surplus. MIS Quarterly, 23(4), 465–495. https://doi.org/10.2307/249486
Han, W., Wang, X., Ahsen, M. E., & Wattal, S. (2022). The societal impact of sharing economy platform self-regulations—An empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 33(4), 1303–1323. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1044
Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Riasanow, T., Setzke, D. S., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Digital Platform Ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 30(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4
Henderikx, M., & Stoffers, J. (2022). An exploratory literature study into digital transformation and leadership: Toward future-proof middle managers. Sustainability, 14(2), 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020687
Hong, Y., & Pavlou, P. A. (2014). Product fit uncertainty in online markets: Nature, effects, and antecedents. Information Systems Research, 25(2), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0520
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Jaiswal, A. K., Niraj, R., Park, C. H., & Agarwal, M. K. (2018). The effect of relationship and transactional characteristics on customer retention in emerging online markets. Journal of Business Research, 92, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.007
Jiang, H., Yang, J., & Gai, J. (2023). How digital platform capability affects the innovation performance of SMEs—Evidence from China. Technology in Society, 72, 102187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102187
Kanat, I., Hong, Y., & Raghu, T. S. (2018). Surviving in global online labor markets for IT services: A geo-economic analysis. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0751
Katsamakas, E., Miliaresis, K., & Pavlov, O. V. (2022). Digital platforms for the common good: Social innovation for active citizenship and ESG. Sustainability, 14(2), 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020639
Khaled, R., Ali, H., & Mohamed, E. K. A. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals and corporate sustainability performance: Mapping, extent and determinants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 127599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127599
Khan, A., & Tao, M. (2022). Knowledge absorption capacity’s efficacy to enhance innovation performance through big data analytics and digital platform capability. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(3), 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100201
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383
Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Kankanhalli, A. (2012). What motivates people to purchase digital items on virtual community websites? The desire for online self-presentation. Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1232–1245. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0411
Kolk, A., & Ciulli, F. (2020). The potential of sustainability-oriented digital platform multinationals: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 355–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.12.008
Lee, M. T., Raschke, R. L., & Krishen, A. S. (2022). Signaling green! Firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation. Journal of Business Research, 138, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.061
Li, L., Du, K., Zhang, W., & Mao, J. Y. (2019). Poverty alleviation through government-led e-commerce development in rural China: An activity theory perspective. Information Systems Journal, 29(4), 914–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12199
Li, L., Hsu, C., Mao, J. Y., & Zhang, W. (2022). Contextualising digital innovation in today’s China: Local practices and global contributions. Information Systems Journal, 32(3), 623–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12379
Li, T. T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. (2021). ESG: Research progress and future prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111663
Lin, I. I., Mahmassani, H. S., Jaillet, P., & Michael Walton, C. (2002). Electronic marketplaces for transportation services: Shipper considerations. Transportation Research Record, 1790(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/1790-01
Liu, B., Pavlou, P. A., & Cheng, X. (2022). Achieving a balance between privacy protection and data collection: A field experimental examination of a theory-driven information technology solution. Information Systems Research, 33(1), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1045
Lokuwaduge, C. S. D. S., & Heenetigala, K. (2017). Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure for a sustainable development: An Australian study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1927
Ludwig, S., Herhausen, D., Grewal, D., Bove, L., Benoit, S., de Ruyter, K., & Urwin, P. (2022). Communication in the gig economy: Buying and selling in online freelance marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 86(4), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211030841
Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2022). The real effects of ESG reporting and GRI standards on carbon mitigation: International evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3281
Luo, X., & Zhang, J. (2013). How do consumer buzz and traffic in social media marketing predict the value of the firm? Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222300208
Lupton, D. (2014). The commodification of patient opinion: The digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(6), 856–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12109
Lupton, D. (2016). The diverse domains of quantified selves: Self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Economy and Society, 45(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2016.1143726
Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.07
Malone, T. W., Yates, J., & Benjamin, R. I. (1987). Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Communications of the ACM, 30(6), 484–497. https://doi.org/10.1145/214762.214766
Meijer, A., & Boon, W. (2021). Digital platforms for the co-creation of public value. Policy & Politics, 49(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16115951032181
Meira, E., Cunha, F. A. F. d. S., Orsato, R. J., Miralles-Quirós, M. M., & Miralles-Quirós, J. L. (2023). The added value and differentiation among ESG investment strategies in stock markets. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1816–1834. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3221
Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
Nguyen, T. T., & Do, M. H. (2022). Female rural–urban migrants and online marketplaces in emerging economies: Evidence from Thailand and Vietnam. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 9(3), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.359
Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company’s financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120341
Ondrus, J., Gannamaneni, A., & Lyytinen, K. (2015). The impact of openness on the market potential of multi-sided platforms: A case study of mobile payment platforms. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 260–275. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.7
Pansera, M., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Crafting sustainable development solutions: Frugal innovations of grassroots entrepreneurs. Sustainability, 8(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010051
Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science, 51(10), 1494–1504. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400
Pavlou, P. A., & Dimoka, A. (2006). The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0106
Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0015
Peng, H., Lu, Y., & Gupta, S. (2023). Promoting value emergence through digital platform ecosystems: Perspectives on resource integration in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189, 122338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122338
Rowe, F., & Markus, M. L. (2022). Taking the measure of digital giants: Amazon and the Social Welfare Computing research agenda. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00544-0
Saura, J. R., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2021). From user-generated data to data-driven innovation: A research agenda to understand user privacy in digital markets. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102331
Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E. G., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615599806
Smith, M. D., & Telang, R. (2018). Data can enhance creative projects—Just look at Netflix. Harvard Business Review, 23. https://hbr.org/2018/01/data-can-enhance-creative-projects-just-look-at-netflix
Standing, S., Standing, C., & Love, P. E. D. (2010). A review of research on e-marketplaces 1997–2008. Decision Support Systems, 49(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.12.008
Strader, T. J., & Shaw, M. J. (1997). Characteristics of electronic markets. Decision Support Systems, 21(3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(97)00028-6
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Sun, H. (2010). Sellers’ trust and continued use of online marketplaces. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00226
Weber, O. (2014). Environmental, social and governance reporting in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(5), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1785
Xia, J. (2022). A systematic review: How does organisational learning enable ESG performance (from 2001 to 2021)? Sustainability, 14(24), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416962
Xu, S., & Yang, R. (2010). Indigenous characteristics of Chinese corporate social responsibility conceptual paradigm. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0224-8
Zha, Y., Li, Q., Huang, T., & Yu, Y. (2022). Strategic information sharing of online platforms as resellers or marketplaces. Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.1397
Zhong, X., Chen, W., & Ren, G. (2022). The impact of corporate social irresponsibility on emerging-economy firms’ long-term performance: An explanation based on signal theory. Journal of Business Research, 144, 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.005
Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3371–3387. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3089
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 72172036, 72032009 and 72072181), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant number 2022M723579), and Beijing Social Science Fund (grant number 16YJC058).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Sunghan Ryu
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, L., Wang, M. & Zhou, X. Creating value beyond commercial outcomes: The ESG practices of online marketplaces for sustainable development. Electron Markets 33, 62 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00682-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00682-z