Abstract
The information asymmetry of online healthcare services in China puts pressure on platforms to assure service efficacy. To prevent the online healthcare market failure and investigate optimal pricing and profits, we compared three quality regulation strategies: (1) no regulation; (2) exclusion: the platform excludes low-quality physicians; and (3) quality certification: the platform certifies high-quality physicians. Our analysis indicates that quality management improves the average quality of registered physicians, the number of users (patients and physicians), and social welfare. The quality certification strategy maximizes social welfare, whereas the exclusion strategy maximizes the scale of high-quality physicians and registered physicians’ average quality. Furthermore, the exclusion strategy can generate the highest profits for the platform only when patients have high enough quality preferences. Finally, the pricing level of healthcare platforms is influenced by network externality and certification investment. This study provides guiding principles for platform managers to regulate online healthcare services.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
Data on results is available upon request.
References
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for ‘lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
Amelio, A., Giardino-Karlinger, L., & Valletti, T. (2020). Exclusionary pricing in two-sided markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 73, 102592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2020.102592
Benoit, S., Baker, T. L., Bolton, R. N., Gruber, T., & Kandampully, J. (2017). A triadic framework for collaborative consumption (CC): Motives, activities and resources & capabilities of actors. Journal of Business Research, 79, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.004
Bensnes, S., & Huitfeldt, I. (2021). Rumor has it: How do patients respond to patient-generated physician ratings? Journal of Health Economics, 76, 102415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102415
Boudreau, K., & Hagiu, A. (2009). Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elger Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 163–191. https://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/elgeechap/13257_5f7.htm
Brekke, K. R., Cellini, R., Siciliani, L., & Straume, O. R. (2010). Competition and quality in health care markets: A differential-game approach. Journal of Health Economics, 29(4), 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.05.004
Caswell, J. A., & Padberg, D. I. (1992). Toward a more comprehensive theory of food labels. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(2), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242500
Chen, Y., & Sivey, P. (2021). Hospital report cards: Quality competition and patient selection. Journal of Health Economics, 78, 102484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102484
Choi, T.-M., & He, Y. (2019). Peer-to-peer collaborative consumption for fashion products in the sharing economy: Platform operations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 126, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.016
Darby, M., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1086/466756
Das, A., Faxvaag, A., & Svans, D. (2015). The impact of an eHealth portal on health care professionals’ interaction with patients: Qualitative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(11), e4950. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4950
Dranove, D., & Jin, G. Z. (2010). Quality disclosure and certification: Theory and practice. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(4), 935–963. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.4.935
Dugdale, D. C., Epstein, R., & Pantilat, S. Z. (1999). Time and the patient-physician relationship. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 14(S1), S34–S40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00263.x
Eijk, E. S. V., Busschbach, J. J. V., Monteban, H., Timman, R., & Wefers Bettink-Remeijer, M. (2014). Towards patient self-triage in the ophthalmic emergency department: Sensitivity and specificity of a self-triage instrument. Acta Ophthalmologica, 92(7), 697–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12342
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Alstyne, M. W. V. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92–101+149. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510107
Eysenbach, G. (2008). Medicine 2.0: Social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(3), e22. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1030
Gao, M. (2018). Platform pricing in mixed two-sided markets: Pricing in mixed two-sided markets. International Economic Review, 59(3), 1103–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12298
Ghandour, Z., Siciliani, L., & Straume, O. R. (2022). Investment and quality competition in healthcare markets. Journal of Health Economics, 82, 102588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102588
Ghiassaleh, A., Kocher, B., & Czellar, S. (2020). Best seller!? Unintended negative consequences of popularity signs on consumer choice behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(4), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.04.003
Goetzinger, L., Park, J., Jung Lee, Y., & Widdows, R. (2007). Value-driven consumer e-health information search behavior. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 1(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506120710762988
Goh, J. M., Gao, G., & Agarwal, R. (2016). The creation of social value: Can an online health community reduce rural-urban health disparities? Management Information Systems Quarterly, 40(1), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.1.11
Goh, J. M., Gao, G. (Gordon)., & Agarwal, R. (2011). Evolving work routines: Adaptive routinization of information technology in healthcare. Information Systems Research, 22(3), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0365
Hagiu, A. (2009). Quantity vs. quality and exclusion by two-sided platforms. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1374960
Huang, N., Yan, Z., & Yin, H. (2021). Effects of online–offline service integration on e-healthcare providers: A quasi-natural experiment. Production and Operations Management, 30(8), 2359–2378. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13381
Huang, P., Lyu, G., & Xu, Y. (2022). Quality regulation on two-sided platforms: Exclusion, subsidization, and fi-rst-party applications. Management Science, 68(6), 4415–4434. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4075
Hui, X., Liu, Z., & Zhang, W. (2023). From high bar to uneven bars: The impact of information granularity in quality certification. Management Science, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4666
Kim, J.-H., Prince, J., & Qiu, C. (2014). Indirect network effects and the quality dimension: A look at the gaming industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 37, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.08.005
Kimery, K. M., & McCord, M. (2002). Third party assurances: Mapping the road to trust in eRetailing. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4(2), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2002.994158
Liu, J., Bian, Y., Ye, Q., & Jing, D. (2019). Free for caring? The effect of offering free online medical-consulting services on physician performance in e-health care. Telemedicine and E-Health, 25(10), 979–986. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2018.0216
Lu, H. (2021). On the risks and countermeasures of the third-party platform of internet medical service. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and social sciences), 23(3), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.3876/j.issn.16714970.2021.03.012
Menapace, L., & Moschini, G. (2012). Quality certification by geographical indications, trademarks and firm re-putation. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 39(4), 539–566. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbr053
Muñoz, R. F. (2010). Using evidence-based internet interventions to reduce health disparities worldwide. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(5), e60. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1463
Olivella, P., & Siciliani, L. (2017). Reputational concerns with altruistic providers. Journal of Health Economics, 55, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.05.003
Özpolat, K., Gao, G (Gordon)., Jank, W., & Viswanathan, S. (2013). Research note-The value of third-party assurance seals in online retailing: An empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 1100–1111. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2013.0489
Roettl, J., Bidmon, S., & Terlutter, R. (2016). What predicts patients’ willingness to undergo online treatment and pay for online treatment? Results from a web-based survey to investigate the changing patient-physician relationship. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e5244. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5244
Ronnen, U. (1991). Minimum quality standards, fixed costs, and competition. Rand Journal of Economics, 22(4), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600984
Shi, Z (June)., Srinivasan, K., & Zhang, K. (2022). Design of platform reputation systems: Optimal information disclosure. Marketing Science, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.1392
Vimarlund, V., Nikula, N., & Nøhr, C. (2021). Business models and eHealth social innovations for social care services: Serving the two sides of the market. Health Policy and Technology, 10(4), 100555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100555
Wang, D., Liu, W., Shen, X., & Wei, W. (2019). Service order allocation under uncertain demand: Risk aversion, peer competition, and relationship strength. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 130, 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.09.005
Wang, L., Yan, L (Lucy)., Zhou, T., Guo, X., & Heim, G. R. (2020). Understanding physicians’ online-offline be-havior dynamics: An empirical study. Information Systems Research, 31(2), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0901
Wei, W., Liu, W., Tang, O., Dong, C., Liang, Y. (2022). CSR investment for a two-sided platform: Network externality and risk aversion. European Journal of Operational Research, S0377221722006919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.08.048
Wen, X., & Siqin, T. (2020). How do product quality uncertainties affect the sharing economy platforms with risk considerations? A mean-variance analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 224, 107544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107544
Xu, D., Zhan, J., Cheng, T., Fu, H., & Yip, W. (2022). Understanding online dual practice of public hospital doct-ors in China: A mixed-methods study. Health Policy and Planning, 37(4), 440–451. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czac017
Yan, Z., Song, X., & Jia, L. (2023). Factors affecting doctors’ multi-homing usage preference towards online me-dical platforms. Chinese Journal of Management, 20(3), 432–439. https://doi.org/10.3969.j.issn.1672-884x.2023.03.012
Zhang, X., Tinacci, L., Xie, S., Wang, J., Ying, X., Wen, J., & Armani, A. (2022). Caviar products sold on chinese business to customer (B2C) online platforms: Labelling assessment supported by molecular identification. Food Control, 131, 108370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108370
Zhang, Z., & Xiong, J. (2022). Subject driving factors of supply of internet medical services. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Socail Sciences), 24(1), 38–46+110. https://doi.org/10.3876/j.issn.1671-4970.2022.01.006
Zheng, H., Wu, H., & Tian, L. (2022). Healthcare service enhancement with patient search. Journal of Business Research, 152, 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.060
Zheng, Y., & Kaiser, H. (2013). Optimal quality threshold of admission in a two-sided farmers’ market. Applied Economics, 45(23), 3360–3369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2012.711941
Acknowledgements
We appreciate the help of editors. All remaining errors are ours.
Funding
This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71974082).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization and literature review, Zhiqiang Ma and Jianyue Liu; methodology, Jianyue Liu; calculation, Jianyue Liu; writing and editing, Jianyue Liu and Zhiqiang Ma. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Reima Suomi
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., Ma, Z. Optimal quality regulation on the online health platform. Electron Markets 33, 50 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00670-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00670-3