An empirical analysis of experienced reviewers in online communities: what, how, and why to review | Electronic Markets Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

An empirical analysis of experienced reviewers in online communities: what, how, and why to review

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Online consumer reviews significantly impact market performance as potential customers rely heavily on these reviews for consumer decision making. Accordingly, experienced online reviewers, or highly motivated reviewers who account for the largest attribution of reviews, are proposed to be an important part of the online reviewing ecosystem. This research examines experienced reviewers in the online communities. Using empirical data, this study found that experienced reviewers tend to behave as experts with the aim to achieve a common good with rating and selection attributes similar to critics. Hence, results showed that experienced reviewers leave lower ratings, have less extremity in their ratings, prefer sophisticated products but do not prefer popular products. The female experienced reviewers are less generous than novice female reviewers and their generosity decreases more dramatically than males in the rating propensity as they become experienced reviewers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aakash, A., & Jaiswal, A. (2020). Segmentation and ranking of online reviewer community: the role of reviewers’ frequency, helpfulness, and recency. International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA), 12(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEA.2020010106 

  • Abubakar, A. M., Ilkan, M., & Sahin, P. (2016). eWOM, eReferral and gender in the virtual community. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(5), 692–710. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-05-2015-0090 

  • Anderson, E., & Simester, D. (2014). Reviews without a purchase: low ratings, loyal customers, and deception. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 51(3), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awad, N. F., & Ragowsky, A. (2008). Establishing trust in electronic commerce through online word of mouth: An examination across genders. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(4), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240404

  • Bae, S., & Lee, T. (2011). Gender differences in consumers’ perception of online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9072-y 

  • Baez, S., Flichtentrei, D., Prats, M., Mastandueno, R., García, A. M., Cetkovich, M., & Ibáñez, A. (2017). Men, women… who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition. PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0179336. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179336

  • Banerjee, S., Bhattacharyya, S., & Bose, I. (2017). Whose online reviews to trust? Understanding reviewer trustworthiness and its impact on business. Decision Support Systems, 96, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.01.006 

  • Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. (2018). Tracing the growth of IMDb reviewers in terms of rating, readability and usefulness. 4th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM). https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOMAN.2018.8392809

  • Bhattacharyya, S., Banerjee, S., & Bose, I. (2020). One size does not fit all: Rethinking recognition system design for behaviorally heterogeneous online communities. Information & Management, 57(7), 103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103245 

  • Blythe, J. (1999). Innovativeness and newness in high-tech consumer durables. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8(5), 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429910296028 

  • Bonner, S. E., Walther, B. R., & Young, S. M. (2003). Sophistication-related differences in investors’ models of the relative accuracy of analysts’ forecast revisions. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 679–706. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.679 

  • Boor, M. (1992). Relationships among ratings of motion pictures by viewers and six professional movie critics. Psychological Reports, 70(3 suppl), 1011–1021. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1992.70.3c.1011 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y., & Simester, D. (2011). Goodbye pareto principle, hello long tail: The effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales. Management Science, 57(8), 1373–1386. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1371 

  • Buchanan, K., Russo, R., & Anderson, B. (2014). Feeding back about eco-feedback: How do consumers use and respond to energy monitors? Energy Policy, 73, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.008

  • Carli, L. L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 725–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00238

  • Chakravarty, A., Liu, Y., & Mazumdar, T. (2010). The differential effects of online word-of-mouth and critics’ reviews on pre-release movie evaluation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24(3), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2010.04.001 

  • Chen, P.-Y., Dhanasobhon, S., & Smith, M. D. (2008). All reviews are not created equal: The disaggregate impact of reviews and reviewers at amazon. com. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.918083

  • Chen, P.-Y., Hong, Y., & Liu, Y. (2017). The value of multidimensional rating systems: Evidence from a natural experiment and randomized experiments. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2852

  • Chintagunta, P. K., Gopinath, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2010). The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Science, 29(5), 944–957. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0572 

  • Choi, H. S., & Leon, S. (2020). An empirical investigation of online review helpfulness: A big data perspective. Decision Support Systems, 139, 113403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113403 

  • Choi, H. S., Ko, M. S., Medlin, D., & Chen, C. (2018). The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic quality cues of digital video games on sales: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 106, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.12.005 

  • Chow, L. (2013). Top Reviewers On Amazon Get Tons Of Free Stuff. NPR. http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/10/29/241372607/top-reviewers-on-amazon-get-tons-of-free-stuff

  • Chu, S.-C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075

  • Clemons, E. K., Gao, G. G., & Hitt, L. M. (2006). When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230207 

  • Cloney, M., Hopkins, B., Shlobin, N., & Dahdaleh, N. S. (2018). Online ratings of neurosurgeons: An examination of web data and its implications. Neurosurgery, 83(6), 1143–1152. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy064 

  • Costa, A., Guerreiro, J., Moro, S., & Henriques, R. (2019). Unfolding the characteristics of incentivized online reviews. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 47, 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.12.006 

  • Cox, J. C., & Deck, C. A. (2006). When are women more generous than men? Economic Inquiry, 44(4), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/cbj042 

  • Cui, G., Lui, H.-K., & Guo, X. (2012). The effect of online consumer reviews on new product sales. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415170102 

  • Dahlerup, D. (2006). The story of the theory of critical mass. Politics & Gender, 2(4), 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X0624114X 

  • Debenedetti, S., & Larceneux, F. (2011). “The taste of others”: Divergences in tastes between professional experts and ordinary consumers of movies in France. Recherche Et Applications En Marketing (english Edition), 26(4), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/205157071102600404 

  • DellaPosta, D., & Kim, M. (2016). The fickle crowd: Selective differentiation in cultural markets. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.257

  • Dellarocas, C., & Narayan, R. (2006). What motivates consumers to review a product online? A study of the product-specific antecedents of online movie reviews. WISE

  • Dellarocas, C., Awad, N., & Zhang, X. M. (2004). Using online reviews as a proxy of word-of-mouth for motion picture revenue forecasting. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.620821

  • Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). Do online reviews matter?—An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 1007–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.04.001

  • Dunivin, Z., Zadunayski, L., Baskota, U., Siek, K., & Mankoff, J. (2020). Gender, soft skills, and patient experience in online physician reviews: A large-scale text analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(7), e14455. https://doi.org/10.2196/14455 

  • Dvorak, J. C. (2011, June 29). Are Amazon Reviews Corrupt? PC Reviews. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2387749,00.asp

  • Ebesu, T., & Fang, Y. J. I. R. J. (2017). Neural semantic personalized ranking for item cold-start recommendation. 20(2), 109-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-017-9295-9

  • Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2008). Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, 1, 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00057-1 

  • Elvers, P., Omigie, D., Fuhrmann, W., & Fischinger, T. (2015). Exploring the musical taste of expert listeners: Musicology students reveal tendency toward omnivorous taste. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1252. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01252 

  • Fandango. (2018). Movie Reviews. https://www.fandango.com/movie-reviews

  • Fang, B., Ye, Q., Kucukusta, D., & Law, R. (2016). Analysis of the perceived value of online tourism reviews: Influence of readability and reviewer characteristics. Tourism Management, 52, 498–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.07.018

  • Feng, S., Xing, L., Gogar, A., & Choi, Y. (2012). Distributional footprints of deceptive product reviews. ICWSM, 12, 98–105.

  • Filieri, R., Hofacker, C. F., & Alguezaui, S. J. C. I. H. B. (2018). What makes information in online consumer reviews diagnostic over time? The role of review relevancy, factuality, currency, source credibility and ranking score. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.039

  • Flanagin, A. J., Metzger, M. J., Pure, R., & Markov, A. (2011). User-generated ratings and the evaluation of credibility and product quality in ecommerce transactions. 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.474

  • Freddie. (2018, February 8). Get The Insight – How Reading Online Reviews Differs By Age And Gender. Review Monitoring. https://reviewmonitoring.com/get-the-insight-into-how-shoppers-read-online-reviews-differ-by-age-and-gender/

  • Fullerton, L. (2017, March 27). Online reviews impact purchasing decisions for over 93% of consumers, report suggests. The Drum. https://www.thedrum.com/news/2017/03/27/online-reviews-impact-purchasing-decisions-over-93-consumers-report-suggests

  • Furner, C. P., & Zinko, R. A. (2017). The influence of information overload on the development of trust and purchase intention based on online product reviews in a mobile vs. web environment: an empirical investigation. Electronic Markets, 27(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-016-0233-2 

  • Goldberg, A., & Vashevko, T. (2013). Social boundedness as market identity evidence from the film industry. Stanford Graduate School of Business Stanford.

  • Hayes, A. F., & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192961 

  • Hemphill, L., & Otterbacher, J. (2012). Learning the lingo?: Gender, prestige and linguistic adaptation in review communities. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145254

  • Herédia-Colaço, V., & do Vale, R. C. (2018). Seize the day or save the world? The importance of ethical claims and product nature congruity. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3342-0 

  • Hong, H., Xu, D., Wang, G. A., & Fan, W. (2017). Understanding the determinants of online review helpfulness: A meta-analytic investigation. Decision Support Systems, 102, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.06.007 

  • House, L., Lusk, J., Jaeger, S., Traill, W. B., Moore, M., Valli, C., Marrow, B., & Yee, W. M. (2005). Objective and subjective knowledge: Impacts on consumer demand for genetically modified foods in the United States and the European Union. AgBioForum, 7(3), 113-123.

  • Hunt, J. M., & Smith, M. F. (1987). The persuasive impact of two-sided selling appeals for an unknown brand name. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721949 

  • IESE Business School. (2015, April 29). How To Make Online Reviews Work For You. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/iese/2015/04/29/how-to-make-online-reviews-work-for-you/#2d6ddaac3f98

  • Jennings, E., Arlikatti, S., & Andrew, S. (2015). Determinants of emergency management decision support software technology: An empirical analysis of social influence in technology adoption. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 12(3), 603–626. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2014-0079 

  • Koh, N. S., Hu, N., & Clemons, E. K. (2010). Do online reviews reflect a product’s true perceived quality? An investigation of online movie reviews across cultures. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(5), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.04.001 

  • Koren, Y. (2010). Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/1721654.1721677 

  • Kunst, K., & Vatrapu, R. (2019). Understanding electronic word of behavior: Conceptualization of the observable digital traces of consumers’ behaviors. Electronic Markets, 29(3), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0301-x 

  • Lafky, J. (2014). Why do people rate? Theory and evidence on online ratings. Games and Economic Behavior, 87, 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2014.02.008 

  • Lampel, J., & Bhalla, A. (2007). The role of status seeking in online communities: Giving the gift of experience. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 434–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00332.x 

  • Lee, Y., Hosanagar, K., & Tan, Y. (2015). Do I follow my friends or the crowd? Information cascades in online movie ratings. Management Science, 61(9), 2241–2258. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2082 

  • Lee, D. (2020). Amazon’s top UK reviewers appear to profit from fake 5-star posts. Ars Technica. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/09/amazons-top-uk-reviewers-appear-to-profit-from-fake-5-star-posts/

  • Leung, X. Y., & Yang, Y. (2020). Are all five points equal? Scaling heterogeneity in hotel online ratings. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, 102539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102539

  • Lin, C.-Y., Liaw, S.-Y., Chen, C.-C., Pai, M.-Y., & Chen, Y.-M. (2017). A computer-based approach for analyzing consumer demands in electronic word-of-mouth. Electronic Markets, 27(3), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0262-5 

  • Lindbergh, B., & Arthur, R. (2020, September 4). Has Rotten Tomatoes Ever Truly Mattered? The Ringer. https://www.theringer.com/movies/2020/9/4/21422568/rotten-tomatoes-effective-on-box-office

  • Liu, Y., Huang, X., An, A., & Yu, X. (2008). Reviews are not equally important: Predicting the helpfulness of online reviews. 8th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), 443-452. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2008.94

  • Liu, Z., & Park, S. (2015). What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites. Tourism Management, 47, 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.020

  • Luca, M., & Zervas, G. (2016). Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Science, 62(12), 3412–3427. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2304 

  • Luca, M. (2016). Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper No. 12-016. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1928601

  • Lundy, D. E. (2010). A test of consensus in aesthetic evaluation among professional critics of modern music. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.2.h 

  • Ma, H., Kim, J. M., & Lee, E. (2019). Analyzing dynamic review manipulation and its impact on movie box office revenue. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 35, 100840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100840 

  • Mather, M., Canli, T., English, T., Whitfield, S., Wais, P., Ochsner, K., & Carstensen, L. L. (2004). Amygdala responses to emotionally valenced stimuli in older and younger adults. Psychological Science, 15(4), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00662.x 

  • Mathwick, C., & Mosteller, J. (2017). Online reviewer engagement: A typology based on reviewer motivations. Journal of Service Research, 20(2), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670516682088  

  • McAlone, N. (2017, March 16). Netflix will kill its 5-star rating system in favor of 'thumbs-up, thumbs-down' — here's why. Business Insider. http://www.businessinsider.com/netflix-ditches-5-star-ratings-2017-3

  • McCabe, K. (2018, June 7). Consumer Reviews - 2018 B2B Sales & Marketing Report. Learn Hub. https://learn.g2.com/consumer-reviews

  • McIntyre, S. H., McQuarrie, E. F., & Shanmugam, R. (2016). How online reviews create social network value: The role of feedback versus individual motivation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3–4), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2015.1095218 

  • Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2003). The sounds of social life: A psychometric analysis of students’ daily social environments and natural conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 857. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.857 

  • Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721420 

  • Nguyen, J., Armisen, A., Sánchez-Hernández, G., Casabayó, M., & Agell, N. (2020). An OWA-based hierarchical clustering approach to understanding users’ lifestyles. Knowledge-Based Systems, 190, 105308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105308 

  • Otterbacher, J. (2012). Gender, writing and ranking in review forums: A case study of the IMDb. Knowledge and Information Systems, 35(3), 645–664.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-012-0548-z 

  • Owen, L. (2011, June 24). What Shoppers Don’t Realize About Amazon’s Reviews. Gigaom. https://gigaom.com/2011/06/24/419-what-shoppers-dont-realize-about-amazons-reviews/

  • Park, M., & Yoo, J. (2018). Benefits of mass customized products: moderating role of product involvement and fashion innovativeness. Heliyon, 4(2), e00537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00537 

  • Peddibhotla, N. B., & Subramani, M. R. (2007). Contributing to public document repositories: A critical mass theory perspective. Organization Studies, 28(3), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076002

  • Pinch, T., & Kesler, F. (2011). How aunt Ammy gets her free lunch: A study of the top-thousand customer reviewers at amazon. com. Managing Overflow in Affluent Societies.

  • Plucker, J. A., Kaufman, J. C., Temple, J. S., & Qian, M. (2009). Do experts and novices evaluate movies the same way? Psychology & Marketing, 26(5), 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20283 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, 32(3), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570410699249 

  • Punj, G. N. (2013). Do consumers who conduct online research also post online reviews? A model of the relationship between online research and review posting behavior. Marketing Letters, 24(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9205-2 

  • Racherla, P., & Friske, W. (2012). Perceived ‘usefulness’ of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(6), 548–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.06.003 

  • Rand, D. G., Brescoll, V. L., Everett, J. A., Capraro, V., & Barcelo, H. (2016). Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(4), 389. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000154 

  • Reichelt, J., Sievert, J., & Jacob, F. (2014). How credibility affects eWOM reading: The influences of expertise, trustworthiness, and similarity on utilitarian and social functions. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(1–2), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2013.797758

  • Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Kardes, F. R., & Herr, P. M. (1992). The role of prior knowledge and missing information in multiattribute evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(1), 76–91.https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90005-R 

  • Santos, T., Lemmerich, F., Strohmaier, M., & Helic, D. (2019). What's in a review: Discrepancies between expert and amateur reviews of video games on metacritic. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359242

  • Schmidt, S., & Eisend, M. (2015). Advertising repetition: A meta-analysis on effective frequency in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 44(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, J., & Pokorny, M. (2014). The consumption characteristics of film. ResearchGate.

  • Seng, M. J. G., & Geertsema, J. (2018). Sharing practices, but what is the story? Exploring award-winning teachers’ conceptions of teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1373331 

  • Simmons, L. L., Mukhopadhyay, S., Conlon, S., & Yang, J. (2011). A computer aided content analysis of online reviews. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(1), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. T., & Mangold, W. G. (2012). Using Online Reviews in Creative Selling. Baylor University. https://www.baylor.edu/business_new/kellercenter/doc.php/195402.pdf

  • Sotiriadis, M. D., & Van Zyl, C. (2013). Electronic word-of-mouth and online reviews in tourism services: The use of twitter by tourists. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9108-1 

  • Subramani, M. R., & Peddibhotla, N. (2003). Contributing to document repositories-An examination of prosocial behavior. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

  • Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 31–46.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209033

  • Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Osterlind, S. J. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Pearsons, New York.

  • Vallurupalli, V., & Bose, I. (2020). Exploring thematic composition of online reviews: A topic modeling approach. Electronic Markets, 30(4) 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00397-5

  • Wang, Z. (2010). Anonymity, social image, and the competition for volunteers: A case study of the online market for reviews. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 10(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2523 

  • Wikström, S. (1996). Value creation by company-consumer interaction. Journal of Marketing Management, 12(5), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1996.9964422 

  • Wilkinson, A. (2019, May 23). Audience reviews on Rotten Tomatoes are easily manipulated. That’s about to change. Vox. https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/5/23/18637464/rotten-tomatoes-audience-verified-score-trolls-brigading-review-bombing

  • Williams, R. (2009). Using heterogeneous choice models to compare logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods & Research, 37(4), 531–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124109335735 

  • Williams, R. (2018). Panel data 3: Conditional logit/fixed effects logit models. University of Notre Dame, 1–5.

  • Woolf, M. (2014, June 17). A Statistical Analysis of 1.2 Million Amazon Reviews. Max Woolf's Blog. http://minimaxir.com/2014/06/reviewing-reviews/

  • Wu, P. F. (2019). Motivation crowding in online product reviewing: A qualitative study of amazon reviewers. Information & Management, 56(8), 103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.04.006 

  • Zhang, K. Z., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2014). Examining the moderating effect of inconsistent reviews and its gender differences on consumers’ online shopping decision. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.12.001 

  • Zhang, H., Yuan, X., & Song, T. H. (2020). Examining the role of the marketing activity and eWOM in the movie diffusion: The decomposition perspective. Electronic Commerce Research, 20(3), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09423-2 

  • Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.74.2.133 

  • Zhu, L., Yin, G., & He, W. (2014). Is this opinion leader’s review useful? Peripheral cues for online review helpfulness. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(4), 267.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Appalachian State University, 287 Rivers St, Boone, NC, 28608, USA

    Hoon S. Choi

  2. United States Naval Academy, 121 Blake Rd, Annapolis, MD, 21402, USA

    Michele Maasberg

Authors
  1. Hoon S. Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michele Maasberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoon S. Choi.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Christopher Patrick Holland

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, H.S., Maasberg, M. An empirical analysis of experienced reviewers in online communities: what, how, and why to review. Electron Markets 32, 1293–1310 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00499-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00499-8

Keywords

JEL classification