Emergency-level-based healthcare information offloading over fog network | Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Skip to main content
Log in

Emergency-level-based healthcare information offloading over fog network

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, the healthcare technologies continue to develop rapidly, especially various wearable Internet of Things (IoT) devices for body network have been invented one after another. The relevant products can already be easily purchased in the market such as the smart bracelet, smart blood pressure monitor and so on. These healthcare devices not only make users able to understand their own body information more in more detail but also provide a communication way to the hospital. It means that patients can obtain the professional medical prescription advice without going to the hospital in person because the health information can transmit to the medical cloud through any network interfaces. Additionally, both medical records of patients and prescription advice from doctors are stored in the cloud. In order to provide the better service quality, the use of fog in the network edge can quickly response the requests from the patients. The computing power of the fog node is less than the cloud. Therefore, balancing the trade-off between cloud and fog is very important. In this paper, we formulate an optimization problem about offloading then use the metaheuristic to find out the best policy. Moreover, we also design an emergency supporting measure. Simulation results show that the proposed methods can provide a more efficient healthcare service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu B, Da Xu L, Cai H, Xie C, Hu J, Bu F (2014) Ubiquitous data accessing method in IoT-based information system for emergency medical services. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 10(2):1578–1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ma Y -J, Zhang Y, Dung O M, Li R, Zhang D -Q (2015) Health internet of things: recent applications and outlook. Int J Intell Technol 16(2):351–362

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li T-M, Liao C-C, Cho H-H, Chien W-C, Lai C-F, Chao H-C (2017) An e-healthcare sensor network load-balancing scheme using SDN-SFC. In: Proceedings of IEEE 19th international conference on e-health networking, applications and services (Healthcom’17), pp 1–4

  4. Hamalainen M, Pirinen P, Iinatti J (2008) Taparugssanagorn, A UWB supporting medical ICT applications. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on ultra-wideband’08. ICUWB 2008, pp 15–16

  5. Sung WT, Chiang YC (2012) Improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for android medical care IOT using modified parameters. J Med Syst 36(6):3755–3763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rohokale VM, Prasad NR, Prasad R (2011) A cooperative internet of things (IoT) for rural healthcare monitoring and control. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on wireless communication, vehicular technology, information theory and aerospace & electronic systems technology (Wireless VITAE’11), pp 1–6

  7. Liu Y, Niu J, Yang L, Shu L (2014) eBPlatform: an IoT-based system for NCD patients homecare in China. In: Proceedings of IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM’14), pp 2448– 2453

  8. Amendola S, Lodato R, Manzari S, Occhiuzzi C, Marrocco G (2014) RFID technology for IoT-based personal healthcare in smart spaces. IEEE Internet Things J 1(2):144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wan J, Zou C, Ullah S, Lai C-F, Zhou M, Wang X (2013) Cloud-enabled wireless body area networks for pervasive healthcare. IEEE Netw 27(5):56–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tseng F-H, Cho H-H, Chang K-D, Li J-C, Shih TK (2018) Application-oriented offloading in heterogeneous networks for mobile cloud computing. Enterp Inf Syst 12(4):398– 413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitanov S, Janevski T (2018) Fog computing service orchestration mechanisms for 5G networks. J Internet Technol 19(1):297– 305

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amazing Healthcare Technology Innovations in 2016 (2016) https://getreferralmd.com/2016/01/healthcare-technology-2016/

  13. Fukuda O, Takahashi Y, Bu N, Okumura H, Arai K (2017) Development of an IoT-based prosthetic control system. J Rob Mechatronics 29(6):1049–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Balsalobre-Fernández C, Kuzdub M, Poveda-Ortiz P, del Campo-Vecino J (2016) Validity and reliability of the push wearable device to measure movement velocity during the back squat exercise. J Strength Cond Res 30 (7):1968–1974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuo CE, Liu YC, Chang DW, Young CP, Shaw FZ, Liang SF (2017) Development and evaluation of a wearable device for sleep quality assessment. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 64(7):1547– 1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yi S, Li C, Li Q (2015) A survey of fog computing: concepts, applications and issues. In: Proceedings of the 2015 workshop on mobile big data, pp 37–42

  17. Cho HH, Lai CF, Shih TK, Chao HC (2016) Learning-based data envelopment analysis for external cloud resource allocation. Mobile Netw Appl 21(5):846–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang W, Zhang Z, Chao H C (2017) Cooperative fog computing for dealing with big data in the internet of vehicles: architecture and hierarchical resource management. IEEE Commun Mag 55(12):60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luan TH, Gao L, Li Z, Xiang Y, Wei G, Sun L (2015) Fog computing: focusing on mobile users at the edge. arXiv:1502.01815

  20. Bao W, Yuan D, Yang Z, Wang S, Li W, Zhou BB, Zomaya AY (2017) Follow me fog: toward seamless handover timing schemes in a fog computing environment. IEEE Commun Mag 55(11):72–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lyu L, Nandakumar K, Rubinstein B, Jin J, Bedo J, Palaniswami M (2018) PPFA: Privacy preserving fog-enabled aggregation in smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

  22. Chiang M, Zhang T (2016) Fog and IoT: an overview of research opportunities. IEEE Internet Things J 3 (6):854–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ziegeldorf JH, Morchon OG, Wehrle K (2014) Privacy in the internet of things: threats and challenges. Secur Commun Netw 7(12):2728–2742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu CM, Chen CY, Chao HC (2017) Privacy-preserving multikeyword similarity search over outsourced cloud data. IEEE Syst J 11(2):385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Beyene YD, Jantti R, Tirkkonen O, Ruttik K, Iraji S, Larmo A, Torsner J (2017) NB-IoT technology overview and experience from cloud-RAN implementation. IEEE Wirel Commun 24(3):26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mathur A, Newe T, Rao M (2016) Defence against black hole and selective forwarding attacks for medical WSNs in the IoT. Sensors 16(1):118

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partly funded by the National Science Council of the R.O.C. under grants MOST 107-2221-E-197-005-MY3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsin-Hung Cho.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, C., Cho, HH. & Chen, CY. Emergency-level-based healthcare information offloading over fog network. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 13, 16–26 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-018-0715-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-018-0715-4

Keywords

Navigation