Reputation based approach for improved fairness and robustness in P2P protocols | Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Reputation based approach for improved fairness and robustness in P2P protocols

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peer-to-Peer (P2P) overlay networks have gained popularity due to their robustness, cost advantage, network efficiency and openness. Unfortunately, the same properties that foster their success, also make them prone to several attacks. To mitigate these attacks, several scalable security mechanisms which are based on the concepts of trust and reputation have been proposed. These proposed methods tend to ignore some core practical requirements that are essential to make them more useful in the real world. Some of such requirements include efficient bootstrapping of each newcomer’s reputation, and mitigating seeder(s) exploitation. Additionally, although interaction among participating peers is usually the bases for reputation, the importance given to the frequency of interaction between the peers is often minimized or ignored. This can result in situations where barely known peers end-up having similar trust scores to the well-known and consistently cooperative nodes. After a careful review of the literature, this work proposes a novel and scalable reputation based security mechanism that addresses the aforementioned problems. The new method offers more efficient reputation bootstrapping, mitigation of bandwidth attack and better management of interaction rate, which further leads to improved fairness. To evaluate its performance, the new reputation model has been implemented as an extension of the BitTorrent protocol. Its robustness was tested by exposing it to popular malicious behaviors in a series of extensive PeerSim simulations. Results show that the proposed method is very robust and can efficiently mitigate popular attacks on P2P overlay networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khan, A.M., Freitag, F. Rodrigues, L.: Current trends and future directions in community edge clouds. In: 4th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Networking (CloudNet), pp. 239–241. IEEE, Niagara Falls (2015)

  2. Baqer K, Anderson R (2015) Do you believe in tinker bell? The social externalities of trust. In: Cambridge international workshop on security protocols, pp. 224–236. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sarjaz BS, Abbaspour M (2013) Securing BitTorrent using a new reputation-based trust management system. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 6:86–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Konrath, M. A. Barcellos, M. P. Mansilha, R. B. : Attacking a swarm with a band of liars: evaluating the impact of attacks on bittorrent. In: 7th IEEE international conference on peer-to-peer computing, pp. 37–44. IEEE (2007)

  5. Naghizadeh A, Razeghi B, Radmanesh I, Hatamian M, Atani RE, Norudi ZN (2015) Counter attack to free-riders: filling a security hole in BitTorrent protocol. In: 12th IEEE international conference on networking, sensing and control, pp. 128–133. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dhungel P, Wu D, Ross KW (2009) Measurement and mitigation of BitTorrent leecher attacks. Comput Commun 32:1852–1861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wong KY, Yeung KH, Choi YM (2009) Solutions to swamp poisoning attacks in BitTorrent networks. In: 1st international MultiConference of engineers and computer scientists, pp. 360–363. IMECS

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aringhieri R, Damiani E, Vimercati D, De Capitani S, Paraboschi S, Samarati P (2006) Fuzzy techniques for trust and reputation management in anonymous peer-to-peer systems. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 57:528–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qureshi, A. Rifa-Pous, H. Megıas, D.:Electronic Payment and Encouraged Cooperation in a Secure and Privacy-Preserving P2P Content Distribution System. In: The 7th International Conferences on Advances in Multimedia, pp. 8–14. MMEDIA(2015)

  10. Kamvar SD, Schlosser MT, Garcia-Molina H (2003) The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on world wide web, 640–651. ACM press

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cornelli F, Damiani E, di Vimercati S, Paraboschi S, Samarati P (2002) Choosing rep- utable servents in a P2P network. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on world wide web, pp. 376–386. ACM press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dhungel P, Hei X, Wu D, Ross KW (2008) The seed attack: can bittorrent be nipped in the bud?. Technical report, Department of Computer and Information Science. In: Polytechnic institute of NYU

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dhungel P, Hei X, Wu D, Ross KW (2011) A measurement study of attacks on bittorrent seeds. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pp. 1–5. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montresor A, Jelasity M (2009) PeerSim: A scalable P2P simulator. In: 9th IEEE international conference on peer-to-peer computing, pp. 99–100. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nwebonyi FN, Ani UP (2015) DanielBYOD network: enhancing security through trust– aided access control mechanisms. International Journal of Cyber-Security and Digital Forensics 4:272–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gambetta D (2000) Can we trust trust?. Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. In: Gambetta, Diego (ed.) trust: making and breaking cooperative relations, electronic edition, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, pp. 213–237. University of Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jøsang A, Ismail R, Boyd C (2007) A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decis Support Syst 43:618–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. England P, Shi Q, Askwith B, Bouhafs F (2012) A survey of trust management in mobile ad-hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual post graduate symposium on the convergence of telecommunications, networking, and broadcasting. PGNET

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lilien L, Al-Alawneh A, Ben Othmane L (2010) The pervasive trust foundation for security in next generation networks. In: Proceedings of the 2010 workshop on new security paradigms, pp. 129–142. ACM

    Google Scholar 

  20. Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Swanson J, Lockwood K (2006) The value of reputation on eBay: a controlled experiment.: experimental economics, pp 79–101. Springer

  21. Gregg DG (2009) Outline reputation scores: how well are they understood?: journal of computer information systems, pp 90–97. Taylor & Francis

  22. Venkanna U, Agarwal JK, Velusamy RL (2015) A Cooperative Routing for MANET Based on Distributed Trust and Energy Management. In: A cooperative routing for MANET based on distributed trust and energy management.: wireless personal communications, pp. 961–979. Springer

  23. Josang A, Ismail R (2002) The beta reputation system. In: Proceedings of the 15th bled electronic commerce conference, pp. 2502–2511. Bled

    Google Scholar 

  24. Skopik F, Schall D, Dustdar S (2009) Start trusting strangers? Bootstrapping and prediction of trust. In: International conference on web information systems engineering, pp. 275–289. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yahyaoui H, Zhioua S (2011) Bootstrapping trust of web services through behavior observation. In: International conference on web engineering, pp. 652–659 springer Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sherchan W, Loke SW, Krishnaswamy S (2006) A fuzzy model for reasoning about reputa- tion in web services. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on applied computing, pp 1886–1892. ACM

    Google Scholar 

  27. Benincasa, C., Calden, A., Hanlon, E., Kindzerske, M., Law, K., Lam, E., Rhoades, J., Roy, I., Satz, M., Valentine, E., Whitaker, N.: Page Rank Algorithm. : Department of Mathematics and Statics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Research (2006)

  28. Josang A (1999) Trust-based decision making for electronic transactions. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic workshop on secure computer systems, pp. 496–502. NORDSEC

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pouwelse J, Garbacki P, Epema D, Sips H (2005) The bittorrent p2p file-sharing system: measurements and analysis. In: International workshop on peer-to-peer systems, pp. 205–216. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fattaholmanan A, Rabiee HR, Large-Scale Active A (2016) Measurement study on the effectiveness of piece-attack on BitTorrent networks. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput 13:509–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang L, Kangasharju J (2013) Measuring large-scale distributed systems: case of bittorrent mainline dht: IEEE thirteenth international conference on peer-to-peer computing (P2P), pp. 1–10. IEEE

  32. Dhungel, P., Wu, D., Schonhorst, B., Ross, K. W.: A measurement study of attacks on BitTorrent leechers. In: 7th international conference on peer-to-peer systems, pp. 7–15. ACM (2008)

  33. Adamsky F, Khayam SA, Jäger R, Rajarajan M (2014) Stealing bandwidth from BitTorrent seeders. Computers & Security 46:126–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Douceur JR (2002) The Sybil attack. In: International workshop on peer-to-peer systems, pp. 251–260. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  35. Alice C, Eric F (2005) Sybilproof reputation mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on economics of peer-to-peer systems. ACM Press, USA, pp 128–132

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kong J, Cai W, Wang L (2010) The evaluation of index poisoning in bittorrent. In: Second international conference on communication software and networks, pp. 382–386. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kong J, Cai W, Wang L, Zhao Q (2010) A study of pollution on BitTorrent. In: The 2nd international conference on computer and automation engineering (ICCAE), pp. 118–122. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  38. Su, M., Zhang, H., Fang, B., Du, X.: DDoS vulnerability of BitTorrent peer exchange extension: analysis and Defense In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communi- cations (ICC), pp. 1048–1052. IEEE(2012)

  39. Saini, N. K., Chaturvedi, A., Yadav, R.: Identifying Collusion Attacks in P2P Trust and Reputation systems.: Int J Comput Appl(IJCA) (2014)

  40. Ragab-Hassen, H., Jones, O., Galanis, N.: Rabit: a reputation architecture for BitTorrent. In: 2012 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 850–855. IEEE (2012)

  41. Ormándi R, Hegedus I, Csernai K, Jelasity M (2010) Towards inferring ratings from user behavior in BitTorrent communities. In: 19th IEEE international workshop on enabling technologies: infrastructures for collaborative enterprises (WETICE), pp. 217–222. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  42. Santos FR, da CC, Weverton L, Gaspary LP, Barcellos MP (2011) Funnel: choking polluters in bittorrent file sharing communities. In: 8th IEEE transactions on network and service management, pp. 310–321. IEEE, vol 8, pp 310–321

    Google Scholar 

  43. Riccardo P (2016) A trust and reputation method to mitigate a Sybil attack in Kademlia. Comput Netw 94:205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang J, Wu X, Guo N (2010) Ullrich, C.,Luo, H.: discouraging improper exploitation against seeds in BitTorrent swarms. In: International conference on cyber-enabled distributed computing and knowledge discovery (CyberC), pp. 235–242. IEEE press

    Google Scholar 

  45. Singh A, Liu L (2003) TrustMe: anonymous Management of Trust Relationships in Decen- tralized P2P systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on peer-to-peer computing (P2P 2003), pp. 142–149. IEEE press

    Google Scholar 

  46. Chen K, Liu G, Shen H, Qi F (2015) Sociallink: utilizing social network and transaction links for effective trust management in P2P file sharing systems. In: IEEE international conference on peer-to-peer computing (P2P). IEEE Press, Boston, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  47. Clarke I, Sandberg O, Toseland M, Verendel V (2010) Private communication through a network of trusted connections: The dark freenet. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vilhelm_Verendel/publication/228552753_Private_Communication_Through_a_Network_of_Trusted_Connections_The_Dark_Freenet/links/02e7e525f9eb66ba13000000/Communication-Through-a-Network-of-Trusted-Connections-The-Dark-Freenet.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2017

  48. Danezis G, Lesniewski-Laas C, Kaashoek MF, Anderson R (2005) Sybil-resistant DHT routing. In: European symposium on research in computer security, pp. 305–318. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yu Y, Xia C, Li Z (2015) A trust bootstrapping model for defense agents. In: IEEE international conference on communication software and networks (ICCSN), pp. 77–84. IEEE press

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tavakolifard M, Knapskog SJ (2011) Trust evaluation initialization using contextual in- formation. In: Proceedings of the international conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, pp. 1–8. ACM

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jiao H, Liu J, Li J, Liu C (2011) A framework for reputation bootstrapping based on reputation utility and game theories. In: 10th IEEE international conference on trust, security and privacy in computing and communications (TrustCom), pp. 344–351. IEEE press

    Google Scholar 

  52. Malik Z, Bouguettaya A (2009) Reputation bootstrapping for trust establishment among web services. IEEE Internet Comput 13:40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Oram A (2001) Peer-to-peer: harnessing the power of disruptive technologies. O’Reilly me- dia. In: Inc

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mónica D, Leitao J, Rodrigues L, Ribeiro C (2009) On the use of radio resource tests in wireless ad hoc networks. Technical report, proc. In: 3rd WRAITS

    Google Scholar 

  55. Borisov N (2006) Computational puzzles as Sybil defenses. In: 6th IEEE international con- ference on peer-to-peer computing, pp. 171–176. IEEE press

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ping W, Jing Q (2007) A mathematical trust model in e-commerce. In: International conference on multimedia and ubiquitous engineering (. MUE’07), pp. 644–649. IEEE press

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics 18:183–190

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Xinxing Z, Zhihong T, Luchen Z (2016) A measurement study on mainline DHT and magnet link: IEEE international conference on data science in cyberspace (DSC), pp. 11–19. IEEE

  59. Ripeanu M, Foster I, Iamnitchi A (2002) Mapping the gnutella network: properties of large- scale peer-to-peer systems and implications for system design. In: arXiv preprint cs/0209028

    Google Scholar 

  60. Fabrizio F, Pedrolli M (2008) A BitTorrent module for peersim. University of Trento, Technical report

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wang G, Musau F, Guo S, Abdullahi MB (2015) Neighbor similarity trust against sybil attack in P2P e-commerce.: IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems, pp. 824–833. IEEE

  62. Ferreira A, Huynen J, Lenzini G, Koenig V (2015) In cyber-space no one can hear you S-CREAM: a root cause analysis of technique for socio-technical attacks. In: 11th workshop on security and trust management, pp. 255–264. ESORICS

    Google Scholar 

  63. Marinelli E (2009) E.: hyrax: cloud computing on mobile devices using MapReduce. Carnegie-mellon univ Pittsburgh PA school of computer. science

  64. Rodrigues J (2017) Marques, E. RB: lopes, L.: Silva, F.: towards a middleware for mobile edge-cloud applications. In: Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on middleware for Edge Clouds & Cloudlets. Pp. 1. ACM

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially funded by project “NanoSTIMA: Macro-to-Nano Human Sensing: Towards Integrated Multimodal Health Monitoring and Analytics/NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000016” financed by the North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, and through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, & CRACS/INESC-TEC, Porto, Portugal

    Francis N. Nwebonyi, Rolando Martins & Manuel E. Correia

Authors
  1. Francis N. Nwebonyi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rolando Martins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manuel E. Correia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis N. Nwebonyi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nwebonyi, F.N., Martins, R. & Correia, M.E. Reputation based approach for improved fairness and robustness in P2P protocols. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 12, 951–968 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-018-0701-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-018-0701-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation