Abstract
150 years ago, in 1866, Ernst Haeckel published a book in two volumes called “Generelle Morphologie der Organismen” (General Morphology of Organisms) in which he formulated his biogenetic law, famously stating that ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. Here we describe Haeckel’s original idea and follow its development in the thinking of two scientists inspired by Haeckel, Alexei Sewertzoff and Adolf Naef. Sewertzoff and Naef initially approached the problem of reformulating Haeckel’s law in similar ways, and formulated comparable hypotheses at a purely descriptive level. But their theoretical viewpoints were crucially different. While Sewertzoff laid the foundations for a Darwinian evolutionary morphology and is regarded as a forerunner of the Modern Synthesis, Naef was one of the most important figures in ‘idealistic morphology’, usually seen as a type of anti-Darwinism. Both Naef and Sewertzoff aimed to revise Haeckel’s biogenetic law and came to comparable conclusions at the empirical level. We end our review with a brief look at the present situation in which molecular data are used to test the “hour-glass model”, which can be seen as a modern version of the biogenetic law.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
German original: „Ich acquirierte das Schwein sofort, ließ dem Niederstechen die Pfoten Abhacken u. schickte dieselben an Darwin“. Courtesy: Otto Zacharias in a letter to Ernst Haeckel, 21 May, 1877; Archive of the Ernst-Haeckel-House in Jena, correspondence Haeckel.
References
Bowler P (1996) Life’s Splendid Drama. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London
Breidbach O, Ghiselin M (eds) (2008) Fritz Müller. Für Darwin und andere Schriften zur Biologie. Olms, Hildesheim
Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex, vol 2. J. Murray, London
de Beer GR (1932) Book review: A.N. Sewertzoff ‘Morphologische Gesetzmässigkeiten der Evolution’. Nature 129:490–491
Domazet-Lošo T, Tautz D (2010) A phylogenetically based transcriptome age index mirrors ontogenetic divergence patterns. Nature 468:815–818
Duboule D (1994) Temporal colinearity and the phylotypic progression: a basis for the stability of a vertebrate Bauplan and the evolution of morphologies through heterochrony. Dev Suppl 1:135–142
Franz V (1927) Ontogenie und Phylogenie. Das sogenannte biogenetische Grundgesetz und die biometabolischen Modi (Abhandlungen zur Theorie der organischen Entwicklung, III). Springer, Berlin
Gilbert SF (2003) Evo-devo, devo-evo, and devgen-popgen. Biol Philos 18:347–352
Gould SJ (1977) Ontogeny and phylogeny. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Gourko H, Williamson DI, Tauber AI (eds) (2000) The Evolutionary biology papers of elie metchnikoff. Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Kluwer Acad. Publishers, Dordrecht
Grell KG (1979) Die gastraea-theorie. Medizinhistorisches J 14:275–291
Haeckel E (1866) Generelle morphologie der organismen, 2 Bde. Georg Reimer, Berlin
Haeckel E (1872) Die Kalkschwämme. Eine Monographie, 3 Bde. Georg Reimer, Berlin
Haeckel E (1874) Anthropogenie oder Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen. Gemeinverständliche wissenschaftliche Vorträge über die Grundzüge der menschlichen Keimes- und Stammesgeschichte. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig
Haeckel E (1875) Die Gastrula und die Eifurchung der Thiere. Jenaische Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaft 9:402–508
Haeckel E (1917) Kristallseelen: Studien über das anorganische Leben. Kröner Verlag, Leipzig
Hall BK (1984) Development mechanisms underlying the formation of atavisms. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 59:89–124
Hall BK (1995) Atavisms and atavistic mutations. Nat Genet 10:126–127
Hall BK (2000) Evo-devo or devo-evo—does it matter? Evol Dev 2:177–178
Hoßfeld U (2001) ≫Aufstieg und Fall≪ der Evolutionsmorphologie im deutschen Sprachraum: Aspekte des Recyclings eines interdisziplinären Konzepts. Gesnerus Swiss J Hist Med Sci 58:53–75
Hoßfeld U (2010) Ernst Haeckel. Biographienreihe absolute, Orange Press, Freiburg i. Br
Hoßfeld U (2016a) Geschichte der biologischen Anthropologie in Deutschland. Von den Anfängen bis in die Nachkriegszeit. 2. Auflage. Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart
Hoßfeld U (2016b) 150 Jahre Haeckel’sche Biologie. Blätter zur Landeskunde Thüringens, Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Erfurt, Heft 114
Hoßfeld U, Levit GS (2012) Alexej Nikolajevich Sewertzoff (1866-1936): Darwinist und Evolutionsmorphologe aus Leidenschaft. Biol unserer Zeit 42:133–134
Hoßfeld U, Olsson L (2003) The road from Haeckel. The Jena tradition in evolutionary morphology and the origin of “Evo-Devo”. Biol Philos 18:285–307
Hoßfeld U, Olsson L (2008) Entwicklung und Evolution—ein zeitloses Thema. Praxis der Naturwissenschaften/Biologie in der Schule—Themenheft. Evolution und Entwicklungsbiologie 57:4–8
Hoßfeld U, Olsson L, Breidbach O (eds) (2003) Carl Gegenbaur and evolutionary morphology. Theory Biosci 122:105–302
Hoßfeld U, Levit GS, Olsson L (2016) Haeckel reloaded: 150 Jahre “Biogenetisches Grundgesetz”. Biol unserer Zeit 46:190–195
Hoßfeld U, Watts E, Levit GS (2017) The first Darwinian tree of plants. Trends Plant Sci (CellPress) 22:100–102
Irie N, Kuratani S (2014) The developmental hourglass model: a predictor of the basic body plan? Development 141:4649–4655
Kalinka AT, Varga KM, Gerrard DT, Preibisch S, Corcoran DL, Jarrells J, Ohler U, Bergman CM, Tomancak P (2010) Gene expression divergence recapitulates the developmental hourglass model. Nature 468:811–814
Kolchinsky EI (2014) The unity of evolutionary theory in the 20th century divided world. Nestor-Historia, St. Petersburg
Krauße E (1984) Ernst Haeckel. Teubner, Leipzig
Kutschera U (2016) Haeckel’s 1866 tree of life and the origin of eukaryotes. Nature Microbiol 1:16114
Levin M, Anavy L, Cole AG et al (2016) The mid-developmental transition and the evolution of animal body plans. Nature 531:637–641
Levit GS (2007) The roots of Evo-Devo in Russia: is there a characteristic “Russian tradition”? Theory Biosci 4:131–148
Levit GS, Hoßfeld U (2006) The Forgotten “Old-Darwinian” Synthesis: The Theoretical System of Ludwig H. Plate (1862–1937). Internationale Zeitschrift für Geschichte und Ethik der Naturwissenschaft, Technik und Medizin (NTM), N.S. 14:9–25
Levit GS, Hoßfeld U (2011) Darwin without borders? Looking at “generalised Darwinism” through the prism of the “hourglass model”. Theory Biosci 130:299–312
Levit GS, Meister K (2005) Methodological ideologies in the German-language morphology. Yearb Eur Cult Sci 2:35–62
Levit GS, Meister K (2006) The history of essentialism vs. Ernst Mayr’s ‘Essentialism story’: a case study of German idealistic morphology. Theory Biosci 124:281–307
Levit GS, Hoßfeld U, Olsson L (2004) The integration of Darwinism and evolutionary morphology: Alexej Nikolajevich Sewertzoff (1866-1936) and the developmental basis of evolutionary change. J Exp Zool B (Mol Dev Evol) 302:343–354
Levit GS, Hoßfeld U, Olsson L (2015) Alexei Sewertzoff and Adolf Naef: revising Haeckel’s biogenetic law. Hist Philos Life Sci 36:357–370
Mayr E (2001) What evolution is. Basic Books, New York
Meister K (2005a) Metaphysische Konsequenz—Die idealistische Morphologie Edgar Dacqués. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologische und Paläontologische Abhandlungen 235:197–233
Meister K (2005b) Wilhelm Troll (1897–1978)—Tradierung, idealistischer Morphologie in den deutschen botanischen Wissenschaften des 20. Jahrhunderts. Hist Philos Life Sci 27:221–247
Müller F (1864) Für Darwin. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig
Naef A (1911) Studien zur generellen Morphologie der Mollusken. Ergebnisse und Fortschritte der Zoologie 3:73–164
Naef A (1913) Studien zur generellen Morphologie der Mollusken. 2. Das coelomsystem in seinen topographischen Beziehungen. Ergebnisse und Fortschritte der Zoologie 3:329–462
Naef A (1917) Die individuelle Entwicklung organischer Formen als Urkunde ihrer Stammesgeschichte. Gustav Fischer, Jena
Naef A (1919) Idealistische morphologie und phylogenetik. Gustav Fischer, Jena
Naef A (1923) Über systematische Morphologie und ihre Bedeutung für die Wissenschaft und Lehre vom Leben. Vierteljahresschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Zürich 68:387–397
Naef A (1931) Phylogenie der Tiere. In: Baur E, Hartmann M (eds) Handbuch der Vererbungswissenschaft, vol 3. Bornträger, Berlin
Naef A [1928] (2000) Cephalopoda. Embryology. English translation by S. v. Boletzky. Smithsonian Institute Libraries, Washington
Niklas KJ, Kutschera U (2017) From Goethe’s plant archetype via Haeckel’s Biogenetic Law to plant Evo-Devo 2016. Theory Biosci (in press)
Niklas KJ, Cobb ED, Kutschera U (2016) Haeckel’s biogenetic law and the land plant phylotypic stage. Bioscience 66:510–519
Nöthlich R, Wetzel N, Hoßfeld U, Olsson L (2006) “Ich acquirierte das Schwein sofort, ließ nach dem Niederstechen die Pfoten abhacken u. schickte dieselben an Darwin”—der Briefwechsel von Otto Zacharias mit Ernst Haeckel (1874–1898). Ann Hist Philos Biol 11:177–248
Olsson L (2005) Alternatives to Darwinism in Sweden: Lamarckism and idealistic morphology, disbelief in mutations and the poverty of selection. Jahrbuch für Europäische Wissenschaftskultur 1:47–60
Olsson L, Hoßfeld U (2007) Die Entwicklung: Die Zeit des Lebens. Ausgewählte Themen zur Geschichte der Entwicklungsbiologie. In: Höxtermann E, Hilger H (eds) Lebenswissen. Eine Einführung in die die Geschichte der Biologie. Natur & Text, Rangsdorf, pp 218–243
Olsson L, Hoßfeld U, Breidbach O (2009a) Preface. Between Ernst Haeckel and the homeobox: the role of developmental biology in explaining evolution. Theory Biosci 128:1–5
Olsson L, Hoßfeld U, Breidbach O (eds) (2009) Special issue “Between Ernst Haeckel and the Homeobox: the role of developmental biology in explaining evolution”. Theory Biosci 128:1–74
Olsson L, Levit GS, Hoßfeld U (2010) Evolutionary developmental biology: its concepts and history with a focus on Russian and German contributions. Naturwissenschaften 97:951–969
Raff R (1996) The shape of life: genes, development, and the evolution of animal form. Chicago University Press, Chicago, London
Reif WE (1998) Adolf Naefs idealistische Morphologie und das Paradigma typologischer Evolutionstheorien. Verhandlungen zur Geschichte und Theorie der Biologie 1:411–424
Reif WE, Junker T, Hoßfeld U (2000) The synthetic theory of evolution: general problems and the German contribution to the synthesis. Theory Biosci 119:41–91
Richards RJ (2008) The tragic sense of life: ernst haeckel and the struggle over evolutionary thought. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Rieppel O (2011a) Wilhelm Troll (1897–1978): idealistic morphology, physics, and phylogenetics. Hist Philos Life Sci 33:321–342
Rieppel O (2011b) Adolf Naef (1883–1949): systematic morphology and phylogenetics. J Zool Syst Evol Res 50:2–13
Rieppel O (2016) Phylogenetic systematics: Haeckel to Hennig. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton
Rieppel O, Williams DM, Ebach MC (2013) Adolf Naef (1883–1949): on foundational concepts and principles of systematic morphology. J Hist Biol 46:445–510
Schmalhausen II (1969) Problemy darwinizma. Nauka, Leningrad (in Russian)
Severtzov AS (1970) On the evolution of ontogenesis. J Gen Biol 31:222–235
Sewertzoff AN (1927) Über die Beziehung zwischen der Ontogenese und Phylogenese der Tiere. Jenaische Zeitschrift fu¨r Naturwissenschaften 63:51–180
Sewertzoff AN (1934) Morfologitcheskije zakonomernosti evoliutzonnogo prozessa. Sozialisticheskaja Rekonstruktzija i Nauka 83:21–37 (in Russian)
Sewertzoff AN (1931) Morphologische Gesetzmäßigkeiten der evolution. Gustav Fischer, Jena
Sewertzoff AN (1939) Morfologitcheskije zakonomernosti evoliutzii. Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk, Moscow-Leningrad (in Russian)
Sewertzoff AN (1949) Sobranije sotchinenij, vol 5. Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk, Moscow (in Russian)
Uschmann G (1956) Die Promotion von W.O. Kowalevsky in Jena, ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der evolutionistischen Paläontologie. EHH, G. Uschmanns Nachlass: B. 11, 15–17 (Hefter: Vorträge III)
Williams DM (2006) Ernst Haeckel and Louis Agassiz: trees that bite and their geographical dimension. In: Ebach M, Tangey R (eds) Biogeography in a Changing World. CRC Press Publisher, Boca Raton, pp 1–59
Acknowledgements
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant No. HO 2143, 9-2) and the KLI (Konrad-Lorenz-Institut) in Altenberg, Austria. for their support of our research into the history of EvoDevo. LO’s empirical EvoDevo research is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant No. OL 134/2-4). The Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena is thanked for granting LO a sabbatical leave. GSL is thankful for support from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Project 16-03-00555.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dedicated to the memory of Olaf Breidbach.
This article forms part of a special issue of Theory in Biosciences in commemoration of Olaf Breidbach.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olsson, L., Levit, G.S. & Hoßfeld, U. The “Biogenetic Law” in zoology: from Ernst Haeckel’s formulation to current approaches. Theory Biosci. 136, 19–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-017-0243-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-017-0243-4