Abstract
This article investigates whether editorial board members of selected economic journals publish their research papers in their ‘own’ journal. Journals were selected from the Journal Citation Report® from the categories Business; Business, Finance; and Economics. Only research articles published between 2012 and 2015 were included in the analysis. We recorded ratios concerning the share of articles authored by editorial board members, the share of editorial board members publishing in their own journals and ratios representing their publication output. The average share of articles authored by editorial board members ranges from 0.6 to 17.5%. The average share of editorial board members publishing in their own journals ranges from 5.6 to 24.4%. Considering only editorial board members publishing in their own journals, the share of their articles in their journals ranges from 8.2 to 71.4%. While the share of board members publishing only in their own journals, to the number of board members publishing in their own journals, the ratio in a quarter of journals is equal to zero, with a maximum reach of 85.7%. All observed ratios are significantly positively correlated with the gap between impact factor and impact factor without Journal Self Cites; and negatively correlated with the Article Influence Score. A cluster of journals in which a high proportion of editorial board members publish and simultaneously these members publish in their own journal at a high rate was identified.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The probability of the paper to be read and to have an impact is higher, when the journal has a wider readership (Faria 2005).
References
Arnold, E. (2011). International audit of research, development and innovation in the Czech Republic: Synthesis report. http://audit-vav.reformy-msmt.cz/download-document/58-synteticka-zaverecna-zprava-aj. Accessed April 3, 2017.
Axarloglou, K., & Theoharakis, V. (2003). Diversity in economics: An analysis of journal quality perceptions. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1402–1423. doi:10.1162/154247603322752584.
Baccini, A., & Barabesi, L. (2011). Seats at the table: The network of the editorial boards in information and library science. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3), 382–391. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.012.
Barta, J., & Považan, M. (2012). Publication activity of new Slovak professors in economics and its international reception. Prague Economic Papers, 21(3), 377–387. doi:doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.430.
Bence, V., & Oppenheim, C. (2004). The influence of peer review on the research assessment exercise. Journal of Information Science, 30(4), 347–368. doi:10.1177/0165551504045854.
Besancenot, D., Huynh, K. V., & Faria, J. R. (2012). Search and research: The influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality. Theory and Decision, 73, 687–702. doi:10.1007/s11238-012-9314-7.
Bošnjak, L., Puljak, L., Vukojević, K., & Marušić, A. (2011). Analysis of a number and type of publications that editors publish in their own journals: Case study of scholarly journals in Croatia. Scientometrics, 86, 227–233. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0207-7.
Boyes, W. J., Happel, S. K., & Hogan, T. D. (1984). Publish or perish: Fact or fiction? The Journal of Economic Education, 15(2), 136–141. doi:10.1080/00220485.1984.10845061.
Brogaard, J., Engelberg, J., & Parsons, C. A. (2014). Networks and productivity: Causal evidence from editor rotations. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 251–270. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.006.
Chew, M., Villanueva, E. V., & Van Der Weyden, M. B. (2007). Life and times of the impact factor: Retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994–2005) and their editors’ views. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100, 142–150. doi:10.1177/014107680710000313.
Colussi, T. (2015). Social ties in Academia: A friend is a treasure. Institute for the Study of Labor, Discussion Paper No. 9414.
Donovan, B. (1998). The truth about peer review. ICSU Press Workshop. http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/icsu/donovanppr.htm. Accessed January 15, 2017.
Faria, J. R. (2005). The game academics play: Editors versus authors. Bulletin of Economic Research, 57(1), 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8586.2005.00212.x.
Fiala, D., & Ho, Y.-S. (2016). Comparison of Czech and Slovak independent research in the 21st century. Current Science, 110(8), 1524–1531. doi:10.18520/cs/v110/i8/1524-1531.
Hardin, W. G., Liano, K., Chan, K. C., & Fok, R. C. W. (2008). Finance editorial board membership and research productivity. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 31, 225–240. doi:10.1007/s11156-007-0067-2.
Harzing, A., & Metz, I. (2011). Gender and geographic diversity in the editorial board of the journal of international business studies. AIB Insights, 11(3), 3–7.
Hilmer, M. J., & Hilmer, C. E. (2011). Do editors favor their students’ work? A test of undue favoritism in top economics journals. Economics Bulletin, 31(1), 53–65.
Hoey, J. (1999). When editors publish in their own journals. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(11), 1412–1413.
Jurajda, Š., Kozubek, S., Münich, D., & Škoda, S. (2015a). An international comparison of the quality of academic publication output in the Czech Republic. Praha: Národohospodářský ústav AV ČR.
Jurajda, Š., Kozubek, S., Münich, D., & Škoda, S. (2015b). Medzinárodné porovnanie kvality publikačného výkonu vedných odborov na Slovensku. Praha: Národohospodářský ústav AV ČR.
Jurajda, Š., & Münich, D. (2015). Oborová publikační výkonnost pracovišť výzkumných organizací v České republice v letech 2008–2012. Praha: Národohospodářský ústav AV ČR.
Laband, D. N. (1990). Is there value-added from the review process in economics? Preliminary evidence from authors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(2), 341–352. doi:10.2307/2937790.
Laband, D. N., & Piette, M. J. (1994). Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors. Journal of Political Economy, 102(1), 194–203.
Lowe, D. J., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2009). Scholarly achievement and accounting journal editorial board membership. Journal of Accounting Education, 27, 197–209. doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2010.07.004.
Luty, J., Arokiadass, S. M. R., Easow, J. M., & Anapreddy, J. R. (2009). Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 200–202. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.026740.
Macháček, M. (2004). Komparace tematické struktury časopiseckých publikací českých a evropských ekonomů (1999–2002). Politická Ekonomie, 52(1), 74–90. doi:10.18267/j.polek.451.
Macháček, M., & Kolcunová, E. (2005). Publish or perish? On the importance of publishing on the economic sciences tenure-track in the Czech Republic. Finance a úvěr—Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 55(11–12), 563–577.
Macháček, M., & Kolcunová, E. (2008). Hirsch index and rankings of Czech economists. Politická Ekonomie, 56(2), 229–241. doi:10.18267/j.polek.638.
Macháček, M., Kolcunová, E., & Závacká, J. (2015). Publishing performance of Czech Academic Economists: (just) a matter of time? In M. R. López, & J. Graves (Eds.), Investigaciones de economía de la educación (vol 10(10), pp. 271–283).
Mani, J., Makarević, J., Juengel, E., Ackermann, H., Nelson, K., Bartsch, G., et al. (2013). I publish in I edit?—Do editorial board members of urologic journals preferentially publish their own scientific work? PLoS ONE, 8(12), 1–5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083709.
Medoff, M. H. (2003). Editorial favoritism in economics? Southern Economic Journal, 70(2), 425–434. doi:10.2307/3648979.
Münich, D. (2006). Recent publication productivity of czech economists. Finance a úvěr—Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 56(11–12), 522–533.
Nazim Ali, S., Young, H. C., & Ali, N. M. (1996). Determining the quality of publications and research for tenure or promotion decisions: A preliminary checklist to assist. Library Review, 45(1), 39–53. doi:10.1108/00242539610107749.
Oleinik, A. (2012). Publication patterns in Russia and the West compared. Scientometrics, 93(2), 533–551. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0698-5.
Oleinik, A. (2014). Conflict(s) of interest in peer review: Its origins and possible solutions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(1), 55–75. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9426-z.
Pagel, P. S., & Hudetz, J. A. (2011). Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: Correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 107(3), 357–361. doi:10.1093/bja/aer191.
Rösing, C. K., Junges, R., & Haas, A. N. (2014). Publication rates of editorial board members in oral health journals. Brazilian Oral Research, 28(1), 1–5. doi:10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.0042.
Roth, W.-M. (2002). Editorial power/authorial suffering. Research in Science Education, 32(2), 215–240. doi:10.1023/A:1016030212572.
Shugan, S. M. (2007). The editor’s secrets. Marketing Science, 26(5), 589–595. doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0309.
Stigler, G. J., Stigler, S. M., & Friedland, C. (1995). The journals of economics. Journal of Political Economy, 103(2), 331–359.
Thompson, P. J. (2009). How to choose the right journal for your manuscript? Chest, 132(3), 1073–1076. doi:10.1378/chest.07-1340.
Vanecek, J. (2014). The effect of performance-based research funding on output of R&D results in the Czech Republic. Scientometrics, 98, 657–681. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1061-1.
Walters, W. H. (2015). Do editorial board members in library and information science publish disproportionately in the journals for which they serve as board members? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 46(4), 343–354. doi:10.3138/jsp.46.4.03.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by Research Program of the Department of Accounting and Finance (RVO160).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zdeněk, R. Editorial Board Self-Publishing Rates in Czech Economic Journals. Sci Eng Ethics 24, 669–682 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9922-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9922-2