Reflection on the Fazlul Sarkar versus PubPeer (“John Doe”) Case | Science and Engineering Ethics
Skip to main content

Reflection on the Fazlul Sarkar versus PubPeer (“John Doe”) Case

  • Letter
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. http://www.biomedicale.parisdescartes.fr/physiocer/?page_id=2983.

  2. http://www.ibens.ens.fr/spip.php?rubrique32&lang=en.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

The author has commented anonymously on PubPeer and as a registered user.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teixeira da Silva, J.A. Reflection on the Fazlul Sarkar versus PubPeer (“John Doe”) Case. Sci Eng Ethics 24, 323–325 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9863-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9863-1