Support vector machine for classification of walking conditions using miniature kinematic sensors | Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Support vector machine for classification of walking conditions using miniature kinematic sensors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A portable gait analysis and activity-monitoring system for the evaluation of activities of daily life could facilitate clinical and research studies. This current study developed a small sensor unit comprising an accelerometer and a gyroscope in order to detect shank and foot segment motion and orientation during different walking conditions. The kinematic data obtained in the pre-swing phase were used to classify five walking conditions: stair ascent, stair descent, level ground, upslope and downslope. The kinematic data consisted of anterior–posterior acceleration and angular velocity measured from the shank and foot segments. A machine learning technique known as support vector machine (SVM) was applied to classify the walking conditions. SVM was also compared with other machine learning methods such as artificial neural network (ANN), radial basis function network (RBF) and Bayesian belief network (BBN). The SVM technique was shown to have a higher performance in classification than the other three methods. The results using SVM showed that stair ascent and stair descent could be distinguished from each other and from the other walking conditions with 100% accuracy by using a single sensor unit attached to the shank segment. For classification results in the five walking conditions, performance improved from 78% using the kinematic signals from the shank sensor unit to 84% by adding signals from the foot sensor unit. The SVM technique with the portable kinematic sensor unit could automatically recognize the walking condition for quantitative analysis of the activity pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Begg R, Kamruzzaman J (2005) A machine learning approach for automated recognition of movement patterns using basic, kinetic and kinematic gait data. J Biomech 38(3):401–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Begg RK, Palaniswami M, Owen B (2005) Support vector machines for automated gait classification. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52(5):828–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boser BE, Guyon IM, Vapnik VN (1992) A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: 5th Annual ACM Workshop on COLT, Pittsburgh, pp 144–152

  4. Chau T (2001) A review of analytical techniques for gait data. Part 1: Fuzzy, statistical and fractal methods. Gait Posture 13(1):49–66

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chau T (2001) A review of analytical techniques for gait data. Part 2: neural network and wavelet methods. Gait Posture 13(2):102–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Christopher MB (2007) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman KL, Smith DG, Boone DA, Joseph AW, del Aguila MA (1999) Step activity monitor: long-term, continuous recording of ambulatory function. J Rehabil Res Dev 36(1):8–18

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coley B, Najafi B, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Aminian K (2005) Stair climbing detection during daily physical activity using a miniature gyroscope. Gait Posture 22(4):287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cortes C, Vapnik V (2005) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dai R, Stein RB, Andrews BJ, James KB, Wieler M (1996) Application of tilt sensors in functional electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 4(2):63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dejnabadi H, Jolles BM, Casanova E, Fua P, Aminian K (2006) Estimation and visualization of sagittal kinematics of lower limbs orientation using body-fixed sensors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(7):1385–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ethem A (2004) Introduction to machine learning (adaptive computation and machine learning). Mass: MIT Press, Cambridge

  13. Haeuber E, Shaughnessy M, Forrester LW, Coleman KL, Macko RF (2004) Accelerometer monitoring of home- and community-based ambulatory activity after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85(12):1997–2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansen M, Haugland MK, Sinkjaer T (2004) Evaluating robustness of gait event detection based on machine learning and natural sensors. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 12(1):81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Herren R, Sparti A, Aminian K, Schutz Y (1999) The prediction of speed and incline in outdoor running in humans using accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31(7):1053–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kamruzzaman J, Begg RK (2006) Support vector machines and other attern recognition approaches to the diagnosis of cerebral palsy gait. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(12 Pt 1):2479–2490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lau H, Tong K (2008) The reliability of using accelerometer and gyroscope for gait event identification on persons with dropped foot. Gait Posture 27:248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Luinge HJ, Veltink PH (2005) Measuring orientation of human body segments using miniature gyroscopes and accelerometers. Med Bio Eng Comput 43(2):273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mayagoitia RE, Nene AV, Veltink PH (2002) Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems. J Biomech 35(4):537–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Michalski RS, Carbonell JG, Mitchell TM (1983) Machine learning: an artificial intelligence approach, vol I. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos

  21. Michalski RS, Kodratoff Y, Bareiss R (1990) Machine learning: an artificial intelligence approach, vol III. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo

  22. Najafi B, Aminian K, Loew F, Blanc Y, Robert PA (2002) Measurement of stand-sit and sit-stand transitions using a miniature gyroscope and its application in fall risk evaluation in the elderly. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49(8):843–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pappas IP, Popovic MR, Keller T, Dietz V, Morari M (2001) A reliable gait phase detection system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 9(2):113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Perl J (2004) A neural network approach to movement pattern analysis. Hum Mov Sci 23(5):605–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Riener R, Rabuffetti M, Frigo C (2002) Stair ascent and descent at different inclinations. Gait Posture 15(1):32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sabatini AM, Martelloni C, Scapellato S, Cavallo F (2005) Assessment of walking features from foot inertial sensing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52(3):486–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shimada Y, Ando S, Matsunaga T, Misawa A, Aizawa T, Shirahata T, Itoi E (2005) Clinical application of acceleration sensor to detect the swing phase of stroke gait in functional electrical stimulation. Tohoku J Exp Med 207(3):197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Song KM, Bjornson KF, Cappello T, Coleman K (2006) Use of the StepWatch activity monitor for characterization of normal activity levels of children. J Pediatr Orthop 26(2):245–249

    Google Scholar 

  29. Terrier P, Aminian K, Schutz Y (2001) Can accelerometry accurately predict the energy cost of uphill/downhill walking? Ergonomics 44(1):48–62

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tong K, Granat MH (1999) A practical gait analysis system using gyroscopes. Med Eng Phys 21(2):87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tong KY, Mak AF, Ip WY (2003) Command control for functional electrical stimulation hand grasp systems using miniature accelerometers and gyroscopes. Med Biol Eng Comput 41(6):710–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vapnik V (1995) The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Williamson R, Andrews BJ (2000) Gait event detection for FES using accelerometers and supervised machine learning. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 8(3):312–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang K, Werner P, Sun M, Pi-Sunyer FX, Boozer CN (2003) Measurement of human daily physical activity. Obes Res 11(1):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (grant no. PolyU 5284/06E).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Hong-Yin Lau & Kai-Yu Tong

  2. Research Institute of Innovative Products and Technologies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Hailong Zhu

Authors
  1. Hong-Yin Lau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kai-Yu Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hailong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai-Yu Tong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lau, HY., Tong, KY. & Zhu, H. Support vector machine for classification of walking conditions using miniature kinematic sensors. Med Biol Eng Comput 46, 563–573 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0327-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0327-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation