Measuring urban sprawl in Beijing with geo-spatial indices | Journal of Geographical Sciences Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring urban sprawl in Beijing with geo-spatial indices

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concerning about the rapid urban growth in recent China, this study takes Beijing as a case and puts forward that urban sprawl can be measured from spatial configuration, urban growth efficiency and external impacts, and then develops a geo-spatial indices system for measuring sprawl, a total of 13 indicators. In order to calculate these indices, different sources data are selected, including land use maps, former land use planning, land price and floor-area-ratio samples, digitized map of the highways and city centers, population and GDP statistical data, etc. Various GIS spatial analysis methods are used to spatialize these indices into 100m × 100m cells. Besides, an integrated urban sprawl index is calculated by weight sum of these 13 indices. The application result indicates that geo-spatial indices system can capture most of the typical features and interior differentia of urban sprawl. Construction land in Beijing has kept fast growing with large amount, low efficiency and disordered spatial configuration, indicating a typical sprawling tendency. The following specific sprawl features are identified by each indicator: (1) typical spatial configuration of sprawling: obvious fragmentation and irregularity of landscape due to unsuccessful enforcement of land use planning, unadvisable pattern of typical discontinuous development, strip development and leapfrog development; (2) low efficiency of sprawl: low development density, low population density and economic output in newly developed area; and (3) negative impacts on agriculture, environment and city life. According to the integrated sprawl index, the sprawling amount in the northern part is larger than that in the southern, but the sprawling extent is in converse case; most sprawling area include the marginal area of the near suburbs and the area between highways, etc. Four sprawling patterns are identified: randomly expansion at urban fringe, strip development along or between highways, scattered development of industrial land, leapfrog development of urban residence and industrial area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beijing Statistics Bureau, Survey Office of the National Bureau of Statistics in Beijing. 1% Sample Population Survey Report in 2005. http://www.bijstats.gov.cn/

  • Beijing Statistics Bureau, Survey Office of the National Bureau of Statistics in Beijing. Beijing National Economic and Social Development Report in 2005 and Tenth Five-Year Plan. http://www.bjstats.gov.cn

  • Burchell R W, Shad N A, 1999. The evolution of the sprawl debate in the United States. West Northwest, 5(2): 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlo Lavalle, N McCormick, Kasanko M et al., 2002. Monitoring, planning and forecasting dynamics in European areas: The territorial approach as key to implement European policies. Technical Report of MOLAND Program, 1-8, http://moland.jrc.it/

  • Chen Benqing, Xu Hanqiu, 2005. Urban expansion and its driving force analysis using romote sensed data: A case of Xiamen City. Economic Geography, 25(1): 79–83. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Longqian, Guo Dazhi, Hu Zhaoling, 2004. Research on spatial differentiation of urban growth using multi-temporal landsat thematic mapper satellite remote sensing images. Journal of China Coal Society, 29(3): 308–312. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs A, 1998. How America’s cities are growing: The Big Picture. Brookings Review, 16(4): 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward Glaeser, Matthew Kahn, Chenghuan Chu, 2001. Job Sprawl: Employment Location in U.S. Metropolitan Areas, Survey Series of Center for Urban & Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution, 1–8.

  • Ewing R, 1997. Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1): 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Zuojiang, Cheng Jicheng, Li Qi, 1997. Study on urban growth by using RS and GIS analysis. Remote Sensing Information, (3): 12–16. (in Chinese)

  • George Galster, Royce Hanson, Hal Wolman et al., 2000. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Working Paper of Fannie Mae, 1-38.

  • Gerald Shoultz, 2005. ASPH/CDC Fellow, National Center for Health Statistics, Measures of Sprawl Applied to Urban and Rural Areas, and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: A Bayesian Spatial Analysis. Population Association of American Annual Meeting Report, 1-3.

  • He Chunyang, Chen Ji, Shi Peijun, 2003. City expansion model of metropolitan area in China: A case study of Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 58(2): 294–304. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes F Patrick. Rockies Sprawl Index, Annual Research Report of the Rockies Project, 2005. 61–70. http://www.coloradocollege.edu/.

  • Huang Yue, Chen Xi, Bao Anming et al., 2006. Urban sprawl pattern and spatial features of Urümqi City during the last 15 years. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 28(3): 364–370. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • John E Hasse, Richard G Lathrop, 2003. Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl. Applied Geography, 23: 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline J D, 2000. Comparing states with and without growth management analysis based on indicators with policy implications comment. Land Use Policy, 17: 349–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Shenghe, Wu Chuanjun, Shen Hongquan, 2000. Beijing urban land growth pattern based on GIS analysis. Acta Geographica Sinica, 55(4): 407–416. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Shenghe, 2002. Spatial pattern and dynamic mechanism of urban land use growth. Progress in Geography, 21(1): 43–50. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Datao. Rash urbanization process will lead to endless negative impacts. December 31, 2006. (in Chinese). http://www.cas.ac.cn/html/Dir/2006/12/30/14/65/68.htm

  • Marjo Kasanko et al., 2006. Are European cities becoming dispersed? A comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77: 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson A C, 1999. Comparing states with and without growth management: Analysis based on indicators with policy implications. Land Use Policy, 16: 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul M Torrens, Marina Alberti, 2000. Measuring Sprawl. Working Paper Series of Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, 1–43.

  • Reid Ewing, Rolf Pendall, Don Chen. Measuring Sprawl and Its Impacts, 2002. 1–42. http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org.

  • Richard Moe, 1993. National trust for historic preservation, from communities at risk: The consequences of Sprawl.

  • Sierra Club, 1998. The Dark Side of the American Dream. Research Report. http://www.sierraclub. org/sprawl/report98/report.asp.

  • Sun Chengren. Smart growth, the future of Chinese cities. Ministers and Governors Forum, 2003-11-29. (in Chinese)

  • USA Today. A Comprehensive Look at Sprawl in America, 2001. http://www.usatoday.com/news/sprawl/main.htm.

  • Xiao Jieying, Ge Jingfeng, Shen Yanjun, 2003. Analysis on urban land use sprawl by using GIS: The case of Shijiazhuang City, China. Geographical Research, 22(6): 789–798. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • XinHua Net. Beijing Channel, Beijing Introduction. http://www.bj.xinhuanet.com/bjpd-whsd/sq.htm

  • Xu Xiaoli, Shi Peijun, He Chunyang, 2002. The urbanization process comparison of Beijing and Shenzhen. Advance in Earth Sciences, 17(2): 221–229. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan Jinming, 2005. Land Resource Management Calls for Rational Notion. People Forum, (6): 40–41. (in Chinese)

  • Yang Yingbao, Jiang Nan, Su Weizhong, 2005. Dynamics of landscape ecology in Nanjing city revealed by RS and GIS. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 14(1): 34–39. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Bo, 2004. Study on Urban Growth Management in China. Beijing: Xinhua Press. 56–57. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Liqua, Wu Jiaping, Zhen Yu, 2004. A GIS-based gradient analysis of the urban landscape pattern of Shanghai Metropolitan Region. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 28(1): 78–85. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Ning, Wang Jiandi, 2005. Spatial configuration change of urban growth in Hangzhou. Zhejiang Economy, (16): 59. (in Chinese)

  • Zong Yueguang, Zhou Shangyi, Zhang Zhenshi, 2002. Spatial characteristics of suburbanization and its developing strategies in Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 57(2): 135–142. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiang Fang.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 40571056; Sustentation Fund on Doctoral Thesis from Beijing Science and Technology Committee, No.ZZ0608

Author: Jiang Fang (1979–), Ph.D, specialized in the study on regional and urban sustainable development, land use planning and urban agriculture.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, F., Liu, S., Yuan, H. et al. Measuring urban sprawl in Beijing with geo-spatial indices. J. Geogr. Sci. 17, 469–478 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-007-0469-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-007-0469-z

Keywords

Navigation