An embedded testbed architecture to evaluate autonomous car driving | Intelligent Service Robotics Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

An embedded testbed architecture to evaluate autonomous car driving

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Intelligent Service Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The progress in autonomous car driving or also called Advanced Driving Assistance Systems (ADAS) has recently received an increasing attention in car industries. Thus, many autonomous car models are recently developed and some are even commercialized. However, they are still not ready to enter our daily life since they lack efficiency and reliability. In this sense, to obtain efficient and reliable systems, the evaluation process plays an important role. Nowadays, the evaluation is strongly related to the number of kilometers of drive. However, in order to make a comprehensive evaluation of such systems, in addition to the number of kilometers, each component should also be tested. In this study, we focused on developing a system that is able to evaluate each component of ADAS. We defined a versatile architecture that simplifies the evaluation of different types of ADAS. Several evaluation scenarios are shown and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. United Nations. Convention on Road Traffic (Vienna) (Online). Available http://www.unece.org/trans/conventn/crt1968e. Last Access on 14/11/2016.

  2. These laws are called legal safety.

  3. The autonomous car concept is also known as a driverless car [11], self-driving car [12, 13] and robot car [14]. However, we use autonomous car throughout this article.

  4. Light Detection and Ranging.

  5. Simultaneous Localization and Mapping.

  6. http://www.systematic-paris-region.org/fr/projets/quasper-rd. Last Access on 14/11/2016.

  7. http://www.haveit-eu.org. Last Access on 14/11/2016.

  8. http://www.citymobil-project.eu. Last Access on 14/11/2016.

  9. http://www.predit.prd.fr/predit4/projet/40479. Last Access on 14/11/2016.

  10. http://www.sartre-project.eu. Last Access on 14/11/2016.

  11. http://www.opendrive.org/.

  12. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEEpYXbiUg0. Last Access on 14/11/2016.

  13. http://www.eweek.com/innovation/induct-now-selling-navia-first-self-driving-commercial-vehicle.html. Last Access on 14/11/2016.

References

  1. Curry A, Hodgson T, Kelnar R, Wilson A (2006) Intelligent infrastructure futures: the scenarios—towards 2055. Department of Trade and Industry, research report

  2. Wu SS (2011) Unmanned vehicles and us product liability law. J Law Inf Sci 21(2):234

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richard B (2005) Intelligent vehicle technology and trends. Artech House Publishers, 05 (Online). http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike09-20&path=ASIN/1580539114

  4. Campbell M, Egerstedt M, How JP, Murray RM (2010) Autonomous driving in urban environments: approaches, lessons and challenges. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 368(1928):4649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mark C, Magnus E, How JP, Richard MM (2010) Autonomous driving in urban environments: approaches, lessons and challenges. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 368(1928):1471–2962

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burton D, Delaney A, Newstead S, Logan D, Fildes B (2004) Effectiveness of abs and vehicle stability control system. Royal Automobile Club of Victoria (RACV), research report

  7. Moon S, Moon I, Yi K (2009) Design, tuning, and evaluation of a full-range adaptive cruise control system with collision avoidance. Control Eng Pract 17(4):442–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Visvikis C, Smith T, Pitcher M, Smith R (2008) Study on lane departure warning and lane change assistant systems. In: Transportation Research Laboratory

  9. Benine-Neto A, Mammar S (2011) Piecewise affine state feedback controller for lane departure avoidance. In: Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp 839–844

  10. Kaempchen N, Schiele B, Dietmayer K (2009) Situation assessment of an autonomous emergency brake for arbitrary vehicle-to-vehicle collision scenarios. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 10(4):678–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murray R (2007) Driverless cars. Control Autom 18(3):14–17

    Google Scholar 

  12. Urmson C, Whittaker W (2008) Self-driving cars and the urban challenge. IEEE Intell Syst 23(2):66–68

  13. Gong J, Yuan S, Yan J, Chen X, Di H (2014) Intuitive decision-making modeling for self-driving vehicles. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2014 IEEE 17th International Conference on, pp 29–34

  14. Koo K-M, Jiang X, Kikuchi K, Konno A, Uchiyama M (2008) Development of a robot car wiring system. In: Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, 2008. AIM 2008. IEEE/ASME International Conference on, pp 862–867

  15. Levinson J, Askeland J, Becker J, Dolson J, Held D, Kammel S, Kolter JZ, Langer D, Pink O, Pratt V, Sokolsky M, Stanek G, Stavens DM, Teichman A, Werling M, Thrun S (2011) Towards fully autonomous driving: systems and algorithms. In: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp 163–168

  16. Leonard J, How J, Teller S, Berger M, Campbell S, Fiore G, Fletcher L, Frazzoli E, Huang AS, Karaman S, Koch O, Kuwata Y, Moore D, Olson E, Peters S, Teo J, Truax R, Walter M, Barrett D, Epstein A, Maheloni K, Moyer K, Jones T, Buckley R, Antone M, Galejs R, Krishnamurthy S, Williams J (2008) A perception driven autonomous urban robot. Int J Field Robot 25(10):727–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thorpe C, Aufrere R, Carlson J, Duggins D, Fong T, Gowdy J, Kozar J, MacLachlan R, McCabe C, Mertz C, Suppe A, Wang C-C, Yata T (2002) Safe robot driving. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Automation (ICMA 2002)

  18. Urmson C, Baker C, Dolan J, Rybski P, Salesky B, Whittaker WRL, Ferguson D, Darms M (2009) Autonomous driving in traffic: boss and the urban challenge. AI Mag 30(1):17–29

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang X, Kompfner P, White C, Sexton B (1998) Guidebook for assessment of transport telematics applications: updated version. In: Deliverable 2.3.1 of the CONVERGE Project

  20. Consortium A (2007) Feasibility study for the setting-up of a performance testing programme for ICT-based safety systems for road transport. In: Study Result

  21. Lesemann M, Lutzow J, Zlocki A (2010) evalue—a test program for active safety systems. In: ITS World Congress

  22. Lemmen P, Fagerlind H, Unselt T, Rodarius C, Infantes E, van der Zweep C (2012) Assessment of integrated vehicle safety systems for improved vehicle safety. In: Transport Research Arena—Europe 2012

  23. Kanthalakshmi S, Manikandan V (2011) Fault tolerant control using proportional-integral-derivative controller tuned by genetic algorithm. J Comput Sci 7(8):1187–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McCall J, Trivedi M (2006) Video-based lane estimation and tracking for driver assistance: survey, system, and evaluation. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 7(1):20–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Oliveira L, Nunes U (2010) Context-aware pedestrian detection using lidar. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp 773–778

  27. Belbachir A, Smal J-C, Blosseville J-M, Gruyer D (2012) Simulation-driven validation of advanced driving-assistance systems. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 48:1205–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Belbachir A, Smal J-C, Blosseville J-M (2012) A robotic platform to evalute autonomous driving systems. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on, pp 1874–1879

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the two teams: ESIGELEC-IRSEEM (Institut de Recherche en Systèmes Electroniques Embarqués, Rouen, France) and IFSTTAR-LEMCO (Laboratoire de Mesure de la Mobilité Coopérative, Versailles, France). The author would like to thank Önder Gürcan for his remarks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IPSA (Institut Polytechnique des Sciences Avancées), Ivry-sur-Seine, France

    Assia Belbachir

Authors
  1. Assia Belbachir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Assia Belbachir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Belbachir, A. An embedded testbed architecture to evaluate autonomous car driving. Intel Serv Robotics 10, 109–119 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-016-0213-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-016-0213-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation