Synergistic use of an oil drift model and remote sensing observations for oil spill monitoring | Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Synergistic use of an oil drift model and remote sensing observations for oil spill monitoring

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In case of oil spills due to disasters, one of the environmental concerns is the oil trajectories and spatial distribution. To meet these new challenges, spill response plans need to be upgraded. An important component of such a plan would be models able to simulate the behaviour of oil in terms of trajectories and spatial distribution, if accidentally released, in deep water. All these models need to be calibrated with independent observations. The aim of the present paper is to demonstrate that significant support to oil slick monitoring can be obtained by the synergistic use of oil drift models and remote sensing observations. Based on transport properties and weathering processes, oil drift models can indeed predict the fate of spilled oil under the action of water current velocity and wind in terms of oil position, concentration and thickness distribution. The oil spill event that occurred on 31 May 2003 in the Baltic Sea offshore the Swedish and Danish coasts is considered a case study with the aim of producing three-dimensional models of sea circulation and oil contaminant transport. The High-Resolution Limited Area Model (HIRLAM) is used for atmospheric forcing. The results of the numerical modelling of current speed and water surface elevation data are validated by measurements carried out in Kalmarsund, Simrishamn and Kungsholmsfort stations over a period of 18 days and 17 h. The oil spill model uses the current field obtained from a circulation model. Near-infrared (NIR) satellite images were compared with numerical simulations. The simulation was able to predict both the oil spill trajectories of the observed slick and thickness distribution. Therefore, this work shows how oil drift modelling and remotely sensed data can provide the right synergy to reproduce the timing and transport of the oil and to get reliable estimates of thicknesses of spilled oil to prepare an emergency plan and to assess the magnitude of risk involved in case of oil spills due to disaster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Adamo M, De Carolis G, De Pasquale V, Pasquariello G (2005) Combined use of SAR and MODIS imagery to detect marine oil spills, SAR image analysis, modeling, and techniques VII, edited by F. Posa. Proc SPIE 5980:153–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamo M, De Carolis G, De Pasquale V, Pasquariello G (2009) Detection and tracking of oil slicks on sun-glittered visible and near infrared satellite imagery. Int J Remote Sens 30(24):6403–6427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rabeh AH (1994) Estimating surface oil spill transport due to wind in the Arabian Gulf. Ocean Eng 21(5):461–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (1996) State-of-the-art review of modeling transport and fate of oil spills. J Hydraulic Eng 594–609

  • Audunson T (1980) The fate and weathering of surface oil from the Bravo blowout. Mar Environ Res 3(1):35–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocard C, Castaing G and Gatellier C (1984). Chemical oil dispersion in trials at sea and in laboratory tests: the key role of dilution processes. In oil spill chemical dispersants: research, experience, and recommendations, edited by T. E. Allen, STP 840, 125–42. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM. 400

  • Brekke C, Solberg AH (2005) Oil spill detection by satellite remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 95:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen BM (2003) 3D oil drift and fate forecasts at DMI. Technical report. Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen

  • Chust G, Sagarminaga Y (2007) The multi-angle view of MISR detects oil slicks under sun glitter conditions. Remote Sens Environ 107(1/2):232–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark RN, Swayze GA, Leifer I (2010) A method for quantitative mapping of thick oil spills using imaging spectroscopy. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report Number 2010–1167

  • Coppini G, De Dominicis M, Zodiatis G, Lardner R, Pinardi N, Santoleri R, Colella S, Bignami F, Hayes DR, Soloviev D, s, Kallos G (2010) Hindcast of oil-spill pollution during the Lebanon crisis in the eastern Mediterranean, July–August 2006. Mar Pollut Bull. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.08.021

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox C, Munk W (1954) The measurement of the roughness of the sea surface from photographs of the sun’s glitter. J Opt Soc Am 44:838–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Carolis G, Adamo M, Pasquariello G, De Padova D, Mossa M (2013) Quantitative characterization of marine oil slick by satellite near-infrared imagery and oil drift modelling: the Fun Shai Hai case study. Int J Remote Sens 34:1838–1854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Carolis G, Adamo M, Pasquariello G (2014) On the estimation of thickness of marine oil slicks from sun-glittered, near-infrared MERIS and MODIS imagery: the Lebanon oil spill case study. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(1):559–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DHI Water & Environment (2008), MIKE 21 & MIKE 3 PA/SA—particle analysis and oil spill analysis module, user guide

  • DHI (2016) Mike 3 flow model: hydrodynamic module—scientific documentation, DHI Software 2016, Hørsholm, Denmark

  • Elhakeem A, Elshorbagy W, Chebbi R (2007) Oil spill simulation and validation in the Arabian Gulf with special reference to the UAE coast. J. Water, Air, Soil Poll 184:243–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elshorbagy W, Elhakeem A (2008) Risk assessment maps of oil spill for major desalination plants in the United Arab Emirates. Desalination 228:200–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl M, Minchella A, Marinkovic P, Veci L and Lu J (2012): An ESA open source toolbox for scientific exploitation of sar data. In Proceedings of 2012 I.E. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Munich, Germany. 5322–5324

  • Fingas M, Brown C (2014) Review of oil spill remote sensing. Mar Pollut Bull 83(1):9–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner C W (1985) Handbook of stochastic methods for physics chemistry and natural science, 13 of Springer Series in Synergetics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition

  • HIRLAM-5 Scientific Documentation (2012) HIRLAM-5 Project, c/o Per Undén SMHI, S-601 76 Norrkoping, SWEDEN

  • Hoge FE, Swift RN (1980) Oil film thickness measurement using airborne induced water Raman backscatter. Appl Opt 15:409–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger JP, Mennella RA (1973) Oil spills: measurements of their distributions and volumes by multifrequency microwave radiometry. Science 181:54–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu C, Li XF, Pichel WG, Muller-Karger FE (2009) Detection of natural oil slicks in the NW Gulf of Mexico using MODIS imagery. Geophys Res Lett 36:L01604. doi:10.1029/2008GL036119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov AY (2010) The oil spill from a shipwreck in Kerch Strait: radar monitoring and numerical modelling. Int J Remote Sens 31:17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankara RS and Subramanian BR (2007) Oil spill sensitivity analysis and risk assessment for gulf of Kachchh, India, using integrated. modeling J Coast Res 23, 5, 1251–1258

  • Kloeden PE, Platen E (1999) Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations, vol. 23. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostianoy AG, Bulycheva EV (2014) Numerical simulation of risks of oil pollution in the Southeastern Baltic Sea and in the Gulf of Finland. Modern problems of remote sensing of the Earth from space, V11, N 4, 56–75

  • Leifer I, Clark R, Jones C, Holt B, Svejkovsky J, Swayse G (2011) Satellite and airborne oil spill remote sensing: state of the art and application to the BP deepwater horizon oil spill. AMOP 270–295

  • Leifer I, Lehr WJ, Simecek-Beatty D (2012) State of the art satellite and airborne marine oil spill remote sensing: application to the BP deepwater horizon oil spill. Remote Sens of Environ 124:185–209. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.03.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennon M, Babichenko S, Thomas N (2006) Detection and mapping of oil slicks in the sea by combined use of hyperspectral imagery and laser-induced fluorescence. European Association of Remote Sensing Laboratories eProc 5:120–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Lončar G., Beg Paklar G., Janekovic I. (2012a) Numerical modelling of oil spills in the area of Kvarner and Rijeka Bay (The Northern Adriatic Sea. Journal of Applied Mathematics 2012, 497936, doi:10.1155/2012/497936

  • Lončar G, Leder N, Paladin M (2012b) Numerical modelling of an oil spill in the northern Adriatic. Oceanologia 54(2):143–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu YC, Tian QJ, Wan JJ, Wang XC, Qi XP (2008) Experimental study on spectral responses of offshore oil slick. Chin Sci Bull 53:3937–3941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Li X, Tian Q, Han W (2012) An optical remote sensing model for estimating oil slick thickness based on two-beam interference theory. Opt Exp 20(22):24496–24504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Tian Q, Wang X, Zheng G, Li X (2013) Determining oil slick thickness using hyperspectral remote sensing in the Bohai Sea of China. Int. J. Digital. Earth 6(1):76–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogensen N, Nielsen LG, Rekvad T (2003) Collision between Chinese bulk carrier Fu Shan Hai and Cypriot container vessel Gdynia. Casualty report, Copenhagen: Danish: Maritime Authority 33

  • Mossa M (2006) Field measurements and monitoring of wastewater discharge in sea water. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 68:509–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossa M (2010) Scraping the bottom of the barrel: what are the risks?”, Editorial of Hydrolink, n. 3, 2010, supplement to Journal of Hydraulic Research 48

  • Reed M, Turner A, Odulo T, Isaji S, Sortrom S. and Mathisen JO (1990) Field evaluation of satellite-tracked surface drifting buoys in simulating the movement of spilled oil in the marine environment. U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, MMS 90–0050

  • Reed M, Turned C, Odulo A (1994) The role of wind and emulsification in modelling oil spill and surface drifter trajectories. Spill Science Technology Bulletin 1:143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed M, Johansen O, Brandvik PJ, Daling P, Lewis A, Fiocco R, Mackay D, Prentki R (1999) Oil spill modeling towards the close of the 20th century: overview of the state of the art. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin 5:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodi W (1987) Examples of calculation methods for flow and mixing in stratified fluids. J Geophys Res 92:5305–5328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinsky J (1993) Some historical remarks on the use of nonlinear viscosities. In: Galperin B, Orszag S (eds) Large eddy simulation of complex engineering and geophysical flows. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 3–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaulding M (1988) A state-of-the-art review of oil spill trajectory and fate modeling. Oil and Chemical Pollution 4:39–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spaulding M, Kolluru V, Anderson E, Howlett E (1994) Application of three-dimensional oil spill model (WOSM/OILMAP) to hindcast the Braer spill. Spill Sci Technol Bull 1:23–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens MA (1970) Use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramér-Von Mises and related statistics without extensive tables. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological) 32(1):115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolzenbach KD, Madsen EE, Adams A, Pollack A, Cooper C (1977) A review and evaluation of basic technique for predicting the behavior of surface oil slicks. Report no. 22. Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Svejkovsky J (2009) Development of a portable multispectral aerial sensor for real-time oil spill thickness mapping in coastal and offshore waters. Final report, Contract No.M07PC13205. Herndon, VA: U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service

  • Sykas D, Karathanassi V, Andreou Ch, Kolokoussis P (2011). Oil spill thickness estimation using unmixing methods. 3rd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing. IEEE

  • Vethamony P, Sudheesh K, Babu MT, Jayakumar S, Manimurali R, Saran AK (2007) Trajectory of an oil spill off Goa, eastern Arabian Sea: field observations and simulations. Environ Pollut 148:438–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verma P, Wate SR, Devotta S (2008) Simulation of impact of oil spill in the ocean—a case study of Arabian Gulf. Environ Monit Assess 146:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettle M, Daniel PJ, Logan GA, Thankappan M (2009) Assessing the effect of hydrocarbon type and thickness on a remote sensing signal: a sensitivity study based on the optical properties of two different oil types and the HYMAP and quickbird sensors. Remote Sens Environ 113(9):2000–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmott CJ (1981) On the validation of models. Phys Geogr 2:184–194

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil, Environmental, Building Engineering and Chemistry, Technical University of Bari, via Orabona 4, 70125, Bari, Italy

    Diana De Padova & Michele Mossa

  2. National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Intelligent Systems for Automation (CNR–ISSIA), via Amendola 122/D, 70126, Bari, Italy

    Maria Adamo & Guido Pasquariello

  3. National Research Council of Italy, Institute for the Electromagnetic Remote Sensing of the Environment (CNR-IREA), via Bassini 15, 20133, Milan, Italy

    Giacomo De Carolis

Authors
  1. Diana De Padova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michele Mossa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Adamo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giacomo De Carolis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guido Pasquariello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana De Padova.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Marcus Schulz

Capsule abstract

The aim of the present paper is to demonstrate that significant support to oil slick monitoring can be obtained by the synergistic use of oil drift models and remote sensing observations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Padova, D., Mossa, M., Adamo, M. et al. Synergistic use of an oil drift model and remote sensing observations for oil spill monitoring. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 5530–5543 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8214-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8214-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation