Media Independent Handover and Mobile IPv6-Based UDP Performance Evaluation Suite for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks | Wireless Personal Communications Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Media Independent Handover and Mobile IPv6-Based UDP Performance Evaluation Suite for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simulation is a cost-effective, simple, and straightforward approach to implementing a system for exhaustive analysis. Many commercial and open-source simulators, such as NS2, NS3, OMNET++, OPNET, QualNet, etc., exist in the literature to simulate wired and wireless networks. However, the major challenge in dealing with open-source simulators is analysing the results and presenting their performance metrics. Further, the ever-increasing demands of the users in terms of higher data rates with uninterrupted connections resulted in a heterogeneous wireless network (HWN) that supports the integration of WiFi, WiMAX, LTE, etc. Amongst all network simulators available in the literature, NS2 and NS3 are the most popularly used by the research community because of their immense support for implementing and verifying innovative networking algorithms. Furthermore, with the contribution of the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST), NS2 supports the simulation of WiFi and WiMAX heterogeneous wireless networks with Media Independent Handover and Mobile-IPv6 which is yet to be supported entirely by NS3. However, the major shortcoming of NIST’s contribution is the ease of developing a simulation script followed by result analysis. In continuation with the NIST’s contribution, this paper proposes a Graphical User Interface-based evaluation suite (ES) for the simulation of User Datagram Protocol applications’ in HWN, referred to as ES-HWN. With the support of this suite, the research community can quickly develop the heterogeneous wireless network simulation script followed by the textual and graphical results of handover, packets sent and received, throughput, packet delay, and jitter. The proposed ES-HWN supports the configuration of 10 WiFi and WiMAX interface mobile nodes with two WiFi-Access Points and a WiMAX-Base Station. Besides, it supports the configuration of UDP-based applications’ packet size and transmission rate. Finally, over many experiments, ES-HWN exhibited 100% reliable results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing does not apply to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Notes

  1. Network Simulator—NS2. Available: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.

  2. Network Simulator—NS3. Available: https://www.nsnam.org/.

  3. OMNet++. Available: http://www.omnetpp.org/.

  4. OPNET. Available: https://opnetprojects.com/opnet-network-simulator/.

  5. QualNet. Available: http://www.scalable-networks.com/products/.

  6. J-Sim. Available: https://www.kiv.zcu.cz/j-sim/.

  7. NIST. Available: http://www.nist.gov/ctl/wireless-networks.

  8. RFC 6275-Mobility Support in IPv6. Available: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6275.txt.

  9. AWK. Available: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/awk.html.

  10. Gnuplot. Available: http://www.gnuplot.info/.

References

  1. Imran, M., Said, A. M., & Hasbullah, H. (2010). A survey of simulators. Emulators and testbeds for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of international symposium in information technology (Vol. 2, pp. 897–902).

  2. Jain, R. (1991). Art of computer systems performance analysis techniques for experimental design measurements simulation and modeling (1st ed.). Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernandez, M. P., Wahle, S., Magedanz, T. (2012). A new approach to ngn evaluation integrating simulation and testbed methodology. In Proceedings of international conference on networks (ICN-2012) (pp. 22–27).

  4. Rahman, M. A., Pakštas, A., & Wang, F. Z. (2009). Network modelling and simulation tools. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 17, 1011–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heidemann, J., Mills, K., & Kumar, S. (2001). Expanding confidence in network simulations. IEEE Network, 15, 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Issariyakul, T., & Hossain, E. (2011). Introduction to network simulator NS2 (1st ed.). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sobeih, A., Chen, W.-P., Hou, J., Kung, L.-C., Li, N., Lim, H., Tyan, H.-Y., & Zhang, H. (2005). J-sim: A simulation environment for wireless sensor networks. In 38th Annual simulation symposium (pp. 175–187). https://doi.org/10.1109/ANSS.2005.27

  8. Weingartner, E., vom Lehn, H., Wehrle, K. (2009). A performance comparison of recent network simulators. In Proceedings of international conference on communications (ICC-2009) (pp. 1–5).

  9. Marques, H., Ribeiro, J., Marques, P., & Rodriguez, J. (2010). Simulation of 802.21 Handovers Using ns-2. Journal of Computer Systems, Networks, and Communications, 2010, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan, A. R., Bilal, S. M., Othman, M. (2012). A performance comparison of network simulators for wireless networks. In Proceedings of international conference on control system, computing and engineering (ICCSCE-2012) (pp. 34–38).

  11. Monika, A. K., & Shekhar, M. (2014). Network simulators for next generation networks: An overview. International Journal of Mobile Network Communications and Telematics (IJMNCT), 4, 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghaffarian, H., & Sadeghizadeh, M. (2022). Parsim: A parametric simulation application for wireless sensor networks based on ns2 simulator. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications.

  13. Toor, A. S., & Jain, A. (2017). A survey on wireless network simulators. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 6(1), 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Begg, L., Liu, W., Pawlikowski, S., Perera, S., & Sirisena, H. (2006). Survey of simulators of next generation networks for studying service availability and resilience, technical report. CSE Department: University of Canterbury.

  15. Orfanus, D., Lessmann, J., Janacik, P., & Lachev, L. (2008). Performance of wireless network simulators—A case study. In Proceedings of the 3nd ACM workshop on performance monitoring and measurement of heterogeneous wireless and wired networks (PM2HW2N’08) (pp. 59–66).

  16. Rouil, R. (2007). The network simulator ns-2 nist add-on; ieee 802.16 model (mac+phy), National Institute of Standards and Technology .

  17. Lampropoulos, G., Salkintzis, A. K., & Passas, N. (2008). Media-independent handover for seamless service provision in heterogeneous networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 46, 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eastwood, L., Migaldi, S., Xie, Q., & Gupta, V. (2008). Mobility using IEEE 802.21 in a heterogeneous IEEE 802.16/802.11-based IMT-advanced (4G) network. IEEE Wireless Communications, 15, 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oliva, A. D. L., Banchs, A., Soto, I., Malia, T., & Vidal, A. (2008). An overview of IEEE 802.21: Media independent handover. IEEE Wireless Communications, 15, 96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Golmie, N. T., et al. (2005). Seamless and secure mobility. In 9th DOD annual information assurance workshop in Philadelphia (pp. 7–10).

  21. Robbins, A. (2010). Effective awk programming, 3rd edn. O’Reilly Media

  22. Fratu, O., Popovici, E. C., Vulpe, A., & Halunga, S. V. (2011). Heterogeneous wireless access networks analysis from simulation to implementation. In: Proceedings of international conference on telecommunication in modern satellite cable and broadcasting services (Vol. 2, pp. 481–488).

  23. Marquez-Barja, J., Calafate, C. T., Cano, J.-C., & Manzoni, P. (2011). An overview of vertical handover techniques: Algorithms, protocols and tools. Computer Communications, 34, 985–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rumekasten, M. (1994). Simulation of heterogeneous networks. In Proceedings of international conference on networking (pp. 1264–1271).

  25. Perron, L. F., Cicconetti, & C., Ward, B. C. (2009). On the automation of computer network simulators. In Proceedings of international conference on simulation tools and techniques (SIMUTools) (pp. 1–10).

  26. Sawashima, H., Hori, Y., & Sunahara, H. (1997). Characteristics of UDP packet loss: Effect of TCP traffic. In Proceedings of INET’97.

  27. Piamrat, K., Ksentini, A., Bonnin, J.-M., & Viho, C. (2011). Radio resource management in emerging heterogeneous wireless networks. Computer Communications, 34(9), 1066–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Márquez-Barja, J., Calafate, C. T., Cano, J.-C., & Manzoni, P. (2011). An overview of vertical handover techniques: Algorithms, protocols and tools. Computer Communications, 34(8), 985–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahmed, A., Boulahia, L. M., & Gaiti, D. (2014). Enabling vertical handover decisions in heterogeneous wireless networks: A state-of-the-art and a classification. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 16(2), 776–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Antonopoulos, A., Alonso-Zárate, J., Kartsakli, E., Alonso, L., & Verikoukis, C. (2013). Cross layer access point selection mechanisms for a distributed queuing MAC protocol. Telecommunication Systems, 53(3), 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Siddiqui, F., & Zeadally, S. (2006). Mobility management across hybrid wireless networks: Trends and challenges. Computer Communications, 29(9), 1363–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rahate, G., & Chopade, N. (2022). Realistic vertical handoff predictive trigger thresholding in heterogeneous networks. Ingénierie des Systèmes d’Information 27(4).

  33. Hajar, M. S., Khaled Chahine, M., Hamdan, R., & Qdah, M. S. (2021). Performance analysis of vertical handover using predictable lgd event based on ieee 802.21. In 2021 IEEE international conference on communications workshops (ICC workshops) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCWorkshops50388.2021.9473639

  34. De La Oliva, A., Banchs, A., Soto, I., Melia, T., & Vidal, A. (2008). An overview of iEEE 802.21: Media-independent handover services. IEEE Wireless Communications, 15(4), 96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Radhakrishnan, R., Jamil, M., & Mehfuz, S. (2008). A robust return routability procedure for mobile ipv6. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 8, 234–240.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Williams, T., & Kelley, C. (2011). gnuplot 44: An interactive plotting program. O’Reilly Media.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, G. (2007). An NS2 TCP evaluation tool, internet-draft draft-irtf-tmrg-ns2-tcp-tool-00, internet engineering task force, work in progress. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-tmrg-ns2-tcp-tool/00/

  38. Bouras, C., Charalambides, S., Drakoulelis, M., Kioumourtzis, G., & Stamos, K. (2013). A tool for automating network simulation and processing tracing data files. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 30, 90–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ibrahim, I. S., King, P. J., & Loidl, H.-W. (2015). Nsgtfa: A gui tool to easily measure network performance through the ns2 trace file. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 24(4), 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ibrahim, I. S., King, P. J., & Loidl1, H.-W. (2015). NsGTFA: A GUI tool to easily measure network performance through the Ns2 trace file. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 24, 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Neves, P., Soares, J., & Sargento, S. (2009). Media independent handovers: Lan, man and wan scenarios. In IEEE globecom workshops, (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOMW.2009.5360720

  42. Chen, Y.-C., Hsia, J.-H., & Liao, Y.-J. (2009). Advanced seamless vertical handoff architecture for WiMAX and WiFi heterogeneous networks with QoS guarantees. Computer Communications, 32, 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pontes, A. B., Silva, D. D. P., Jailton, J., Rodrigues, O., & Dias, K. L. (2008). Hanover management in integrated WLAN and mobile WIMAX networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 15, 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shi, F., Li, K., & Shen, Y. (2010). Seamless handoff scheme in Wi-Fi and WiMAX heterogeneous networks. Future Generation Computer Systems, 26, 1404–1408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Coqueiro, T., Jailton, J., Carvalho, T., & Francês, R. (2019). A fuzzy logic system for vertical handover and maximizing battery lifetime in heterogeneous wireless multimedia networks. In Wireless communications and mobile computing 2019.

  46. Edward, E. P. (2019). An IMS-based advanced handoff scheme for Wi-Fi/LTE integrated framework. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series B, 100(3), 201–206.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Bisio, I., & Sciarrone, A. (2019). Fast multiattribute network selection technique for vertical handover in heterogeneous emergency communication systems. In Wireless communications and mobile computing 2019.

  48. Lampropoulos, G., Skianis, C., & Neves, P. (2010). Optimized fusion of heterogeneous wireless networks based on media-independent handover operations. IEEE Wireless Communications, 17, 78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Andreadis, A., Rizzuto, S., & Zambon, R. (2012). A WiMAX simulation module for investigating QoS during horizontal handovers. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 29, 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Mangalore, India

    B. R. Chandavarkar

Authors
  1. B. R. Chandavarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Material preparation and analysis were performed by me only.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. R. Chandavarkar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I have no conflicts of interest to disclose. No financial conflicts with any author or agencies.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable

Code Availability

Code sharing does not apply to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chandavarkar, B.R. Media Independent Handover and Mobile IPv6-Based UDP Performance Evaluation Suite for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 129, 1197–1228 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10184-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10184-y

Keywords