Integration of Prediction Based Hybrid Compression in Distributed Sensor Network | Wireless Personal Communications Skip to main content
Log in

Integration of Prediction Based Hybrid Compression in Distributed Sensor Network

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a hybrid data compression scheme based on predictive compressed sensing (CS) and light weight lossless compression is suggested for wireless sensor networks (WSNs). CS based techniques are well motivated in WSNs not only for sparse signals but also by the requirement of efficient in-network processing in terms of transmit power and communication bandwidth even with nonsparse signals. This algorithm exploits prediction-based approach in which the difference between the actual measurements and the predicted measurements of the dataset is encoded using CS technique with reasonable error. The CS encoded data is further compressed using Huffman encoding to improve the compression ratio without any loss in quality. We analyzed the performance, data rate saving and inaccuracy introduced by the hybrid compression algorithm. The post processing analysis shows high compression ratios, with acceptable mean squared error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. David, L. (2009). Donoho, “Compressed sensing.” IEEE Transactions On Information Theory, 52, 1289–1306.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Machiwal D., & Jha, M. K. (2012) Stochastic modelling of time series. In: Hydrologic time series analysis: Theory and Practice. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1861-6_5

  3. Tealab, A. (2018). Time series forecasting using artificial neural networks methodologies: A systematic review. Future Computing and Informatics Journal, 3(2), 334–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yadav, S., & Kumar, V. (2019). Hybrid compressive sensing enabled energy efficient transmission of multi-hop clustered UWSNs. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 110, 152836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Srisooksai, T., Keamarungsi, K., Lamsrichan, P., & Araki, K. (2012). Practical data compression in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, ELSEVIER, 35, 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo, H., Tong, Y. C., & Pottie, G. (2005). A two-stage DPCM scheme for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings. (ICASSP’05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 3, 661–664.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Medeiros, H. P., Maciel, M. C., Demo Souza, R., & Pellenz, M. E. (2014). Lightweight data compression in wireless sensor networks using Huffman coding. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 10(1), 672921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marcelloni, F. (2008). Massimo Vecchio, A simple algorithm for data compression in wireless sensor networks”. IEEE Communications Letters, 12, 411–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kolo, J. G., Shanmugam, S. A., Lim, D. W. G., Ang, L. M., & Seng, K. P. (2012). An adaptive lossless data compression scheme for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Sensors, 2012(2012), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/539638

  10. Parnasree Chakraborty, C. (2015). Tharini, “analysis of suitable modulation scheme for compressive sensing algorithm in wireless sensor network”, sensor review (ISSN: 0260–2288). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 35(2), 168–173.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chakraborty, P., & Prasad, T. (2018). ”An efficient communication protocol for wireless sensor network using differential encoding based compressed sensing technique”, international journal of circuits, systems and signal processing ( ISSN: 1998–4464). NAUN publication, 12, 356–366.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Climate Data Online: Dataset Discovery. Available: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datasets. Accessed 20 Aug 2021.

  13. Why small L1 norm means sparsity? (2016). Available: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1904767/why-small-l1-norm-means-sparsity. Accessed 20 Aug 2021.

  14. How to define sparseness of a vector? (2017). Available: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/117860/how-to-define-sparseness-of-a-vector. Accessed 20 Aug 2021.

  15. Masoum, A., Meratnia, N., & Havinga, P. J. (2013). A distributed compressive sensing technique for data gathering in wireless sensor networks. Procedia Computer Science, 21, 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karakus, C. (2013). Ali Cafer Gurbuz, Bulent Tavli, “analysis of energy efficiency of compressive sensing in wireless sensor networks.” IEEE Sensors Journal, 13, 1999–2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chakraborty, P., & Chandrapragasam, T. (2021). Extended applications of compressed sensing algorithm in biomedical signal and image compression. Journal of the Institution of the Engineers India Series B. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40031-021-00592-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gurve, D., Delisle-Rodriguez, D., Bastos-Filho, T., & Krishnan, S. (2020). (2020) Trends in Compressive Sensing for EEG Signal Processing Applications. Sensors (Basel), 20(13), 3703. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar, P., & Parmar, A. (2020). Versatile approaches for medical image compression: A review. Procedia Computer Science, 167, 1380–1389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.349.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank their supporting educational institution for providing infrastructure facilities and licensed software to carry out the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parnasree Chakraborty.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakraborty, P., Tharini, C. Integration of Prediction Based Hybrid Compression in Distributed Sensor Network. Wireless Pers Commun 122, 229–241 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08896-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08896-0

Keywords

Navigation