Wavelet Based De-noising Using Logarithmic Shrinkage Function | Wireless Personal Communications Skip to main content
Log in

Wavelet Based De-noising Using Logarithmic Shrinkage Function

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Noise in signals and images can be removed through different de-noising techniques such as mean filtering, median filtering, total variation and filtered variation techniques etc. Wavelet based de-noising is one of the major techniques used for noise removal. In the first part of our work, wavelet transform based logarithmic shrinkage technique is used for de-noising of images, corrupted by noise (during under-sampling in the frequency domain). The logarithmic shrinkage technique is applied to under-sampled Shepp–Logan Phantom image. Experimental results show that the logarithmic shrinkage technique is 7–10% better in PSNR values than the existing classical techniques. In the second part of our work we de-noise the noisy, under-sampled phantom image, having salt and pepper, Gaussian, speckle and Poisson noises through the four thresholding techniques and compute their correlations with the original image. They give the correlation values close to the noisy image. By applying median or wiener filter in parallel with the thresholding techniques, we get 30–35% better results than only applying the thresholding techniques individually. So, in the second part we recover and de-noise the sparse under-sampled images by the combination of shrinkage functions and median filtering or wiener filtering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta, G., & Chandel, R. (2013). Image filtering algorithms and techniques: A review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 3(10), 198–202.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Donoho, D. L., & Arias-Castro, E. (2009). Does median filtering truly preserve edges better than linear filtering? The Annals of Statistics, 37(3), 1172–1206.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Pesquet, J. C., & Combettes, P. L. (2004). Image restoration subject to a total variation constraint. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(9), 1213–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kose, K., Cevher, V., & Cetin, A. E. (2012). Filtered variation method for denoising and sparse signal processing. In IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), Kyoto.

  5. Liu, X., Li, C.-C., Sclabassi, R. J., Sun, M., & Zhao, R. (2009). Wavelet denoising via sparse representation. Science in China Series F: Information Sciences, 52(8), 1371–1377.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhonsle, B., & Dewangan, N. (2013). Comparison of wavelet thresholding for image denoising using different shrinkage. International Journal of Emerging Trends and Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS), 2(1), 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhong, S., & Mallat, S. (1992). characterization of signals from multiscale edges. IEEE Transactions on Patiern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(7), 710–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, Y., Weaver, J. B., Healy, D. M., & Lu, J. (1994). Wavelet transform domain filters: A spatially selective noise filtration technique. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 3(6), 747–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Azzawi, A. G. (2012). Image denoising based using hybrid techniques mixed between (hard and soft threshold) with multiwavelet transform and multi-stage vector quantization. Diyala Journal for Pure Sciences, 8(3), 45–67.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Coifman, D. D. R. R. (1995). Wavelets and statistics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Donoho, D. L. (1995). De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 41(3), 613–627.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao, H.-Y. (1998). Wavelet shrinkage denoising using the non-negative garrote. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7(4), 469–488.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Blumensath, T., & Davies, M. E. (2009). Iterative hard thresholding for compressed sensing. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 27(3), 265–274.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Prinosil, J., Smekal, Z., & Bartusek, K. (2010). Wavelet thresholding techniques in MRI domain. In International conference on biosciences. Brno: Czech Republic.

  15. Peter, S., Joy, N., & Joy, J. (2013). denoising using soft thresholding. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, 2(3), 1027–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khan, S. U., Qureshi, I. M., Haider, H., Zaman, F., & Shoaib, B. (2016). Diagnosis of faulty sensors in phased array radar using compressed sensing and hybrid IRLS–SSF algorithm. Wireless Personal Communications, 89(2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khan, S. U., Qureshi, I. M., Naveed, A., Shoaib, B., & Basit, A. (2016). Detection of defective sensors in phased array using compressed sensing and hybrid genetic algorithm. Journal of Sensors, 91, 383. doi:10.1155/2016/6139802.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Khan, S. U., & Rahim, M. K. A. (2017). Correction of failure in antenna array using matrix mencil technique. Chinese Physics B. doi:10.1088/1674-1056/26/6/068401.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khan, S. U., Rahim, M. K. A., Qureshi, I. M., & Murad, N. A. (2017). Detection of faulty sensors in linear arrays using hybrid differential evolution based compressed sensing technique. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 7(2), 961–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shafqat Ullah Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ullah, H., Amir, M., Ul Haq, I. et al. Wavelet Based De-noising Using Logarithmic Shrinkage Function. Wireless Pers Commun 98, 1473–1488 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4927-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4927-3

Keywords