Abstract
Noise in signals and images can be removed through different de-noising techniques such as mean filtering, median filtering, total variation and filtered variation techniques etc. Wavelet based de-noising is one of the major techniques used for noise removal. In the first part of our work, wavelet transform based logarithmic shrinkage technique is used for de-noising of images, corrupted by noise (during under-sampling in the frequency domain). The logarithmic shrinkage technique is applied to under-sampled Shepp–Logan Phantom image. Experimental results show that the logarithmic shrinkage technique is 7–10% better in PSNR values than the existing classical techniques. In the second part of our work we de-noise the noisy, under-sampled phantom image, having salt and pepper, Gaussian, speckle and Poisson noises through the four thresholding techniques and compute their correlations with the original image. They give the correlation values close to the noisy image. By applying median or wiener filter in parallel with the thresholding techniques, we get 30–35% better results than only applying the thresholding techniques individually. So, in the second part we recover and de-noise the sparse under-sampled images by the combination of shrinkage functions and median filtering or wiener filtering.







Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gupta, G., & Chandel, R. (2013). Image filtering algorithms and techniques: A review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 3(10), 198–202.
Donoho, D. L., & Arias-Castro, E. (2009). Does median filtering truly preserve edges better than linear filtering? The Annals of Statistics, 37(3), 1172–1206.
Pesquet, J. C., & Combettes, P. L. (2004). Image restoration subject to a total variation constraint. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(9), 1213–1222.
Kose, K., Cevher, V., & Cetin, A. E. (2012). Filtered variation method for denoising and sparse signal processing. In IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), Kyoto.
Liu, X., Li, C.-C., Sclabassi, R. J., Sun, M., & Zhao, R. (2009). Wavelet denoising via sparse representation. Science in China Series F: Information Sciences, 52(8), 1371–1377.
Bhonsle, B., & Dewangan, N. (2013). Comparison of wavelet thresholding for image denoising using different shrinkage. International Journal of Emerging Trends and Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS), 2(1), 57–61.
Zhong, S., & Mallat, S. (1992). characterization of signals from multiscale edges. IEEE Transactions on Patiern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(7), 710–732.
Xu, Y., Weaver, J. B., Healy, D. M., & Lu, J. (1994). Wavelet transform domain filters: A spatially selective noise filtration technique. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 3(6), 747–758.
Al-Azzawi, A. G. (2012). Image denoising based using hybrid techniques mixed between (hard and soft threshold) with multiwavelet transform and multi-stage vector quantization. Diyala Journal for Pure Sciences, 8(3), 45–67.
Coifman, D. D. R. R. (1995). Wavelets and statistics. New York: Springer.
Donoho, D. L. (1995). De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 41(3), 613–627.
Gao, H.-Y. (1998). Wavelet shrinkage denoising using the non-negative garrote. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7(4), 469–488.
Blumensath, T., & Davies, M. E. (2009). Iterative hard thresholding for compressed sensing. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 27(3), 265–274.
Prinosil, J., Smekal, Z., & Bartusek, K. (2010). Wavelet thresholding techniques in MRI domain. In International conference on biosciences. Brno: Czech Republic.
Peter, S., Joy, N., & Joy, J. (2013). denoising using soft thresholding. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, 2(3), 1027–1032.
Khan, S. U., Qureshi, I. M., Haider, H., Zaman, F., & Shoaib, B. (2016). Diagnosis of faulty sensors in phased array radar using compressed sensing and hybrid IRLS–SSF algorithm. Wireless Personal Communications, 89(2), 1–20.
Khan, S. U., Qureshi, I. M., Naveed, A., Shoaib, B., & Basit, A. (2016). Detection of defective sensors in phased array using compressed sensing and hybrid genetic algorithm. Journal of Sensors, 91, 383. doi:10.1155/2016/6139802.
Khan, S. U., & Rahim, M. K. A. (2017). Correction of failure in antenna array using matrix mencil technique. Chinese Physics B. doi:10.1088/1674-1056/26/6/068401.
Khan, S. U., Rahim, M. K. A., Qureshi, I. M., & Murad, N. A. (2017). Detection of faulty sensors in linear arrays using hybrid differential evolution based compressed sensing technique. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 7(2), 961–966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ullah, H., Amir, M., Ul Haq, I. et al. Wavelet Based De-noising Using Logarithmic Shrinkage Function. Wireless Pers Commun 98, 1473–1488 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4927-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4927-3