Abstract
Three competing schemes have been proposed for multimedia transport over broadband wireless channels: (a) traditional UDP (Postel, The User Datagram Protocol, 1980 [1]), (b) semi-cross-layer UDP-Lite (The Lightweight User Datagram Protocol, 2004 [2]), and (c) cross-layer header estimation (Khayam et al., IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 9(2):377–385, 2007 [3]; Khayam and Radha, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 6(11):3946–3954, 2007 [4]). In all these schemes, corrupted and lost packets are recovered using FEC at the application layer. In this paper, we analytically and experimentally compare the performances of these broadband wireless multimedia schemes. First, we derive lower bounds on the excepted FEC redundancy required by ideal cross-layer header estimation, UDP and UDP-Lite over an arbitrary-order Markov wireless channel. We show that under realistic wireless channel conditions, the cross-layer header estimation scheme always requires lesser redundancy than UDP and UDP-Lite. We then propose a practical minimum distance decoding (MDD) header estimation scheme, which is receiver-based, low complexity and highly accurate. Trace-driven multimedia experiments over wireless LANs demonstrate that MDD header estimation requires significantly lesser FEC redundancy and renders better video quality than existing schemes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Postel, J. (1980). The User Datagram Protocol. RFC 768, August 1980.
Larzon, L.-A., Degermark, M., Pink, S., Jonsson, L.-E., & Fairhurst, G. (2004). The Lightweight User Datagram Protocol (UDP-Lite). RFC 3828, July 2004.
Khayam S. A., Karande S., Ilyas M. U., Radha H. (2007) Header detection to improve multimedia quality over wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 9(2): 377–385
Khayam S. A., Radha H. (2007) Maximum-likelihood header estimation: A cross-layer methodology for wireless multimedia. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 6(11): 3946–3954
Masala, E., Bottero, M., & De Martin, J. C. (2005). MAC-level partial checksum for H.264 video transmission over 802.11 ad hoc wireless networks. In IEEE VTC, Stockholm, Sweden, May 2005, Vol. 5, pp. 2864–2868.
Servetti, A., & De Martin, J. C. (2005). Error tolerant MAC extension for speech communications over 802.11 WLANs. In IEEE VTC, Stockholm, Sweden, May 2005, Vol. 4, pp. 2330–2334.
Singh, A., Konrad, A., & Joseph, A. D. (2001). Performance evaluation of UDP-Lite for cellular video. In ACM NOSSDAV, New York, USA.
Zheng H., Boyce J. (2001) An improved UDP protocol for video transmission over Internet-to-wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 3(3): 356–365
Zorzi M., Rao R. R. (1997) On the statistics of block errors in bursty channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications 45(6): 660–667
Konrad A., Zhao B. Y., Joseph A. D., Ludwig R. (2003) A Markov-based channel model algorithm for wireless networks. ACM Wireless Networks 9: 189–199
Khayam S. A., Radha H., Aviyente S., Deller J. R. Jr. (2007) Markov and multifractal wavelet models for wireless MAC-to-MAC channels. Elsevier Performance Evaluation 64(4): 298–314
Willig A., Kubisch M., Hoene C., Wolisz A. (2002) Measurements of a wireless link in an industrial environment using and 802.11-compliant physical layer. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 49(6): 1265–1282
Blahut R. E. (1984) Theory and practice of error control codes. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts
Draft ITU-T Recommendation and Final Draft International Standard of Joint Video Specification (ITU-T Rec. H.264 | ISO/IEC 14496-10 AVC), Doc. JVT-G050, March 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khayam, S.A., Radha, H. Comparison of Conventional and Cross-Layer Multimedia Transport Schemes for Wireless Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 51, 535–548 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-009-9746-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-009-9746-8