Evaluation of the Potentials of the Business Case of Deploying Reconfigurable Segments in Wireless B3G Infrastructures | Wireless Personal Communications Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Evaluation of the Potentials of the Business Case of Deploying Reconfigurable Segments in Wireless B3G Infrastructures

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The B3G concept can be realized in two complementary ways. The first solution is the integration of the diverse radio access technologies into one composite radio environment. The alternative solution is provided by the concept of reconfigurable (adaptive) networks. Composite radio networks, sometimes also referred to as cooperative networks, jointly handle a difficult condition. Reconfigurable networks on the other hand, support B3G Systems by providing technologies that enable network elements and terminals to dynamically adapt to the environment requirements and conditions, in principle, by means of self-management. This paper provides proof on the business advantages of reconfigurable networks. In this context the paper performs an evaluation of the investment in both composite radio and reconfigurable networks, presenting a methodology that can be used for the financial assessment of such networks by applying investment appraisal techniques. Concrete results for both cases are presented and analyzed. The analysis clearly proves that reconfigurable networks can provide significant business benefits for network operators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Third (3rd) Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). (2008). Accessed June 18, 2008, from http://www.3gpp.org.

  2. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). (2008). 802 Standards. Accessed June 18, 2008, from http://www.ieee802.org.

  3. Wireless World Research Forum (WWRF). (2008). Accessed June 18, 2008, from http://www.wireless-world-research.org

  4. Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB). (2008). Accessed June 18, 2008, from http://www.dvb.org.

  5. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). (2008). Accessed June 18, 2008, from http://www.ietf.org.

  6. Demestichas P., Stavroulaki V., Papadopoulou L., Vasilakos A., Theologou M. (2003) Service configuration and traffic distribution in composite radio environments. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Journal 33(4): 69–81

    Google Scholar 

  7. FP6 Project, IST-2005-027714. (2008). “End-to-End Reconfigurability II—E2R II”. Accessed June 18, 2008, from http://www.e2r2.motlabs.com.

  8. Demestichas P., Vivier G., El-Khazen K., Theologou M. (2004) Evolution in wireless systems management concepts: from composite radio to reconfigurability. IEEE Communications Magazine 42(5): 90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Software Defined Radio Forum (SDRF). (2008). Accessed June 18, 2008, from http://www.sdrforum.org.

  10. Palicot J., Roland C. (2003) A new concept for wireless reconfigurable receivers. IEEE Communications Magazine 41(7): 124–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Walter, H. W. (2004). Software defined radio: Baseband technologies for 3G handsets and basestations. Wiley.

  12. Walter, H. W. (2002). Software defined radio: Enabling technologies. Wiley.

  13. Mitola, J. (2000). Software radio architecture. Wiley-Interscience.

  14. Bourse D., El-Khazen K., Lee A., Grandblaise D., Boscovic D. (2006) Business perspectives of end-to-end reconfigurability. IEEE Wireless Communications 13(3): 46–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peterson, P. P., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2002). Capital budgeting: Theory and practice. Wiley Finance.

  16. Vance, D. E. (2002). Financial analysis and decision making: Tools and techniques to solve financial problems and make effective business decisions. McGraw-Hill.

  17. Odellion Research. (2008). Net present value. Accessed June 18, 2008, from http://www.odellion.com/index.htm.

  18. Wikipedia Contributors (2008). Net present value. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Accessed June 18, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Net_present_value&oldid=22014918.

  19. Investopedia Contributors. (2008). Investopedia ULC. Accessed June 18, 2008, from http://www.investopedia.com.

  20. Verbrugge S., Colle D., Pickavet M., Demeester P., Pasqualini S., Iselt A. et al (2006) Methodology and input availability parameters for calculating OpEx and CapEx costs for realistic network scenarios. Journal of Optical Networks 5: 509–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wikipedia Contributors. (2008). Depreciation. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Accessed June 18, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Depreciation&oldid=21864013.

  22. Motorola Electronics S.P.A. (2003). Business case for deployment of the Credo technology. Deliverable 15. Project IST-2001-33093 Credo.

  23. Demestichas P., Dimitrakopoulos G., Strassner J., Bourse D. (2006) Introducing reconfigurability and cognitive networks concepts in the wireless world: Research achievements and challenges. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine 1(2): 32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsagkaris K., Dimitrakopoulos G., Saatsakis A., Demestichas P. (2006) Distributed radio access technology selection for adaptive networks in high-speed, B3G infrastructures. International Journal of Communication Systems 20(8): 969–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Manero, C., & Pujol, F. (2006). Economie de la 3G /Stratégies des opérateurs en Europe. IDATE, M53405-Edition 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece

    Y. Kritikou, V. Stavroulaki & P. Demestichas

  2. Motorola Labs, European Communications Research, Paris, France

    D. Bourse

  3. Motorola Inc., Corporate Technology, Schaumburg, USA

    A. Lee

  4. France Telecom, Paris, France

    J. M. Temerson

Authors
  1. Y. Kritikou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Stavroulaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Demestichas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. Bourse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. M. Temerson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Kritikou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kritikou, Y., Stavroulaki, V., Demestichas, P. et al. Evaluation of the Potentials of the Business Case of Deploying Reconfigurable Segments in Wireless B3G Infrastructures. Wireless Pers Commun 51, 257–282 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-008-9642-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-008-9642-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation