Abstract
Delay/disruption tolerant network (DTN) plays a promising role in prospected information infrastructures for future space activities, such as Interplanetary Internet (IPN) or Solar System Internet (SSI). Over such long-haul and intermittent links, DTN technique makes scientific data return end-to-end reliable by the typical custody transfer and store-and-forward mechanism. Due to lack of enough space spacecrafts deployed for DTN, now and in the near decades, there will be some intermediary nodes which would carry a large proportion of network traffic as DTN routers. Consequently, the behaviors and capabilities of managing bundles in the intermediary nodes would have impacts on the data transport over space DTN. Focusing on the storage dynamics of bundles, in this paper, we propose an analytical framework based on two-dimension Markov chain to evaluate the behaviors of bundles delivery in DTN intermediate nodes. Accordingly, a delay model and a transmission success probability model for bundles delivery over space DTN are developed separately, both dependent closely on the sojourn time in node storages. The evaluation results indicate that: (1) Dividing the source files into bigger bundles for transmission causes a longer storage-occupancy time on intermediary nodes; (2) bundle sizes have more explicit impacts on the storage-occupancy time at a node than segment sizes do; and (3) the transmission success probability of a bundle is more dependent on a DTN bundle size than on a LTP segment size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6cb3/c6cb36541fbe6cb231e886a10cb70b83aa52fc7f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03396/03396215951b44f0877c14cb3494559476be7fe3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/584bb/584bb67f900697f59f8346532944ef9e616ec035" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f48b/3f48b95f0aefd49fece8ec8faa3e4f1715719b62" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc2b2/cc2b20779ef09e11079ff4fe9dcd1ed2c0e61bbc" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60c05/60c052a20362d4c86f47e8c67956b6da17174bbe" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/634f9/634f90ea851c1c8e98deea600239276da7ba7c28" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4eb7c/4eb7cf7f0ecc6fd03a605f3ef5366aa16ef2baaf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2234b/2234b700a9211b413466075db0bb4579fde22f9e" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burleigh, S., Hooke, A., et al. (2003). Delay-tolerant networking: An approach to interplanetary internet. IEEE Communications Magazine, 41(6), 128–136.
Cerf, V., et al. (2007). Delay-tolerant networking architecture, RFC 4838. Task Force: Internet Engineering.
Tsaoussidis, V., Psaras, I., Samaras, C. V., Papastergiou G. Some comments on delay-tolerant networking for space communications (draft vision).
Scott, K., & Burleigh, S. (2007). Bundle protocol specification, RFC 5050. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5050.txt.
Sun, X., Yu, Q., Wang, R., Zhang, Q., Wei, Z., Hu, J., & Vasilakos, A. (2013). Performance of DTN protocols in space communications. ACM/Springer Wireless Networks, 19(4). http://www.springer.com/home?SGWID=0-0-1003-0-0&aqId=2479934&download=1&checkval=e677238f65f09003ad3edae76a86db03).
Samaras, C. V., & Tsaoussidis, V. (2011). Adjusting transport segmentation policy of DTN bundle protocol under synergy with lower layers. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(2), 226–237.
Bezirgiannidis, N., & Tsaoussidis, V. (2010). Packet size and DTN transport service: Evaluation on a DTN Testbed. 2010 International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT), pp. 1198–1205.
de Cola, T., & Marchese, M. (2010). Joint use of custody transfer and erasure codes in DTN space networks: Benefits and shortcomings. 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010), pp. 1–5.
Wang, R., Horan, S., & Chandrasekaran, R. (2006). An experimental investigation of cross-layer optimal packet size in space Internet. International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking, 24(6), 561–577.
Mahendran, V., & Praveen, T., et al. (2012). Buffer dimensioning of delay-tolerant network nodes: A large deviations approach. Distributed Computing and Networking, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 502–512.
Al-Fagih, A. E., & Hassanein, H. S. (2012). Routing schemes for delay-tolerant networks-an applications perspective. Technical Report, 588, 1–40.
Chuah, M. C., & Ma, W. B. (2006). Integrated buffer and route management in a DTN with message ferry. 2006 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM 2006), Washington, US, pp. 1–7.
Chuah, M. C., Yang, P., et al. (2006). Store-and-forward performance in a DTN. IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2006-Spring), 5, 187–191.
Dimitriou, S., & Tsaoussidis, V. (2009). Effective buffer and storage management in DTN nodes. 2009 International Conference on Ultra Modern Telecommunications & Workshops, 2009 (ICUMT’09), pp. 1–3.
Krifa, A., & Baraka, C., et al. (2008). Optimal buffer management policies for delay tolerant networks. 5th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON’08), pp. 260–268.
Mahendran, V., & Praveen, T. et al. (2012). Impact of Persistent Storage on the DTN Routing Performance. Distributed Computing and Networking, pp. 513–524.
Vasilakos, A. V., Zhang, Y., & Spyropoulos, T. (2012). Delay tolerant networks: Protocols and applications. CRC Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Z., Zhang, Q., Wang, R. et al. On storage dynamics of space delay/disruption tolerant network node. Wireless Netw 20, 2529–2541 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0756-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0756-4