Group selection and contextual analysis | Synthese Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Group selection and contextual analysis

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-level selection can be understood via the Price equation or contextual analysis, which offer incompatible statistical decompositions of evolutionary change into components of group and individual selection. Okasha (Evolution and the levels of selection, 2006) argued that each approach suffers from problem cases. I introduce further problem cases for the Price approach, arguing that it is appropriate for MLS 2 group selection but not MLS 1. I also show that the problem cases Okasha raises for contextual analysis can be resolved. For some such cases, however, it emerges that there is no determinate answer to the question of how much of the total selective effect was due to group selection compared to individual selection. This suggests that when there is interaction between the effect of group character and individual character, one cannot separate selection into distinct ‘levels’ at all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The general decomposition is \(\hbox {w}_{\mathrm{i} }=-srZ_i^2 +srz_i Z_i +\left( {\frac{s}{2}-tr} \right) Z_i +trz_i +t/2\), where \(\hbox {r}=2\hbox {p}-1\).

References

  • Boyd, L. H., & Iversen, G. R. (1979). Contextual analysis: Concepts and statistical techniques. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damuth, J., & Heisler, I. L. (1988). Alternative formulations of multilevel selection. Biology and Philosophy, 3, 407–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight, C. J., Shwartz, J. M., & Stevens, L. (1992). Contextual analysis of models of group selection, soft selection, hard selection, and the evolution of altruism. American Naturalist, 140, 743–761.

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1963). The evolution of altruistic behaviour. American Naturalist, 97, 354–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisler, I. L., & Damuth, J. (1987). A method for analyzing selection in hierarchically structured populations. The American Naturalist, 130(4), 582–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. (1970). The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunney, L. (1985). Group selection, altruism, and structured-deme Models. American Naturalist, 126, 212–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Price, G. R. (1970). Selection and covariance. Nature, 227, 520–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller, D. C. (1985). Kinship, reciprocity and synergism in the evolution of social behavior. Nature, 318, 366–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (1964). Group selection and kin selection. Nature, 201, 1145–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (2011). Realism, conventionalism, and causal decomposition in units of selection: Reflections on Samir Okasha’s evolution and the levels of selection. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82(1), 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1984). The nature of selection. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, C. (2004). Selection, drift, and the “forces” of evolution. Philosophy of Science, 71, 550–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. J., Goodnight, C. J., & Stephens, L. (1999). Design and interpretation of experimental studies of interdemic selection: A reply to Getty. American Naturalist, 154, 599–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, A., Griffin, A. S., & Gardner, A. (2006). Social Semantics: Altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 415–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (1975). A theory of group selection. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences USA, 72, 143–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (1980). The natural selection of populations and communities. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. A. (2003). Pluralism, entwinement, and the levels of selection. Philosophy of Science, 70, 531–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Seneca College, 1750 Finch Ave E, Toronto, ON, M2J 2X5, Canada

    Eugene Earnshaw

Authors
  1. Eugene Earnshaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugene Earnshaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Earnshaw, E. Group selection and contextual analysis. Synthese 192, 305–316 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0569-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0569-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation