Reliability analysis of complete cubic networks based on extra conditional fault | The Journal of Supercomputing Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability analysis of complete cubic networks based on extra conditional fault

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reliability of multiprocessor systems is now a crucial concern in parallel computing, which can be characterized as connectivity and diagnosability. The s-extra connectivity (s-EC) \(\kappa _s(G)\) of a network G is the minimum number of nodes whose deletion disconnects the network G, and every remaining component has no less than \(s+1\) nodes. The s-extra diagnosability (s-ED) \(t_s(G)\) of a network G is the maximum cardinality of faulty nodes that can be identified, given that each remaining component has at least \(s+1\) nodes. This paper investigates the s-EC and s-ED of the complete cubic network CCN(n). Specifically, we initially demonstrate that the s-EC of CCN(n) is \(\kappa _s(CCN(n))=(s+1)(n+1)-\frac{s(s+3)}{2}\) for \(n\ge 3\) and \(0\le s\le n-2\). Subsequently, we demonstrate that the s-ED under the PMC model is \(t_s(CCN(n))=(s+1)(n+1)-\frac{s(s+3)}{2}+s\) for \(n\ge 3\) and \(1\le s\le n-2\). Similarly, under the MM* model, the s-ED is \(t_s(CCN(n))=(s+1)(n+1)-\frac{s(s+3)}{2}+s\) for \(n\ge 6\) and \(1\le s\le \frac{n-2}{4}\). Finally, we conduct simulation experiments, and the results indicate that the s-EC consistently surpasses other known connectivities, including classical connectivity and s-component connectivity. Additionally, the s-ED consistently outperforms classical diagnosability and s-component diagnosability of CCN(n).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Bondy JA, Murty USR (2008) Graph theory. New York

  2. Cheng E, Qiu K, Shen Z (2015) Connectivity results of complete cubic networks as associated with linearly many faults. J Interconnect Netw 15:1550007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fàbrega J, Fiol MA (1996) On the extraconnectivity of graphs. Discrete Math 155:49–57

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghose K, Desai KR (1995) Hierarchical cubic networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 6:427–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gu M-M, Hao R-X, Liu J-B (2017) On the extraconnectivity of \(k\)-ary \(n\)-cube networks. Int J Comput Math 94:95–106

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Gu M-M, Hao R-X, Xu J-M, Feng Y-Q (2017) Equal relation between the extra connectivity and pessimistic diagnosability for some regular graphs. Theoret Comput Sci 690:59–72

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang H, Hao R-X, Qin X-W, Lin C-K, Hsieh S-Y (2023) The high faulty tolerant capability of the alternating group graphs. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 34:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo H, Sabir E, Mamut A (2022) The \(g\)-extra connectivity of folded crossed cubes. J Parallel Distrib Comput 166:139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li L, Zhang X, Zhu Q, Bai Y (2022) The 3-extra conditional diagnosability of balanced hypercubes under MM* model. Discrete Appl Math 309:310–316

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Li X, Fan J, Lin C-K, Cheng B, Jia X (2019) The extra connectivity, extra conditional diagnosability and \(t/k\)-diagnosability of the data center network DCell. Theoret Comput Sci 766:16–29

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Li X, Lin C-K, Fan J, Jia X, Cheng B, Zhou J (2021) Relationship between extra connectivity and component connectivity in networks. Comput J 64:38–53

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin W, Zhuang H, Li X, Zhang Y (2024) Reliability evaluation of generalized exchanged \(X\)-cubes under the \(R_g\)-conditional restriction. J Supercomput 80:11401–11430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhuang H, Guo W, Li X, Liu X, Lin C-K (2022) The component diagnosability of general networks. Int J Found Comput Sci 33:67–89

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen M, Habib M, Lin C-K (2023) Diagnosability for a family of matching composition networks. J Supercomput 79:7584–7608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun X, Fan J, Sabir E, Cheng B, Yu J (2023) Reliability of augmented \(k\)-ary \(n\)-cubes under the extra connectivity condition. J Supercomput 79:13641–13669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang G, Lin C-K, Fan J, Cheng B, Jia X (2020) A novel low cost interconnection architecture based on the generalized hypercube. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 31:647–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yi Y, Fan J, Cheng B, Wang Y, Yu J (2022) The 3-extra connectivity of the data center network BCube. Comput J 65:3199–3208

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin L, Zhou S, Xu L, Wang D (2015) The extra connectivity and conditional diagnosability of alternating group networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 26:2352–2362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin L, Hsieh S-Y, Xu L, Zhou S, Chen R (2018) The relationship between extra connectivity and conditional diagnosability of regular graphs under the PMC model. J Comput Syst Sci 95:1–18

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin L, Huang Y, Lin Y, Hsieh S-Y, Xu L (2022) FFNLFD: fault diagnosis of multiprocessor systems at local node with fault-free neighbors under PMC model and MM* model. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 33:1739–1751

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lin L, Huang Y, Xu L, Hsieh S-Y (2021) A complete fault tolerant method for extra fault diagnosability of alternating group graphs. IEEE Trans Reliab 70:957–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Song J, Lin L, Huang Y, Hsieh S-Y (2023) Intermittent fault diagnosis of split-star networks and its applications. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 34:1253–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Malek M (1980) A comparison connection assignment for diagnosis of multiprocessor systems. In: Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Computer Architecture, pp 31–36

  24. Maeng J, Malek M (1981) A comparison connection assignment for self-diagnosis of multiprocessor systems. In: Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing, pp 173–175

  25. Preparata FP, Metze G, Chien RT (1967) On the connection assignment problem of diagnosable systems. IEEE Trans Electron Comput EC–16:848–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sengupta A, Dahbura AT (1992) On self-diagnosable multiprocessor systems: diagnosis by the comparison approach. IEEE Trans Comput 41:1386–1396

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang M, Wang S (2021) Connectivity and diagnosability of center \(k\)-ary \(n\)-cubes. Discrete Appl Math 294:98–107

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang X, Evans DJ, Megson GM (2006) On the maximal connected component of hypercube with faulty vertices III. Int J Comput Math 83:27–37

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu J, Zhou S, Wang D, Zhang H (2022) Component diagnosability in terms of component connectivity of hypercube-based compound networks. J Parallel Distrib Comput 162:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu X, Zhou S, Cheng E, Zhang H (2023) Reliability analysis of the generalized balanced hypercube. Theoret Comput Sci 942:297–311

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu X, Zhou S, Li J (2017) Reliability of complete cubic networks under the condition of \(g\)-good-neighbor. Comput J 60:625–635

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang H, Meng J (2021) Reliability of DQcube based on \(g\)-extra conditional fault. Comput J 64:1393–1400

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang S, Yang W (2016) The \(g\)-extra conditional diagnosability and sequential \(t/k\)-diagnosability of hypercubes. Int J Comput Math 93:482–497

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China under grant (Nos. 62302235 and 62202250) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Nos. BK20230352 and BK20200753).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Mengjie Lv and Xuanli Liu wrote the main manuscript text,Hui Dong and Weibei Fan prepared figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengjie Lv.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I declare that the authors have no Conflict of interest as defined by Springer, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, M., Liu, X., Dong, H. et al. Reliability analysis of complete cubic networks based on extra conditional fault. J Supercomput 80, 21952–21974 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06272-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06272-w

Keywords

Navigation