Deployment techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey, classification, challenges, and future research issues | The Journal of Supercomputing Skip to main content
Log in

Deployment techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey, classification, challenges, and future research issues

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have been considered as one of the fine research areas in recent years because of vital role in numerous applications. To process the extracted data and transmit it to the various location, a large number of nodes must be deployed in a proper way because deployment is one of the major issues in WSNs. Hence, the minimum number of node deployment to attain full coverage is of enormous significance for research. The prime agenda of the presented paper is to categorize various coverage techniques into four major parts: computational geometry-based techniques, force-based techniques, grid-based techniques, and metaheuristic-based techniques. Additionally, several comparisons amid these schemes are provided in view of their benefits and drawbacks. Our discussion weighs on the classification of coverage, practical challenges in the deployment of WSNs, sensing models, and research issues in WSNs. Moreover, a detailed analysis of performance metrics and comparison among various WSNs simulators is listed. In conclusion, standing research issues along with potential work guidelines are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yaqoob I et al (2017) Internet of things architecture: recent advances, taxonomy, requirements, and open challenges. IEEE Wirel Commun 24:10–16

    Google Scholar 

  2. Husain S, Prasad A, Kunz A, Papageorgiou A, Song J (2015) Recent trends in standards related to the internet of things and machine-to-machine communications. J Inf Commun Converg Eng 12:228–236

    Google Scholar 

  3. Almonacid V, Franck L (2017) Extending the coverage of the internet of things with low-cost nanosatellite networks. Acta Astronaut 138:95–101

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rawat P, Singh KD, Chaouchi H, Bonnin JM (2014) Wireless sensor networks: a survey on recent developments and potential synergies. J Supercomput 68:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gherbi C, Aliouat Z, Benmohammed M (2017) A survey on clustering routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. Sensor Rev 37(1):12–25

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Y (2012) Wireless sensor network applications in smart grid: recent trends and challenges. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 8:492819

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yick J, Mukherjee B, Ghosal D (2008) Wireless sensor network survey. Comput Netw 52:2292–2330

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng J, Jamalipour A (2009) Wireless sensor networks: a networking perspective. John Wiley & Sons

  9. Dulman SO, Chatterjea S, Havinga PJ (2005) Introduction to wireless sensor networks. In: Embedded systems handbook. Taylor & Francis CRC Press, pp 31

  10. Rashid B, Rehmani MH (2016) Applications of wireless sensor networks for urban areas: a survey. J Netw Comput Appl 60:192–219

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pule M, Yahya A, Chuma J (2017) Wireless sensor networks: a survey on monitoring water quality. J Appl Res Technol 15:562–570

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mohd Kassim MR, Mat I, Harun AN (2014) Wireless sensor network in precision agriculture application. In: 2014 International Conference on Computer, Information and Telecommunication Systems, CITS 2014

  13. Abdollahzadeh S, Navimipour NJ (2016) Deployment strategies in the wireless sensor network: a comprehensive review. Comput Commun 91–92:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang H, Hou JC (2006) Is deterministic deployment worse than random deployment for wireless sensor networks? In: Proceedings—IEEE INFOCOM

  15. Aznoli F, Navimipour NJ (2017) “Deployment strategies in the wireless sensor networks: systematic literature review, classification, and current trends. Wirel Pers Commun 95:819–846

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma V, Patel RB, Bhadauria HS, Prasad D (2016) Deployment schemes in wireless sensor network to achieve blanket coverage in large-scale open area: a review. Egypt Inform J 17(1):45–56

    Google Scholar 

  17. Felemban E (2013) Advanced border intrusion detection and surveillance using wireless sensor network technology. Int J Commun Netw Syst Sci 6:251

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang J, Zhang C, Li X, Huang Y, Fu S, Acevedo MF (2010) Integration of wireless sensor networks in environmental monitoring cyber infrastructure. Wirel Netw 16:1091–1108

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen D, Liu Z, Wang L, Dou M, Chen J, Li H (2013) Natural disaster monitoring with wireless sensor networks: a case study of data-intensive applications upon low-cost scalable systems. Mob Netw Appl 18:651–663

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang H, Wang J, Huang M (2013) Building a smart home system with WSN and service robot. In Proceedings—2013 5th Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, ICMTMA 2013

  21. Chang YJ, Chen CH, Lin LF, Han RP, Huang WT, Lee GC (2012) Wireless sensor networks for vital signs monitoring: application in a nursing home. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 8:685107

    Google Scholar 

  22. Koushanfar F, Potkonjak M, Sangiovanni-Vincentelli A (2004) Fault tolerance in wireless sensor networks. In: Handbook of sensor networks: compact wireless and wired sensing systems

  23. Liang Y, Li Y (2014) An efficient and robust data compression algorithm in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun Lett 18:139–442

    Google Scholar 

  24. Anisi MH, Abdul-Salaam G, Idris MYI, Wahab AWA, Ahmedy I (2017) Energy harvesting and battery power based routing in wireless sensor networks. Wirel Netw 23:249–266

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alrajeh NA, Bashir M, Shams B (2013) Localization techniques in wireless sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 9:304628

    Google Scholar 

  26. Senouci MR, Mellouk A (2016) 2—Random deployment. In: Senouci MR, Mellouk A (eds) Deploying wireless sensor networks. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 21–34

    Google Scholar 

  27. Senouci MR, Mellouk A (2016) 3—Deterministic deployment. In: Senouci MR, Mellouk A (eds) Deploying wireless sensor networks. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 35–59

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu C, Zheng C, Shu L, Han G (2012) A survey on coverage and connectivity issues in wireless sensor networks. J Netw Comput Appl 35:619–632

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pereira F, Correia R, Carvalho NB (2018) Comparison of active and passive sensors for IoT applications. In: 2018 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC), pp 1–3

  30. Akan O, Talha Isik M, Baykal B (2009) Wireless passive sensor networks. IEEE Commun Mag 47:92–99

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Y, Zhang Y, Liu J, Bhandari R (2015) Coverage, connectivity, and deployment in wireless sensor networks. Recent development in wireless sensor and ad-hoc networks. Springer, New Delhi, pp 25–44

    Google Scholar 

  32. Doraipandian M, Neelamegam P (2013) Wireless sensor network using ARM processors: a review in hardware perspective. Int J Embed Real Time Commun Syst 4(4):48–59

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pathak M (2013) An approach to memory management in wireless sensor networks. Int J Comput Sci Eng Technol 4(08):1171–1176

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hossain A, Biswas PK, Chakrabarti S (2008) Sensing models and its impact on network coverage in wireless sensor network. In: 2008 IEEE Region 10 and the Third international Conference on Industrial and Information Systems, pp 1–5

  35. Sharma V, Patel RB, Bhadauria HS, Prasad D (2016) Deployment schemes in wireless sensor network to achieve blanket coverage in large-scale open area: a review. Egypt Inform J 17:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yu CW, Yu K, So W, Lin C, Lin CY (2011) Target coverage in wireless sensor networks. In: 2011 Seventh International Conference on Mobile Ad hoc and Sensor Networks, pp 408–412

  37. Kumar S, Lai TH, Arora A (2005) Barrier coverage with wireless sensors. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, pp 284–298

  38. Liu L, Xia F, Wang Z, Chen J, Sun Y (2005) Deployment issues in wireless sensor networks. In: Mobile Ad hoc and Sensor Networks, pp. 239–248

  39. Senouci M, Mellouk A, Aissani A (2014) Random deployment of wireless sensor networks: a survey and approach. Int J Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Comput 15:133–146

    Google Scholar 

  40. Silva R, Sa Silva J, Boavida F (2014) Mobility in wireless sensor networks—survey and proposal. Comput Commun 2014(52):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ramasamy V (2017) Mobile wireless sensor networks: an overview. In: Wireless Sensor Networks—Insights and Innovations

  42. Han K, Xiang L, Luo J, Liu Y (2012) Minimum-energy connected coverage in wireless sensor networks with omni-directional and directional features. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, pp 85–94

  43. Shah B, IlKim K (2014) A survey on three-dimensional wireless ad hoc and sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 10:616014

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gupta HP, Rao SV, Venkatesh T (2016) Analysis of stochastic coverage and connectivity in three-dimensional heterogeneous directional wireless sensor networks. Pervasive Mob Comput 29:38–56

    Google Scholar 

  45. Buranapanichkit D, Vittorioso A, Fortino G, Andreopoulos Y (2011) Comparison between centralized and distributed coordination for TDMA operation in wireless sensor networks. In London communications symposium

  46. So AMC, Ye Y (2005) On solving coverage problems in a wireless sensor network using voronoi diagrams. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

  47. Carbunar B, Grama A, Vitek J, Carbunar O (2004) Coverage preserving redundancy elimination in sensor networks. In: 2004 First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2004. IEEE SECON 2004. IEEE, pp 377–386

  48. Cărbunar B, Grama A, Vitek J, Cărbunar O (2006) Redundancy and coverage detection in sensor networks. ACM Trans Sens Netw 2:94–128

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ghosh A (2004) Estimating coverage holes and enhancing coverage in mixed sensor networks. In: Proceedings—Conference on Local Computer Networks, LCN

  50. Ghosh A, Das SK (2005) A distributed greedy algorithm for connected sensor cover in dense sensor networks. In: International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 340–353

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jiang J, Song Z, Zhang H, Dou W (2005) Voronoi-based improved algorithm for connected coverage problem in wireless sensor networks. In: Embedded and ubiquitous computing—EUC 2005, pp 224–233

  52. Boukerche A, Xin F (2007) A Voronoi approach for coverage protocols in wireless sensor networks. In: GLOBECOM—IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference

  53. Wang G, Cao G, La Porta T (2004) Movement-assisted sensor deployment. In: Proceedings—IEEE INFOCOM

  54. Tan Q et al (2015) Energy harvesting aware topology control with power adaptation in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw 24:44–56

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wei W, Sun Z, Song H, Wang H, Fan X, Chen X (2018) Energy balance-based steerable arguments coverage method in WSNs. IEEE Access 6:33766–33773

    Google Scholar 

  56. Han G, Liu L, Jiang J, Shu L, Hancke G (2017) Analysis of energy-efficient connected target coverage algorithms for industrial wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 13:135–143

    Google Scholar 

  57. Al-Karaki JN, Gawanmeh A (2017) The optimal deployment, coverage, and connectivity problems in wireless sensor networks: revisited. IEEE Access 5:18051–18065

    Google Scholar 

  58. Khalifa B, AlAghbari Z, Khedr AM, Abawajy JH (2017) Coverage hole repair in WSNs using cascaded neighbor intervention. IEEE Sens J 17:7209–7216

    Google Scholar 

  59. Gupta HP, Rao SV, Venkatesh T (2016) Sleep scheduling protocol for κ-coverage of three-dimensional heterogeneous WSNs. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 65:8423–8431

    Google Scholar 

  60. Cho HH, Shih TK, Chao HC (2016) A robust coverage scheme for UWSNs using the spline function. IEEE Sens J 16:3995–4002

    Google Scholar 

  61. Bao FS et al (2016) Coverage-based lossy node localization for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens J 16(11):4648–4656

    Google Scholar 

  62. Farsi M, El-Hosseini M, Badawy M, Arafat H, Zaineldin H (2019) Deployment techniques in wireless sensor networks, coverage and connectivity: a survey. IEEE Access 7:28940–28954

    Google Scholar 

  63. Yu X, Liu N, Huang W, Qian X, Zhang T (2013) A node deployment algorithm based on van der Waals force in wireless sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 9:505710

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lee DT, Schachter BJ (1980) Two algorithms for constructing a Delaunay triangulation. Int J Comput Inf Sci 9:219–242

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Abidin HZ, Din NM, Radzi NAM, Rizman ZI (2017) A review on sensor node placement techniques in wireless sensor networks. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 7(1):190–197

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wang X, Wang S (2011) Hierarchical deployment optimization for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 10:1028–1041

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mougou K, Mahfoudh S, Minet P, Laouiti A (2012) Redeployment of randomly deployed wireless mobile sensor nodes. In: IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference

  68. Al-Turjman F, Hassanein HS, Ibnkahla M (2017) Quantifying connectivity in wireless sensor networks with grid-based deployments. In: Cognitive Sensors and IoT: Architecture, Deployment, and Data Delivery

  69. Kim YH, Kim CM, Yang DS, Oh YJ, Han YH (2012) Regular sensor deployment patterns for p-coverage and q-connectivity in wireless sensor networks. In: The International Conference on Information Network, pp 290–295

  70. Liu Y, Suo L, Sun D, Wang A (2013) A virtual square grid-based coverage algorithm of redundant node for wireless sensor network. J Netw Comput Appl 36:811–817

    Google Scholar 

  71. Maksimović M, Milošević V (2016) Evaluating the optimal sensor placement for smoke detection. Yugosl J Oper Res 26(1):33–50

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  72. Fortune S (1995) Voronoi diagrams and Delaunay triangulations. In: Computing in Euclidean geometry, pp. 225–265

    Google Scholar 

  73. Qiu C, Shen H, Chen K (2018) An energy-efficient and distributed cooperation mechanism for k-coverage hole detection and healing in WSNs. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 17:1247–1259

    Google Scholar 

  74. Pananjady A, Bagaria VK, Vaze R (2017) Optimally approximating the coverage lifetime of wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 25:98–111

    Google Scholar 

  75. Alam SM, Haas ZJ (2006) Coverage and connectivity in three-dimensional networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, pp 346–357

  76. Li W, Zhang W (2012) Coverage analysis and active scheme of wireless sensor networks. IET Wirel Sens Syst 2:86–91

    Google Scholar 

  77. Mahboubi H, Aghdam AG (2017) Distributed deployment algorithms for coverage improvement in a network of wireless mobile sensors: relocation by virtual force. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst 4:736–748

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Stergiopoulos Y, Kantaros Y, Tzes A (2012) Connectivity-aware coordination of robotic networks for area coverage optimization. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, pp 31–35

  79. Habibi J, Mahboubi H, Aghdam AG (2017) A gradient-based coverage optimization strategy for mobile sensor networks. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst 4:477–488

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. Deng X, Tang Z, Yang LT, Lin M, Wang B (2018) Confident information coverage hole healing in hybrid industrial wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 14:2220–2229

    Google Scholar 

  81. Abbasi F, Mesbahi A, Mohammadpour Velni J (2019) A new voronoi-based blanket coverage control method for moving sensor networks. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 27:409–417

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  82. Dash D, Dasgupta A (2017) Distributed restoring of barrier coverage in wireless sensor networks using limited mobility sensors. IET Wirel Sens Syst 7(6):198–207

    Google Scholar 

  83. Sakai K, Te Sun M, Ku WS, Lai TH, Vasilakos AV (2015) A framework for the optimal k-coverage deployment patterns of wireless sensors. IEEE Sens J 15:7273–7283

    Google Scholar 

  84. Liao Z, Wang J, Zhang S, Cao J, Min G (2015) Minimizing movement for target coverage and network connectivity in mobile sensor networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 26:1971–1983

    Google Scholar 

  85. Stergiopoulos Y, Thanou M, Tzes A (2015) Distributed collaborative coverage-control schemes for non-convex domains. IEEE Trans Automat Control 60:2422–2427

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. Yang C, Chin K (2017) On nodes placement in energy harvesting wireless sensor networks for coverage and connectivity. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 13(1):27–36

    Google Scholar 

  87. Habibi J, Mahboubi H, Aghdam AG (2016) Distributed coverage control of mobile sensor networks subject to measurement error. IEEE Trans Automat Control 61:3330–3343

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. Yu J, Wan S, Cheng X, Yu D (2017) Coverage contribution area based k-coverage for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(9):8510–8523

    Google Scholar 

  89. Wu H, Shahidehpour M (2018) Applications of wireless sensor networks for area coverage in microgrids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 9:1590–1598

    Google Scholar 

  90. Sung T-W, Yang C-S (2014) Voronoi-based coverage improvement approach for wireless directional sensor networks. J Netw Comput Appl 39:202–213

    Google Scholar 

  91. Tsai CW, Tsai PW, Pan JS, Chao HC (2015) Metaheuristics for the deployment problem of WSN: a review. Microprocess Microsyst 39:1305–1317

    Google Scholar 

  92. Gupta SK, Kuila P, Jana PK (2016) Genetic algorithm for k-connected relay node placement in wireless sensor networks. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

  93. Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science. IEEE, pp 39–43

  94. Fan Z, Zhao W (2011) Network coverage optimization strategy in wireless sensor networks based on particle swarm optimization

  95. Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Tech Rep TR06 Erciyes Univ 200:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  96. Öztürk C, Karaboǧa D, Görkemli B (2012) Artificial bee colony algorithm for dynamic deployment of wireless sensor networks. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci 20(2):255–262

    Google Scholar 

  97. Dorigo M, Blum C (2005) Ant colony optimization theory: a survey. Theor Comput Sci 344(2–3):243–278

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  98. Liao WH, Kao Y, Wu RT (2011) Ant colony optimization based sensor deployment protocol for wireless sensor networks. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):6599–6605

    Google Scholar 

  99. Du KL, Swamy MNS (2016) Search and optimization by metaheuristics: techniques and algorithms inspired by nature. Birkhauser, Basel, Switzerland

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  100. El Khamlichi Y, Tahiri A, Abtoy A, Medina-Bulo I, Palomo-Lozano F (2017) A hybrid algorithm for optimal wireless sensor network deployment with the minimum number of sensor nodes. Algorithms 10:80

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  101. Gandomi AH, Alavi AH (2012) Krill herd: a new bio-inspired optimization algorithm. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 17:4831–4845

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  102. Wang GG, Gandomi AH, Alavi AH (2014) Stud krill herd algorithm. Neurocomputing 128:363–370

    Google Scholar 

  103. Wang GG, Gandomi AH, Alavi AH (2014) An effective krill herd algorithm with migration operator in biogeography-based optimization. Appl Math Model 38:2454–2462

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  104. Wang GG, Guo L, Gandomi AH, Hao GS, Wang H (2014) Chaotic Krill Herd algorithm. Inf Sci 274:17–34

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  105. Wang G, Guo L, Wang H, Duan H, Liu L, Li J (2014) Incorporating mutation scheme into krill herd algorithm for global numerical optimization. Neural Comput Appl 24:853–871

    Google Scholar 

  106. Wang GG, Deb S, Gandomi AH, Alavi AH (2016) Opposition-based krill herd algorithm with Cauchy mutation and position clamping. Neurocomputing 177:147–157

    Google Scholar 

  107. Wang H, Yi JH (2018) An improved optimization method based on krill herd and artificial bee colony with information exchange. Memetic Comput 10:177–198

    Google Scholar 

  108. Rizk-Allah RM, El-Sehiemy RA, Wang GG (2018) A novel parallel hurricane optimization algorithm for secure emission/economic load dispatch solution. Appl Soft Comput J 63:206–222

    Google Scholar 

  109. Wang G-G, Tan Y (2017) Improving metaheuristic algorithms with information feedback models. IEEE Trans Cybern 49:542–555

    Google Scholar 

  110. Wang G, Cai X, Cui Z, Min G, Chen J (2017) High performance computing for cyber physical social systems by using evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2017.2703784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Cui Z, Sun B, Wang G, Xue Y, Chen J (2017) A novel oriented cuckoo search algorithm to improve DV-Hop performance for cyber–physical systems. J Parallel Distrib Comput 103:42–52

    Google Scholar 

  112. Wang GG, Gandomi AH, Zhao X, Chu HCE (2016) Hybridizing harmony search algorithm with cuckoo search for global numerical optimization. Soft Comput 20:273–285

    Google Scholar 

  113. Cao B, Zhao J, Lv Z, Liu X, Kang X, Yang S (2018) Deployment optimization for 3D industrial wireless sensor networks based on particle swarm optimizers with distributed parallelism. J Netw Comput Appl 103:225–238

    Google Scholar 

  114. Wang G, Guo L, Duan H, Liu L, Wang H (2012) Dynamic deployment of wireless sensor networks by biogeography based optimization algorithm. J Sens Actuator Netw 1(86):96

    Google Scholar 

  115. Yun Z, Bai X, Xuan D, Lai TH, Jia W (2010) Optimal deployment patterns for full coverage and k-connectivity (k ≤ 6) wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 18(3):934–947

    Google Scholar 

  116. Rebai M, Le Berre M, Snoussi H, Hnaien F, Khoukhi L (2015) Sensor deployment optimization methods to achieve both coverage and connectivity in wireless sensor networks. Comput Oper Res 59:11–21

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  117. Chakrabarty K, Iyengar SS, Qi H, Cho E (2002) Grid coverage for surveillance and target location in distributed sensor networks. IEEE Trans Comput 51:1448–1453

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  118. Li J, Zhang B, Cui L, Chai S (2012) An extended virtual force-based approach to distributed self-deployment in mobile sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 8:417307

    Google Scholar 

  119. Gao X, Chen Z, Wu F, Chen G (2017) Energy efficient algorithms for k-sink minimum movement target coverage problem in mobile sensor network. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 25:3616–3627

    Google Scholar 

  120. Gupta SK, Kuila P, Jana PK (2016) Genetic algorithm approach for k-coverage and m-connected node placement in target based wireless sensor networks. Comput Electr Eng 56:544–556

    Google Scholar 

  121. Abo-Zahhad M, Ahmed SM, Sabor N, Sasaki S (2014) Coverage maximization in mobile wireless sensor networks utilizing immune node deployment algorithm. In: IEEE 27th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), pp 1–6

  122. Bendigeri KY, Mallapur JD (2014) Energy aware node placement algorithm for wireless sensor network. Adv Electron Electr Eng 4(6):541–548

    Google Scholar 

  123. George J, Sharma RM (2016) Relay node placement in wireless sensor networks using modified genetic algorithm. In: 2016 2nd International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Computing and Communication Technology (iCATccT), pp 551–556

  124. Jevtić M, Zogović N, Dimić G (2009) Evaluation of wireless sensor network simulators. In: Proceedings of the 17th telecommunications forum (TELFOR 2009), Belgrade, Serbia

  125. Rehmani MH, Saleem Y (2014) Network simulator NS-2. In: Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edition

  126. NS-3 (n.d.) http://ns3-code.com/ns-network-simulator-3/. Accessed 13 July 2019

  127. Riley GF, Henderson TR (2010) The ns-3 network simulator. Modeling and Tools for Network Simulation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 15–34

    Google Scholar 

  128. Mathworks (n.d.) MATLAB. https://in.mathworks.com/products/MATLAB.html. Accessed 14 July 2019

  129. Hunt BR, Lipsman RL, Rosenberg JM (2012) A guide to MATLAB. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164801

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  130. OMNET++ (n.d.) https://omnetpp.org/intro/. Accessed 14 July 2019

  131. NETSIM (n.d.) http://www.tetcos.com/. Accessed 14 July 2019

  132. Stadtfeld C (2015) NetSim: a social networks simulation tool in R. R package vignette. http://www.social-networks.ethz.ch/research/researchprojects.html

  133. Dâmaso A, Freitas D, Rosa N, Silva B, Maciel P (2013) Evaluating the power consumption of wireless sensor network applications using models. Sensors 13:3473–3500

    Google Scholar 

  134. Ahmad A, Roslan MF, Amira A (2017) Throughput, latency and cost comparisons of microcontroller-based implementations of wireless sensor network (WSN) in high jump sports. AIP Conf Proc 1883:020010

    Google Scholar 

  135. Zhong X, Liang Y (2019) Scalable downward routing for wireless sensor networks and internet of things actuation. In: Proceedings—conference on local computer networks, LCN

  136. Mounir TA, Mohamed PS, Cherif B, Amar B (2018) Positioning system for emergency situation based on RSSI measurements for WSN. In: PEMWN 2017—6th IFIP International Conference on Performance Evaluation and Modeling in Wired and Wireless Networks

  137. Marfievici R, Murphy AL, Pietro Picco G, Ossi F, Cagnacci F (2013) How environmental factors impact outdoor wireless sensor networks: a case study. In: Proceedings—IEEE 10th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems, MASS 2013

  138. Younis M, Akkaya K (2008) Strategies and techniques for node placement in wireless sensor networks: a survey. Ad Hoc Netw 6:621–655

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Priyadarshi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Priyadarshi, R., Gupta, B. & Anurag, A. Deployment techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey, classification, challenges, and future research issues. J Supercomput 76, 7333–7373 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03166-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03166-5

Keywords

Navigation