Knowledge flow out of the domain of information science: a bibliometric and citation analysis study | Scientometrics
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Knowledge flow out of the domain of information science: a bibliometric and citation analysis study

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through the bibliometric approach and citation analysis, this study analyzes the disciplines and subjects of literature citing important information science journals during the period from 1998 to 2010. The four information science journals under study include Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Information Processing and Management, the Journal of Information Science, and the Journal of Documentation. The Ulrich’s Periodical Directory, Library of Congress Subject Headings retrieved from WorldCat and the LISA database were used to identify the main classes, subclasses, and subjects of citing journals. We also indentify and analyze the highly citing journals, the main classes and subclasses of citing journals for the four journals under study as well as highly cited subjects in journals related to library and information science. Overall, the knowledge flow out of the domain of information science mainly includes information science itself, and also science and technology at a lower percentage. Moreover, there are minor outputs for various other subjects. The comparison of knowledge flow into and out of the domain of information science reveals the main knowledge flow is into information science itself. This comparison also reveals significant knowledge flow from computer science to information science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astrom, F. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced co-citation analysis of LIS journal articles, 1990–2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 947–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. L. (1999). Books, bytes, and behavior: Rethinking scholarly communication for a global information infrastructure. Information Services & Use, 19, 118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, B. C. (1969). Bradford law and the bibliography of science. Nature, 224, 953–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeHart, F. E. (1992). Monographic references and information science journal literature. Information Processing and Management, 28(5), 629–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, C. M. (2003). Getting cited: Ten tips for practitioners of citation analysis in the library. College and Research Libraries News, 64(1), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey-LC Conversion table made by OCLC. Accessed June 12, 2011 from http://www.questionpoint.org/crs/html/help/es/ask/ask_map_ddctolcc.html.

  • Gornstein, L., & Periz, B. C. (2013). Information and library science, changes that influenced it’s new character, direction and research: A bibliometric study, 1985–2006. Proceedings of the 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, 15th–19th July 2013, Vienna, Austria, (pp. 1019–1029).

  • Harter, S. P. (1996). The impact of electronic journals on scholarly communication: A citation analysis. Public Access Computer Systems Review, 7(5), 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. T. (1978). Bibliometrics of the online information retrieval literature. Online Review, 2, 345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houser, L. (1988). A conceptual analysis of information science. Library and Information Science Research, 10(1), 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISI Web of Knowledge, Journal Citation Reports, Online Help “How to analyze self-citation”, 2004 version.

  • Jarvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (1990). Content analysis of research articles in library and information science. Library and Information Science Research, 12(4), 395–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (1993). The evolution of library and information science 1965–1985: A content analysis of journal articles. Information Processing and Management, 29(1), 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, F. W. (1979). Information Retrieval Systems: Characteristics, Testing and Evaluation (2nd ed.). Arlington, VA: Information Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) (CSA). Accessed June 20, 2011 from http://search.proquest.com/lisashell?accountid=10067.

  • McCarthy, C. A. (2000). Journal of the century in library and information science. The Serials Librarian, 39(2), 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nour, M. M. (1985). A quantitative analysis of the research articles published in core library journals of 1980. Library and Information Science Research, 7(3), 261–273.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • OCLC WorldCat. Accessed June 12, 2011 from http://www.oclc.org/worldcat.

  • Paisley, W. (1990). Information science as a multidiscipline. In J. M. Pemberton & A. E. Prentice (Eds.), Information Science: The Interdisciplinary Context (pp. 3–24). New York: Neal-Schuman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peritz, B. C., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2002). The sources used by bibliometrics-scientometrics as reflected in references. Scientometrics, 54(2), 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saracevic, T. (1999). Information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, M. Y. (2011). A bibliometric analysis and comparison on three information science journals: JASIST, IPM, JOD, 1998–2008. Scientometrics, 58(2), 591–606.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, M. Y. (2013). Knowledge input for the domain of information science: A bibliometric and citation analysis study. Aslib Proceedings, 63(2), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory. Accessed June 10, 2011 from https://ulrichsweb.serialssolutions.com.

  • Web of Knowledge, Social Sciences Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. (2011). Accessed June 10, 2011 http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/JCR/JCR?RQ=RELATED_JOURNALS&rank=1&journal=J+INF+SCI&query_new=true.

  • White, H. D., & McCain, Katherine W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grant NSC-97-2410-H-004-153-MY3 from the National Science Council, Taiwan, R.O.C. Bibliometric data collected by Yu-wenTsai, Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies, National Chengchi University, Taiwan is very much appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies, National Chengchi University, Taipei, 116, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Ming-yueh Tsay

Authors
  1. Ming-yueh Tsay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-yueh Tsay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsay, My. Knowledge flow out of the domain of information science: a bibliometric and citation analysis study. Scientometrics 102, 487–502 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1339-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1339-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation