Divergence and convergence: technology-relatedness evolution in solar energy industry | Scientometrics Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Divergence and convergence: technology-relatedness evolution in solar energy industry

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exploring and measuring technology-relatedness and its collateral technology divergence and convergence, would have far-reaching theoretical significance and academic value on the chain mode of technology development, and also on the mastery of the laws for technology evolution and progress. Taking the patentometric analysis of solar energy technology worldwide as a case, employing the methodology of technology co-classification analysis, choosing two indicators, namely, mean technology co-classification partners (MTCP) and mean technology co-classification index (MTCI), we have analyzed and measured the evolving process of technology-relatedness. The results not only demonstrate in a direct manner the continuously advancing character of solar energy technology in the tensions of technology divergence and convergence, but also reveal quantitatively that, due to the chain reaction of technology-relatedness, technology divergence and technology convergence would tend to evolve in parallel. Through these, it is indicated that technology divergence and technology convergence are two trends which would develop separately, react mutually, and serve as causation for each other, thus making chain progress and continuously pushing forward the innovation, creation and upgrading of technologies. This is a regular phenomenon on condition that the specific technology area is in a status of sustainable development. It still awaits further research on how to verify and reveal the general principles on the interaction between technology divergence and convergence by conducting empirical studies and combining patent analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benner, M., & Waldfogel, J. (2008). Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity. Research Policy, 37(9), 1556–1567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkovski, B., & Gottschalk, C. M. (1997). Strengthening human resources for new and renewable energy technologies of the 21st century—UNESCO engineering education and training programme. Renewable Energy, 10(2–3), 441–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., et al. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, R., & Borgatti, S. (2013). Analytic Technologies-Ucinet. http://www.analytictech.com/downloaduc6.htm. Accessed 16 Feb 2013.

  • Chen, C. (2010). CiteSpace: 2003–2010. http://cluster.cis.drexel.edu/~cchen/citespace/. Accessed 16 March 2011.

  • Chen, C. (2013). CiteSpace: 2003–2013. http://cluster.cis.drexel.edu/~cchen/citespace/. Accessed 16 March 2013.

  • Chen, Y. L., & Chiu, Y. T. (2011). An IPC-based vector space model for patent retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 47(3), 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, C. S., & Leker, J. (2011). Patent indicators for monitoring convergence—examples from NFF and ICT. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Moura, A. M. M., & Caregnato, S. E. (2010). Co-classification between articles and patents: a study of the interaction between S & T on Brazilian Biotech. Informacao and Sociedade-Estudos, 20(2), 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, C. Q., & Velasco, C. A. B. (2010). Technological relatedness in interfirm cooperation agreements and the generation of innovations. Cuadernos De Economia Y Direccion De La Empresa, 13(45), 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. A. (1997). Brain sport: the 1996 world solar challenge solar car race across Australia. Progress in Photovoltaics, 5(1), 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussinger, K. (2010). On the importance of technological relatedness: SMEs versus large acquisition targets. Technovation, 30(1), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. American Economic Review, 76(5), 984–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1/2), 105–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, S. L., Chen, L. J., et al. (2013). Innovation and production in the global solar photovoltaic industry. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1021–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo, S. H., & Kim, Y. (2010). Measuring relatedness between technological fields. Scientometrics, 83(2), 435–454.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S. (2013). A new patent analysis using association rule mining and Box-Jenkins modeling for technology forecasting. Information-an International Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1B), 555–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, O. K., Mertz, A. W., et al. (2013). Analysis of microbial diversity on deli slicers using polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis technologies. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 56(2), 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotnour, T., & Bollo, T. R. (2011). Strategic management of a transformation in a multi-program technology program involving convergence and divergence of programs: observations from NASA. International Journal of Technology Management, 53(2–4), 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1977). The essential tension: selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P., Park, S. H., et al. (2013). Multiwavelength study of a solar eruption from AR NOAA 11112 I. Flux emergence, sunspot rotation and triggering of a solar flare. Solar Physics, 282(2), 503–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, M., Kemp, N., et al. (1996). Automatic extraction of citations from the text of English-language patents—An example of template mining. Journal of Information Science, 22(6), 423–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, M. E., Casman, E., et al. (2012). Nanotechnology patenting trends through an environmental lens: analysis of materials and applications. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 14(12), 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leten, B., Belderbos, R., et al. (2007). Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 567–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2008a). On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s cosine versus the Jaccard index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2008b). Patent classifications as indicators of intellectual organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1582–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linhares, D. C. L., Rovira, A., et al. (2012). Evaluation of Flinders Technology Associates cards for collection and transport of samples for detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 24(2), 328–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., & Wang, H. (1985). On technology developing model. Studies in Science of Science, 3(4), 10–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luan, C., Hou H., et al. (2012). Mapping the evolution of technology network in the field of solar energy technology. 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

  • Magerman, T., Van Looy, B., et al. (2010). Exploring the feasibility and accuracy of latent semantic analysis based text mining techniques to detect similarity between patent documents and scientific publications. Scientometrics, 82(2), 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., et al. (1998). Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27(5), 507–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noruzi, A., & Abdekhoda, M. (2012). Mapping Iranian patents based on International Patent Classification (IPC), from 1976 to 2011. Scientometrics, 93(3), 847–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, J. Q., Lu, L., et al. (2013). Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O. (2013). Bibexcel. http://www8.umu.se/inforsk/Bibexcel/. Accessed 20 March 2013.

  • Shin, D. H. (2010). Convergence and divergence: policy making about the convergence of technology in Korea. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spasser, M. A. (1997). Mapping the terrain of pharmacy: co-classification analysis of the international pharmaceutical abstracts database. Scientometrics, 39(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensma, H. K., Howard, M., et al. (2012). The compensatory relationship between technological relatedness, social interaction, and knowledge flow between firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(4), 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepanova, K. (2013). Development of Solar Energy Technologies. from http://www.eere.energy.gov/basics/renewable_energy/solar.html. Accessed 06 Feb 2013.

  • Sternitzke, C. (2009). Defining triadic patent families as a measure of technological strength. Scientometrics, 81(1), 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson Reuters, T. (2012). Derwent innovations index. http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/intellectual_property/ip_products/a-z/derwent_innovations_index/#tab2.s. Accessed 16 Sep 2012.

  • Tijssen, R. J. W. (1992). A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology—co-classification analysis of energy research. Research Policy, 21(1), 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, Y. H., Lin, C. J., et al. (2007). Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing and Management, 43(5), 1216–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylecote, A. (1998). Technical change and the world economy: convergence and divergence in technology strategies. R and D Management, 28(1), 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. W., Zhang, X., et al. (2011). Patent co-citation networks of fortune 500 companies. Scientometrics, 88(3), 761–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WIPO. (2011). Intellectual property statistics. http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/. Accessed 16 June 2012.

  • Zhao, J., Wang, A., et al. (1997). 20,000 PERL silicon cells for the 1996 world solar challenge solar car race. Progress in Photovoltaics, 5(4), 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 71073015 and 71103022; also Major Project of the National Social Science Fund of “Ethical issues of high-tech” under Grant No. 12&ZD117.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Administration and Law, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116085, People’s Republic of China

    Chunjuan Luan, Zeyuan Liu & Xianwen Wang

  2. WISE Lab, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116085, People’s Republic of China

    Chunjuan Luan, Zeyuan Liu & Xianwen Wang

Authors
  1. Chunjuan Luan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zeyuan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xianwen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luan, C., Liu, Z. & Wang, X. Divergence and convergence: technology-relatedness evolution in solar energy industry. Scientometrics 97, 461–475 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1057-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1057-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation