A review of quantum and hybrid quantum/classical blockchain protocols | Quantum Information Processing Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A review of quantum and hybrid quantum/classical blockchain protocols

  • Published:
Quantum Information Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blockchain technology is facing critical issues of scalability, efficiency and sustainability. These problems are necessary to solve if blockchain is to become a technology that can be used responsibly. Useful quantum computers could potentially be developed by the time that blockchain will be widely implemented for mission-critical work at financial and other institutions. Quantum computing will not only cause challenges for blockchain, but can also be harnessed to better implement parts of blockchain technologies including cryptocurrencies. We review the work that has been done in the area of quantum blockchain and hybrid quantum–classical blockchain technology and discuss open questions that remain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Fehr, S.: Quantum cryptography. Found. Phys. 40(5), 494–531 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9408-4

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Nofer, M., et al.: Blockchain. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 59(3), 183–187 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0467-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Bitcoin, Bitcoin https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2020

  4. Buterin, V.: Ethereum white paper: a next generation smart contract & decentralized application platform (2013). https://blockchainlab.com/pdf/Ethereum_white_papera_next_generation_smart_contract_and_decentralized_application_platform-vitalikbuterin.pdf. Accessed 5 may 2020

  5. Atzori, M.: Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: is the state still necessary? SSRN Electr. J. (2015). https://doi.org/10.2139/-ssrn.2709713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yaga, Dylan J., et al.: Blockchain Technology Overview. NIST (2018). https://www.nist.gov/publications/blockchain-technology-overview. Accessed 5 May 2020

  7. King, S., Nadal, S.: PPCoin: Peer-to-peer crypto-currency with proof-of-stake (2012). https://blockchainlab.com/pdf/peercoin-paper.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2020

  8. Editor.: Blockchain 2.0—What is Ethereum [Part 9]. OSTechNix (2019). https://www.ostechnix.com/blockchain-2-0-what-is-ethereum/

  9. Wiesner, S.: Conjugate coding. ACM SIGACT News 15(1), 78–88 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G.: Quantum public-key distribution reinvented. ACM SIGACT News 18(4), 51–53 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Unruh, D.: Computationally binding quantum commitments. In: Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2016 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 497–527 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49896-5_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ambainis, A., et al.: Quantum attacks on classical proof systems: the hardness of quantum rewinding. In: IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/focs.2014.57

  13. Fehr, S.: Classical proofs for the quantum collapsing property of classical hash functions. In: Theory of Cryptography Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 315–338 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03810-6_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Unruh, D.: Collapse-binding quantum commitments without random oracles. In: Advances in Cryptology—ASIACRYPT 2016 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 166–195 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53890-6_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Bertoni, G., et al.: On the indifferentiability of the sponge construction. In: Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2008 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 181–197 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78967-3_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Lutomirski, A., et al.: Breaking and making quantum money: toward a new quantum cryptographic protocol. In: Innovations in Computer Science—ICS 2010, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, January 5–7, 2010. Proceedings, pp. 20–31. Tsinghua University Press (2009)

  17. Zhandry, M.: Quantum lightning never strikes the same state twice. In: Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2019 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 408–438 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17659-4_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Coladangelo, A: Smart contracts meet quantum cryptography. (2019). arXiv:1902.05214

  19. Sun, X., et al.: A simple voting protocol on quantum blockchain. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58(1), 275–281 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rajan, D., Matt, V.: Quantum blockchain using entanglement in time. 1(1), 3–11 (2018)

  21. Megidish, et al.: Quantum tomography of inductively-created large multiphoton states. (2017). arXiv:1712.03633

  22. Megidish, et al.: Entanglement swapping between photons that have never coexisted. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(21), 210403 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. ConsenSys.: Get to Know the ConsenSys Mesh. ConsenSys Media, ConsenSys Media (2018). media.consensys.net/get-to-know-the-47-projects-that-make-up-the-consensys-mesh-478b7d3028c1

  24. Blockchain for Government: Smart Dubai. Blockchain for Government: Smart Dubai, consensys.net/enterprise-ethereum/use-cases/government-and-the-public-sector/smart-dubai/

  25. ConsenSys Releases Whitepaper At Dubai’s World Government Summit. ETHNews.com (2017). www.ethnews.com/consensys-releases-whitepaper-at-dubais-world-government-summit

  26. The Civil White Paper. Civil, civil.co/white-paper/

  27. A Free Legal Repository. OpenLaw. www.openlaw.io/

  28. Oved, M., Don, M.: Swap: A Peer-to-Peer Protocol for Trading Ethereum Tokens. Whitepaper Database (2017). whitepaperd-atabase.com/airswap-ast-whitepaper/

  29. Verified Organic and ConsenSys-Backed Treum Launch Ethereum Blockchain Solution to Track and Trace the First Commercial Hemp Crop Planted in Arizona. IT Supply Chain (2019). itsupplychain.com/verified-organic-and-consensys-backed-treum-launch-ethereum-blockchain-solution-to-track-and-trace-the-first-commercial-hemp-crop-planted-in-arizona/

  30. Vujicic, D., et al.: Blockchain Technology, bitcoin, and ethereum: A brief overview. In: 2018 17th International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/infoteh.2018.8345547

  31. Goh, B., Alun, J.: China Wants to Ban Bitcoin Mining. Reuters, Thomson Reuters (2019). www.reuters.com/article/us-china-cryptocurrency/china-wants-to-ban-Bitcoin-mining-idUSKCN1RL0C4

  32. Schaus, P.: Blockchain Projects Will Pay Off—10 Years from Now. American Banker (2016). www.americanbanker.com/opinion/blockchain-projects-will-pay-off-10-years-from-now

  33. Macheel, T.: Banks Will Start Actually Using Blockchain Next Year: IBM Report. American Banker (2016). www.americanbanker.co-m/news/banks-will-start-actually-using-blockchain-next-year-ibm-report

  34. NXM Labs Acclaimed by Frost & Sullivan for Its Revolutionary Autonomous Security Platform for IoT. J. Eng. p. 573 (2019)

  35. Matier, J., Pete, W.: Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL). QRL Whitepaper (2016). github.com/theQRL/Whitepaper/blob/master/-QRL\_whitepaper.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada

    M. Edwards & S. Ghose

  2. School of Information Technology Management, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada

    A. Mashatan

  3. Department of Physics and Computer Science, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada

    S. Ghose

Authors
  1. M. Edwards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Mashatan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Ghose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Ghose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Edwards, M., Mashatan, A. & Ghose, S. A review of quantum and hybrid quantum/classical blockchain protocols. Quantum Inf Process 19, 184 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-020-02672-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-020-02672-y

Keywords