Robust Subspace Clustering via Latent Smooth Representation Clustering | Neural Processing Letters Skip to main content
Log in

Robust Subspace Clustering via Latent Smooth Representation Clustering

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subspace clustering aims to group high-dimensional data samples into several subspaces which they were generated. Among the existing subspace clustering methods, spectral clustering-based algorithms have attracted considerable attentions because of their predominant performances shown in many subspace clustering applications. In this paper, we proposed to apply smooth representation clustering (SMR) to the reconstruction coefficient vectors which were obtained by sparse subspace clustering (SSC). Because the reconstruction coefficient vectors could be regarded as a kind of good representations of original data samples, the proposed method could be considered as a SMR performed in a latent subspace found by SSC and hoped to achieve better performances. For solving the proposed latent smooth representation algorithm (LSMR), we presented an optimization method and also discussed the relationships between LSMR with some related algorithms. Finally, experiments conducted on several famous databases demonstrate that the proposed algorithm dominates the related algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Namely, if \({\Vert{\mathbf{x}}_{i} - {\mathbf{x}}_{j}\Vert}_{2}^{2}\to 0\), we have \({\Vert{\mathbf{c}}_{i} - {\mathbf{c}}_{j}\Vert}_{2}^{2}\to 0.\)

  2. In our experiments, \(\varepsilon =0.01.\)

  3. It also contains a sequence of 5 motions which is called “dancing”. We neglect this sub-database in our experiments.

  4. The choices of PCA dimension is followed the suggestion in [5].

  5. Segmentation error = 1 − segmentation accuracy.

References

  1. Parsons L, Haque E, Liu H (2004) Subspace clustering for high dimensional data: a review. SIGKDD Explor Newsl ACM Spec Interes Gr Knowl Discov Data Min 6:90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vidal R (2011) Subspace clustering. IEEE Signal Process Mag 28:52–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2010.939739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Elhamifar E, Vidal R (2009) Sparse subspace clustering. In: 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop CVPR Workshops 2009, IEEE, pp 2790–2797. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2009.5206547

  4. Elhamifar E, Vidal R (2013) Sparse subspace clustering: algorithm, theory, and applications. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35:2765–2781. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2013.57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu G, Lin Z, Yu Y (2010) Robust subspace segmentation by low-rank representation. In: ICML 2010—proceedings, 27th international conference on machine learning

  6. Liu G, Lin Z, Yan S et al (2013) Robust recovery of subspace structures by low-rank representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2012.88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rao S, Tron R, Vidal R, Ma Y (2010) Motion segmentation in the presence of outlying, incomplete, or corrupted trajectories. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2009.191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma Y, Derksen H, Hong W, Wright J (2007) Segmentation of multivariate mixed data via lossy data coding and compression. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vidal R, Favaro P (2014) Low rank subspace clustering (LRSC). Pattern Recognit Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2013.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei L, Wu A, Yin J (2015) Latent space robust subspace segmentation based on low-rank and locality constraints. Expert Syst Appl 42:6598–6608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shi J, Malik J (2000) Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.868688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu R, Lin Z, De La Torre F, Su Z (2012) Fixed-rank representation for unsupervised visual learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

  13. Liu G, Yan S (2011) Latent low-rank representation for subspace segmentation and feature extraction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision

  14. Li CG, Vidal R (2015) Structured sparse subspace clustering: a unified optimization framework. In: Proceedings of the IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

  15. Li CG, You C, Vidal R (2017) Structured sparse subspace clustering: a joint affinity learning and subspace clustering framework. IEEE Trans Image Process 26:2988–3001. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2017.2691557

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen H, Wang W, Feng X (2018) Structured sparse subspace clustering with within-cluster grouping. Pattern Recognit. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.05.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhuang L, Gao H, Lin Z et al (2012) Non-negative low rank and sparse graph for semi-supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

  18. Tang K, Liu R, Su Z, Zhang J (2014) Structure-constrained low-rank representation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2014.2306063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei L, Wang X, Yin J, Wu A (2016) Spectral clustering steered low-rank representation for subspace segmentation. J Vis Commun Image Represent 38:386–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2016.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu X, Wang Y, Yuan Y (2013) Graph-regularized low-rank representation for destriping of hyperspectral images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 51:4009–4018. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2226730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yin M, Gao J, Lin Z (2016) Laplacian regularized low-rank representation and its applications. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 38:504–517. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2462360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu CY, Min H, Zhao ZQ, et al (2012) Robust and efficient subspace segmentation via least squares regression. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence lecture notes in bioinformatics). LNCS, vol 7578, pp 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33786-4_26

  23. Hu H, Lin Z, Feng J, Zhou J (2014) Smooth representation clustering. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2014.484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu J, Tao D, Wang M, Rui Y (2015) Learning to rank using user clicks and visual features for image retrieval. IEEE Trans Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2014.2336697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hong C, Yu J, Tao D, Wang M (2015) Image-based three-dimensional human pose recovery by multiview locality-sensitive sparse retrieval. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62:3742–3751. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2014.2378735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hong C, Yu J, Zhang J et al (2019) Multimodal face-pose estimation with multitask manifold deep learning. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2884211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang J, Yu J, Tao D (2018) Local deep-feature alignment for unsupervised dimension reduction. IEEE Trans Image Process. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2018.2804218

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu J, Tan M, Zhang H et al (2019) Hierarchical deep click feature prediction for fine-grained image recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2019.2932058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu J, Zhu C, Zhang J et al (2020) Spatial pyramid-enhanced NetVLAD with weighted triplet loss for place recognition. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2908982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu J, Yao J, Zhang J et al (2020) SPRNet: single-pixel reconstruction for one-stage instance segmentation. IEEE Trans Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2020.2969046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin Z, Chen M, Ma Y (2010) The augmented Lagrange multiplier method for exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2012.10.010

  32. Wright J, Yang AY, Ganesh A et al (2009) Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2008.79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2001) Pattern classification. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Bartels RH, Stewart GW (1972) Solution of the matrix equation AX + XB = C [F4]. Commun ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/361573.361582

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Wei L, Wang X, Wu A et al (2018) Robust subspace segmentation by self-representation constrained low-rank representation. Neural Process Lett 48:1671–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-018-9783-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tron R, Vidal R (2007) A benchmark for the comparison of 3-D motion segmentation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

  37. Samaria FS, Harter AC (1994) Parameterisation of a stochastic model for human face identification. In: IEEE workshop on applications of computer vision—proceedings

  38. Lee KC, Ho J, Kriegman DJ (2005) Acquiring linear subspaces for face recognition under variable lighting. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2005.92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nene S, Nayar S, Murase H (1996) Columbia object image library (COIL-20). Tech Rep

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lai Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, X., Wei, L. Robust Subspace Clustering via Latent Smooth Representation Clustering. Neural Process Lett 52, 1317–1337 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-020-10306-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-020-10306-8

Keywords

Navigation