Otsu’s thresholding technique for MRI image brain tumor segmentation | Multimedia Tools and Applications Skip to main content
Log in

Otsu’s thresholding technique for MRI image brain tumor segmentation

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MRI image segmentation is very challenging area in medical image processing. It is implemented with the low contract of MRI scan. In terms of certain input features or expert information, the major objective of medical image segmentation is to isolate and describe anatomical constitutions. In MRI image segmentation, brain tumor segmentation is more difficult because of its complex structure. The Otsu’s thresholding method is well-known method in image segmentation. In this paper, choosing the classes or bins of Otsu’s thresholding are analyzed on MRI image brain tumor segmentation. As a preprocessing, the 2D MRI images are convert the grayscale image and resized to the same size. And then, median filter is utilized to eliminate the noise from MRI image. In MRI image segmentation, the varieties of classes or bins of Otsu’s thresholding are utilized to segment the brain tumor from MRI images. Then, the morphological operation is used to achieve the accurate tumor regions. All of the experiments are tested on 2015 BRATS dataset. As segmentation quality validation metric, Jaccard similarity index, true positive rate (Sensitivity), true negative rate (Specificity) and accuracy are used to validate the segmented results and their ground truth. According to the results, level 4 or class 4 got 68.7955% in true positive and 95.5593% in accuracy. Class 4 is the best or suitable for MRI image segmentation according to experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmad S, Mebarek-Oudina F, Mehfuz S, Beg J (2022) RSM analysis based cloud access security broker: a systematic literature review. Clust Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-022-03598-z

  2. Ali AH, Khalaph KA, Nema IS (2014) IOSR J Res Method Educ (IOSR-JRME) 4 (1.-II): 58-62

  3. Anandgaonkar G, Sable G (2014) Brain tumor detection and identification from T1 post contrast MR images using cluster-based segmentation. Int J Scid Res 3(4):814–817

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bindu CH (2009) An improved medical image segmentation algorithm using Otsu method. Int J Recent Trends Eng 2(3):88–90

    Google Scholar 

  5. Binduand CH, Prasad KS (2012) An efficient medical image segmentation using conventional OTSU method. Int J Adv Sci Tech 38:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dargan S, Kumar M (2020) A comprehensive survey on the biometric recognition systems based on physiological and behavioral modalities. Expert Syst Appl 143:113114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dargan S, Kumar M, Ayyagari MR, Kumar G (2020) A survey of deep learning and its applications: a new paradigm to machine learning. Arch Computat Methods Eng 27:1071–1092

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaikwad DP, Abhang P, Bedekar P (2011) Medical image segmentation for brain tumor detection. Proceedings of the International Conference & Workshop on Emerging Trends in Technology, Mumbai, pp 63–65

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gao Q, Wang XY, Qiu SJ, Yamato I, Sho M, Nakajima Y, Xu Y (2009) Over expression of PD-L1 significantly associates with tumor aggressiveness and post operative recurrence in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 15(3):971–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghosh KK, Begum S, Sardar A, Adhikary S, Ghosh M, Kumar M, Sarkar R (2021) Theoretical and empirical analysis of filter ranking methods: experimental study on benchmark DNA microarray data. Expert Syst Appl 169:114485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta S, Thakur K, Kumar M (2021) 2D-human face recognition using SIFT and SURF descriptors of face’s feature regions. Vis Comput 37:447–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaur P, Kumar R, Kumar M (2019) A healthcare monitoring system using random forest and internet of things (IoT). Multimedia Tools Applications 78:19905–19916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kazi IM, Chowhan SS, Kulkarni UV (2017) MRI brain image segmentation using adaptive thresholding and K-means algorithm. Int J Compr Appl 167(8):11–15

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar A, Kumar M, Kaur A (2021) Face detection in still images under occlusion and non-uniform illumination. Multimed Tools Appl 80:14565–14590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Kleihues P (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114(2):97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Min A, War N (2019) Comparative Experiments of Brain Tumor Segmentation Methods in MRI image. Proceedings of the seventeenth international conference on computer applications (ICCA 2019), Yangon, Myanmar, Feb. 2019, pp. 287–293

  17. Mishra A, Rai A, Yadav A (2014) Medical image processing: a challenging analysis. International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology 6(2):187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ozols RF, Herbst RS, Colson YL, Gralow J, Bonner J, Curran WJ, Markman M (2006) Major research advances in cancer treatment, prevention, and screening report from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 25(1):146–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Prince JL, Links JM (2006) Medical imaging signals and systems. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

  20. Sasilatha T, Mahalakshmi R, Kumarand Dhanya PSM (2017) An efficient strategy over brain tumour analysis using image processing techniques. International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology 9(3):30688–30697

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sheeba A, Manikandan S (2014) Image segmentation using bi-level thresholding, proceedings of the 2014 international conference on electronics and communication systems (ICECS). IEEE, pp 1-5

  22. Srikanth R, Bikshalu K (2019) Segmentation of low contrast satellite and medical images based on level set function with harmony search optimization algorithm. Int J Eng Adv Tech (IJEAT) 9:7306–7313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sujan M, Alam N, Abdullah S, Jahirul M (2016) A segmentation based automated system for brain tumor detection. Int J Comp Appl 153(10):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  24. Taheri S, Ong SH, Chong VFH (2010) Level-set segmentation of brain tumors using a threshold-based speed function. Image Vis Comput 28(1):26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tanuja PS, Patil SB (2016) Detection of brain tumor based on segmentation using region growing method. Int J Eng Innov & Res 5(2):173–176

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vijayarangan V (2014) Multiscale modeling for image analysis of brain tumor detection and segmentation using histogram thresholding. Int J Eng Comp Sci 3(8):7525–7534

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xuan X, Liao Q (2007) Statistical structure analysis in MRI brain tumor segmentation. Fourth International Conference on Image and Graphics. Sichuan, China, pp 421–426

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Mebarek-Oudina.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nyo, M.T., Mebarek-Oudina, F., Hlaing, S.S. et al. Otsu’s thresholding technique for MRI image brain tumor segmentation. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 43837–43849 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13215-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13215-1

Keywords

Navigation