A no-reference quality assessment for contrast-distorted image based on improved learning method | Multimedia Tools and Applications Skip to main content
Log in

A no-reference quality assessment for contrast-distorted image based on improved learning method

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

No-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA), which aims to predict image quality without accessing to reference images, is a fundamental and challenging problem in the field of image processing. Nevertheless, there are few researches about contrast-distorted images and results of the existing NR-IQA methods which cannot be in accordance with the subjective assessment results further. Therefore, an effective NR-IQA method for contrast-distorted image is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the proposed method extracts five features of all images from the database based on the natural scene statistics (NSS) model. Then the curve fitting method is subsequently represented to calculate values of natural image features. Finally, an improved Support Vector Regression (SVR) learning method based on grid search is proposed to establish the mapping between image feature values and the quality score of a test image. Experiments proved that the proposed method is effective when compared with other related state-of-the-art image quality assessment (IQA) methods based on three standard databases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. [Online]. Available: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm/

  2. Amiri SA, Hassanpour H, Marouzi OR (2017) No-reference image quality assessment based on local-ized discrete cosine transform for JPEG compressed images. Multimedia Tools and Applications, pp 1–17

  3. Attar A, Shahbahrami A, Rad RM (2016) Image quality assessment using edge based features. Multimed Tools Appl 75(12):7407–7422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Babu RV, Suresh S, Perkis A (2007) No-reference JPEG-image quality assessment using GAP-RBF. Signal Process 87(6):1493–1503

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang DC, Wu WR (1998) Image contrast enhancement based on a histogram transformation of local standard deviation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17(4):518–531

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen C, Bloom JA (2011) A universal reference-free blurriness measure. Proc SPIE - The Int Soc Opt Eng 7867(13):1216–1217

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen MJ, Cormack LK, Bovik AC (2013) No-Reference Quality assessment of natural stereopairs. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(9):3379–3391

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang Y, Ma K, Wang Z, Lin W, Fang Z, Zhai G (2014) No-Reference Quality assessment of Contrast-Distorted images based on natural scene statistics. IEEE Trans Signal Process Lett 22(7):838–842

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gao F, Tao D, Gao X, Li X (2015) Learning to rank for blind image quality assessment. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 26(10):2275–2290

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2008) Image enhancement in the spatial domain, in digital image processing, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gu K, Zhai G, Yang X, et al. (2013) Subjective and objective quality assessment for images with contrast change. In: 2013 20th IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP). IEEE, pp 383–387

  12. Gu K, Zhai G, Yang X, Zhang W (2015) Using free energy principle for blind image quality assessment. IEEE Trans Multimedia 17(1):50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ibrahim H, Kong NSP (2007) Brightness preserving dynamic histogram equalization for image contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 53 (4):1752–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Larson EC, Chandler DM (2010) Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy[J]. J Electron Imag 19(1):011006.01–011006.24

    Google Scholar 

  15. Larson EC, Chandler DM Categorical image quality (CSIQ) database [Online]. Available: http://vision.okstate.edu/csiq

  16. Liang L, Wang S, Chen J, Chen J, Ma S, Zhao D, Gao W (2010) No-reference perceptual image quality metric using gradient profiles for JPEG2000. Signal Process Image Commun 25(7):502–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin W, Kuo CJ (2011) Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey. J Vis Commun Image Represent 22(4):297–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu L, Liu B, Huang H, Bovik AC (2014) No-reference image quality assessment based on spatial and spectral entropies. Signal Process Image Commun 29 (8):856–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mittal A, Moorthy AK, Bovik AC (2012) No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Trans Image Process A: Publ IEEE Signal Process Soc 21 (12):4695

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Mittal A, Soundararajan R, Bovik AC (2013) Making a completely blind image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal Process Lett 20(3):209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morrow WM, Paranjape RB, Rangayyan RM, Desautels JL (1992) Region-based contrast enhancement of mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 11 (3):392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Motoyoshi I, Nishida S, Sharan L, Adelson EH (2007) Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature 447:206–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nadenau MJ, Reichel J, Kunt M (2003) Wavelet-based color image compression: exploiting the contrast sensitivity function. IEEE Trans Image Process A: Publ IEEE Signal Process Soc 12(1):58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Omari M, Hassouni ME, Abdelouahad AA, Cherifi H (2015) A statistical reduced-reference method for color image quality assessment. Multimed Tools Appl 74 (19):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ponomarenko N, Ieremeiev O, Lukin V, Egiazarian K, Jin L, Astola J, Vozel B, Chehdi K, Carli M, Battisti F, Jay Kuo C-C (2013) Color image database TID2013: peculiarities, and preliminary results. In: Proceedings of the 4th European workshop on visual information processing, pp 106–111

  26. Rezaie F, Helfroush MS, Danyali H (2017) No-reference image quality assessment using local binary pattern in the wavelet domain. Multimedia Tools and Applications, pp 1–13

  27. Oszust M (2017) Image quality assessment with lasso regression and pairwise score differences. Multimedia Tools and Applications, pp 1–16

  28. Shahid M, Rossholm A, Lovstrom B, Zepernick HJ (2014) No-reference image and video quality assessment: a classification and review of recent approaches. Eurasip J Image Video Process 2014(1): 1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shi J, Yao J, Yu H, Yun L (2007) Measurement of luminance contrast sensitivity function of human visual system on cathode ray tube display. Acta Optica Sinica 27(4):744–748

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tolambiya A, Kalra PK, Zhai Contrast sensitive epsilon-SVR and its application in image compression. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, vol 66. IEEE, pp 359–364

  31. Wang Z, Bovik A, Sheikh H, Simoncelli E (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Z, Bovik AC (2006) Modern image quality assessment, video and multimedia processing. Morgan and Claypool, San Mateo

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wu J, Lin W, Shi G, Liu A (2013) Reduced-reference image quality assessment with visual information delity. IEEE Trans Multimedia 15(7):1700–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu X (2011) A linear programming approach for optimal contrast-tone mapping. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(5):1262–1272

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Xiao J, Hays J, Ehinger K, Oliva A, Torralba A (2010) SUN database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo. IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit 23(3):3485–3492

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang L, Zhang L, Bovik AC (2015) A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator. IEEE Trans Image Process 24(8):2579–2591

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhu X, Milanfar P (2009) A no-reference sharpness metric sensitive to blur and noise. In: International workshop on quality of multimedia experience. IEEE, pp 64–69

  38. Zong X, Laine AF, Geiser EA (1998) Speckle reduction and contrast enhancement of echocardiograms via multiscale nonlinear processing. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17(4):532–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zoran D, Weiss Y (2009) Scalein variance and noise in natural images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, vol 30, no 2, pp 2209–2216

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Yang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61502007, 61572452, in part by the Natural Science Research Project of Anhui province under Grant 1608085MF125, in part by the NO.58 China Post-doctoral Science Foundation under Grant 2015M582015, in part by the Backbone Teacher Training Programof Anhui University, in part by the Doctoral Scientific Re-search Foundation of Anhui University under Grant J01001319.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Y., Zhu, Y., Yang, Y. et al. A no-reference quality assessment for contrast-distorted image based on improved learning method. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 10057–10076 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6524-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6524-1

Keywords

Navigation