Hierarchical multi-classifier system design based on evolutionary computation technique | Multimedia Tools and Applications Skip to main content
Log in

Hierarchical multi-classifier system design based on evolutionary computation technique

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Histogram feature representation is important in many classification applications for characterization of the statistical distribution of different pattern attributes, such as the color and edge orientation distribution in images. While the construction of these feature representations is simple, this very simplicity may compromise the classification accuracy in those cases where the original histogram does not provide adequate discriminative information for making a reliable classification. In view of this, we propose an optimization approach based on evolutionary computation (Back, Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996; Fogel, Evolutionary computation: toward a new philosophy of machine intelligence, 2nd edn. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ 1998) to identify a suitable transformation on the histogram feature representation, such that the resulting classification performance based on these features is maximally improved while the original simplicity of the representation is retained. To facilitate this optimization process, we propose a hierarchical classifier structure to demarcate the set of categories in such a way that the pair of category subsets with the highest level of dissimilarities is identified at each stage for partition. In this way, the evolutionary search process for the required transformation can be considerably simplified due to the reduced level of complexities in classification for two widely separated category subsets. The proposed approach is applied to two problems in multimedia data classification, namely the categorization of 3D computer graphics models and image classification in the JPEG compressed domain. Experimental results indicate that the evolutionary optimization approach, facilitated by the hierarchical classification process, is capable of significantly improving the classification performance for both applications based on the transformed histogram representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ankerst M, Kastenmuller G, Kriegel HP, Seidl T (1999) 3D shape histograms for similarity search and classification in spatial databases. Proc. 6th Int. Symposium on Large Spatial Databases (SSD’99), Hong Kong, China, pp 207–226

  2. Ankerst M, Kastenmuller G, Kriegel HP, Seidl T (1999) Nearest neighbor classification in 3D protein databases. Proc. 7th intl. conf. on intelligent systems for molecular biology, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 34–43

  3. Back T (1996) Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey A, Harris CJ (1999) Using hierarchical classification to exploit context in pattern classification for information fusion, Proc. of proceedings of 2nd intl. conf. on information fusion, 1196–1203

  5. Basri R, Weinshall D (1996) Distance medtric between 3D models and 2D images for recognition and classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 18(4):465–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fogel DB (1998) Evolutionary computation: toward a new philosophy of machine intelligence, 2nd edn. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ

  7. Funkhouser T, Min P, Kazhdan M, Chen J, Halderman A, Dobkin D (2003) A search engine for 3D models. ACM Trans Graph 21(3):83–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Furht B (1995) A survey of multimedia compression techniques and standards. Real-Time Imaging 1:49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hilaga M, Shinagawa Y, Kohmura T, Kunii T (2001) Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3D shapes. Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH ’01, Log Angeles, USA, pp. 203–212, Aug

  11. Horn BKP (1984) Extended gaussian images. Proc IEEE 72(12):1671–1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ip HHS, Wong WYF (2002) 3D head models retrieval based on hierarchical facial region similarity. 15th Vision Interface, Calgary, Canada, pp 314–319, May

  13. Kim B, Landgrebe DA (1991) Hierarchical classifier design in high dimensional numerous class cases. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 29(4):518–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Landeweerd G, Timmers T, Gelsema E, Bins M, Halic M (1983) Binary tree versus single level tree classification of white blood cells. Pattern Recogn 16(6):571–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lau RWH, Wong B (2002) Web-based 3D geometry model retrieval. World Wide Web: Internet and Web Information Systems 5:193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lay JA, Guan L (1999) Image retrieval based on energy histograms of the low frequency DCT coefficients. In: Proc IEEE int conf on acoustics, Speeck and Singnal Proc, pp 3009–3012

  17. Mandal MK, Idris F, Panchanathan S (1999) A critical evaluation of image and video indexing techniques in the compressed domain. Image Vis Comput 17(7):513–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MPI Faces Database (2004) Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, available online at http://faces.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/

  19. Paquet E, Rioux M, Murching A, Naveen T, Tabatabai A (2000) Description of shape information for 2-D and 3-D objects. Signal Process Image Commun 16:103–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pennebaker WB, Mitchell JL (1993) JPEG still image compression standard. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rounds E (1980) A combined non-parametric aproach to feature selection and binary decision tree design. Pattern Recogn 12(5):313–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Safavian SR, Landgrebe D (1991) A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 21(3):660–674

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Vranic DV, Saupe D, Richter J (2001) Tools for 3D-object retrieval: karhunen-loeve transform and spherical harmonics. Proc. IEEE 2001 workshop multimedia signal processing, Cannes, France, pp. 293–298, Oct

  24. Wu C, Landgrebe D, Swain P (1975) The decision tree approach to classification. Technical Report RE-EE 75-17, School Elec. Eng., Purdue University, Lafayette, IN

  25. Yoon Y, Lee C, Lee GG (2004) Systematic construction of hierarchical classificatier in SVM-based text categorization, accepted for Proc. 1st intl. joint conf. on natural language processing, Sanya City, Hainan, China

  26. You KC, Fu KS (1976) An approach to the design of a linear binary tree classifier. Proc. 3rd symp. machine processing of remotely sensed data, Purdue University

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hau-San Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, HS., Cheung, K.K.T., Chiu, CI. et al. Hierarchical multi-classifier system design based on evolutionary computation technique. Multimed Tools Appl 33, 91–108 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-006-0098-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-006-0098-z

Keywords

Navigation