Abstract
Consumer robots are predicted to be employed in a variety of customer-facing situations. As these robots are designed to look and behave like humans, consumers attribute human traits to them—a phenomenon known as the “Eliza Effect.” In four experiments, we show that the anthropomorphism of a consumer robot increases psychological warmth but decreases attitudes, due to uncanniness. Competence judgments are much less affected and not subject to a decrease in attitudes. The current research contributes to research on artificial intelligence, anthropomorphism, and the uncanny valley phenomenon. We suggest to managers that they need to make sure that the appearances and behaviors of robots are not too human-like to avoid negative attitudes toward robots. Moreover, managers and researchers should collaborate to determine the optimal level of anthropomorphism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Aaker, J. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–356.
Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 468–479.
Bates, J. (1994). The role of emotion in believable agents. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 122–125.
Delbaere, M., McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J. (2011). Personification in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 121–130.
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2018). Overcoming algorithm aversion: people will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Management Science, 64(3), 1155–1170.
DiSalvo, C., & Gemperle, F. (2003). From seduction to fulfillment: the use of anthropomorphic form in design. In B. Hanington & J. Forlizzi (Eds.), Proceedings of the designing pleasurable products and interfaces conference (pp. 67–72). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon.
Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 177–190.
Ekbia, H. R. (2008). Artificial dreams: the quest for non-biological intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Epley, N. (2018). A mind like mine: the exceptionally ordinary underpinnings of anthropomorphism. Journal of the Association of Consumer Research, 3(4), 591–598.
Epley, N., & Waytz, A. (2010). Mind perception. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 498–541). New York: Wiley.
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83.
Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2012). Feeling robots and human zombies: mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition, 125(1), 125–130.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. White Paper, http://www.afhayes.com/introduction-to-mediation-moderationand-conditional-process-analysis.html#process. Accessed 7 Dec 2017.
Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 899–913.
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 163–204.
Kiesler, S., & Goetz, J. (2002). Mental models and cooperation with robotic assistants. In Proceedings of CHI’02 on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 576–577). Minneapolis: ACM Press.
Kim, S., Chen Peng, R., & Zhang, K. (2016). Anthropomorphized helpers undermine autonomy and enjoyment in computer games. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(2), 282–302.
Kervyn, N., Fiske, S., & Malone, C. (2012). Brands as intentional agents framework: how perceived intentions and ability can map brand perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 166–176.
Langner, T., Bruns, D., Fischer, A., & Rossiter, J. R. (2016). Falling in love with brands: a dynamic analysis of the trajectories of brand love. Marketing Letters, 27(1), 15–26.
MacDorman, K. F., & Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7, 297–337.
MacInnis, D. J., & Folkes, V. S. (2017). Humanizing brands: when brands seem to be like me, part of me, and in a relationship with me. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(3), 355–374.
Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33–35.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574–583.
Nowak, K. L., & Rauh, C. (2008). Choose your “buddy icon” carefully: the influence of avatar androgyny, anthropomorphism and credibility in online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1473–1493.
Phillips, E., Zhao, X., Ullman, D., & Malle, B. F. (2018). What is human-like?: decomposing robot human-like appearance using the Anthropomorphic roBOT (ABOT) Database. Human Robot Interactions '18, https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171268.
Touré-Tillery, M., & McGill, A. L. (2015). Who or what to believe: trust and the differential persuasiveness of human and anthropomorphized messengers. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 94–110.
Van Doorn, J., Mende, M., Noble, S. M., Hulland, J., Ostrom, A. L., Grewal, D., & Petersen, J. A. (2017). Domo arigato Mr. Roboto: emergence of automated social presence in organizational frontlines and customers’ service experiences. Journal of Service Research, 20(1), 43–58.
Wang, S., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Rochat, P. (2015). The uncanny valley: existence and explanations. Review of General Psychology, 19(4), 393–407.
Wojciszke, B., Abele, A. E., & Baryla, W. (2009). Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 973–990.
Wortman, J., & Wood, D. (2011). The personality traits of liked people. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(6), 519–528.
Yogeeswaran, K., Złotowski, J., Livingstone, M., Bartneck, C., Sumioka, H., & Ishiguro, H. (2016). The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 5(2), 29–47.
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Kervyn, N., & Judd, C. M. (2008). Compensation versus halo: the unique relations between the fundamental dimensions of social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1110–1123.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, S.Y., Schmitt, B.H. & Thalmann, N.M. Eliza in the uncanny valley: anthropomorphizing consumer robots increases their perceived warmth but decreases liking. Mark Lett 30, 1–12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-019-09485-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-019-09485-9