Abstract
The mechanism of axonal conduction block induced by ultra-high frequency (≥20 kHz) biphasic electrical current was investigated using a lumped circuit model of the amphibian myelinated axon based on Frankenhaeuser-Huxley (FH) equations. The ultra-high frequency stimulation produces constant activation of both sodium and potassium channels at the axonal node under the block electrode causing the axonal conduction block. This blocking mechanism is different from the mechanism when the stimulation frequency is between 4 kHz and 10 kHz, where only the potassium channel is constantly activated. The minimal stimulation intensity required to induce a conduction block increases as the stimulation frequency increases. The results from this simulation study are useful to guide future animal experiments to reveal the different mechanisms underlying nerve conduction block induced by high-frequency biphasic electrical current.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c816d/c816da53c1b9d7363088152939d54e749cbb3d0b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21928/21928b718053ba01a72719548711ef71b7aa381b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/777aa/777aab7b06fccffb550ec554d3ef4b76b5890c12" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/954da/954da0f31b90ca189130cfa5113ec94f7d9d4642" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9bce/b9bceb271779fffabdde994a0ba1720c6386c12a" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnew, W. F., & McCreery, D. H. (1990). Neural prostheses: Fundamental studies. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Bhadra, N., & Kilgore, K. (2005). High-frequency electrical conduction block of mammalian peripheral motor nerve. Muscle Nerve, 32, 782–790.
Bhadra, N., Lahowetz, E., Foldes, S., & Kilgore, K. (2007). Simulation of high-frequency sinusoidal electrical block of mammalian myelinated axons. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 22, 313–326.
Bikson, M., Lian, J., Hahn, P., Stacey, W., Sciortino, C., & Durand, D. (2001). Suppression of epileptiform activity by high frequency sinusoidal fields in rat hippocampal slices. Journal of Physiology, 531, 181–191.
Bowman, B., & McNeal, D. (1986). Response of single alpha motoneurons to high frequency pulse train: firing behavior and conduction block phenomenon. Applied Neurophysiology, 49, 121–138.
Boyce, W. E., & Diprima, R. C. (1997). Elementary differential equations and boundary value problems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 6th ed., pp. 436–457.
Bromm, B. (1975). Spike frequency of the nodal membrane generated by high-frequency alternating current. Pfluger Archive, 353, 1–19.
Chiu, S. Y., Ritchie, J. M., Rogart, R. B., & Stagg, D. (1979). A quantitative description of membrane currents in rabbit myelinated nerve. Journal of Physiology (London), 292, 149–166.
Frankenhaeuser, B., & Huxley, A. F. (1964). The action potential in the myelinated nerve fibre of Xenopus Laevis as computed on the basis of voltage clamp data. Journal of Physiology (London), 171, 302–315.
Gerges, M., Foldes, E. L., Ackermann, D. M., Bhadra, N., Bhadra, N., & Kilgore, K. L. (2010). Frequency- and amplitude-transitioned waveforms mitigate the onset response in high-frequency nerve block. Journal of Neural Engineering, 7.
Graunt, R. A., & Prochazka, A. (2009). Transcutaneously coupled, high-frequency electrical stimulation of the pudendal nerve blocks external urethral sphincter contractions. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 615–626.
Hodgkin, A. L., & Huxley, A. F. (1952). A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. Journal of Physiology (London), 117, 500–544.
Jensen, A., & Durand, D. (2007). Suppression of axonal conduction by sinusoidal stimulation in rat hippocampus in vitro. Journal of Neural Engineering, 4, 1–16.
Joseph, L., & Butera, R. (2009). Unmyelinated aplysia nerves exhibit a nonmonotonic blocking response to high-frequency stimulation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 17, 537–544.
Leob, G. E. (1989). Neural prosthetic interfaces with the nervous system. Trends in Neurosciences, 12, 195–201.
Lian, J., Bikson, M., Sciortino, C., Stacey, W., & Durand, D. (2003). Local suppression of epileptiform activity by electrical stimulation in rat hippocampus in vitro. Journal of Physiology, 547, 427–434.
Liu, H., Roppolo, J. R., de Groat, W. C., & Tai, C. (2009). The role of slow potassium current in nerve conduction block induced by high-frequency biphasic electrical current. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 56, 137–146.
Nashold, B. S., Goldner, J. L., Mullen, J. B., & Bright, D. S. (1982). Long-term pain control by direct peripheral-nerve stimulation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 64A, 1–10.
Rattay, F., & Aberham, M. (1993). Modeling axon membranes for functional electrical stimulation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 40, 1201–1209.
Reboul, J., & Rosenblueth, A. (1939). The action of alternating currents upon the electrical excitability of nerve. American Journal of Physiology, 125, 205–215.
Rosenblueth, A., & Reboul, J. (1939). The blocking and deblocking effects of alternating currents on nerve. American Journal of Physiology, 125, 251–264.
Roth, B. J. (1994). Mechanisms for electrical stimulation of excitable tissue. Critical Review on Biomedical Engineering, 22, 253–305.
Schwarz, J. R., & Eikhof, G. (1987). Na currents and action potentials in rat myelinated nerve fibres at 20 and 37°C. Pflugers Archive., 409, 569–577.
Schwarz, J. R., Reid, G., & Bostock, H. (1995). Action potentials and membrane currents in the human node of Ranvier. Pflugers Archive, 430, 283–292.
Tai, C., Roppolo, J. R., & de Groat, W. C. (2004). Block of external urethral sphincter contraction by high frequency electrical stimulation of pudendal nerve. Journal of Urology, 172, 2069–2072.
Tai, C., de Groat, W. C., & Roppolo, J. R. (2005a). Simulation analysis of conduction block in unmyelinated axons induced by high-frequency biphasic electrical currents. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 52, 1323–1332.
Tai, C., de Groat, W. C., & Roppolo, J. R. (2005b). Simulation of nerve block by high-frequency sinusoidal electrical current based on the Hodgkin-Huxley model. IEEE Transactions on Neural System and Rehabilitation Engineering, 13, 415–422.
Tai, C., Roppolo, J. R., & de Groat, W. C. (2005c). Response of external urethral sphincter to high frequency biphasic electrical stimulation of pudendal nerve. Journal of Urology, 174, 782–786.
Tai, C., Wang, J., Chancellor, M. B., Roppolo, J. R., & de Groat, W. C. (2008). Influence of temperature on pudendal nerve block induced by high frequency biphasic electrical current. Journal of Urology, 180, 1173–1178.
Tanner, T. (1962). Reversible blocking of nerve conduction by alternating-current excitation. Nature, 195, 712–713.
Wang, J., Shen, B., Roppolo, J. R., de Groat, W. C., & Tai, C. (2008). Influence of frequency and temperature on the mechanisms of nerve conduction block induced by high-frequency biphasic electrical current. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 24, 195–206.
Williamson, R., & Andrews, B. (2005). Localized electrical nerve blocking. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 52, 362–370.
Zhang, X., Roppolo, J. R., de Groat, W. C., & Tai, C. (2006a). Simulation analysis of conduction block in myelinated axons induced by high-frequency biphasic rectangular pulses. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 53, 1433–1436.
Zhang, X., Roppolo, J. R., de Groat, W. C., & Tai, C. (2006b). Mechanism of nerve conduction block induced by high-frequency biphasic electrical currents. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 53, 2445–2454.
Acknowledgement
This work is supported by the NIH under grants DK-068566, DK-090006, DK-077783, and by Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Action Editor: Gaute T Einevoll
Appendix
Appendix
The ionic current I i,j at jth node is described as:
where P Na (0.008 cm/s), P K (0.0012 cm/s) and P P (0.00054 cm/s) are the ionic permeabilities for sodium, potassium and nonspecific currents respectively; \( {g_L} \) (30.3 kΩ−1 cm−2) is the maximum conductance for leakage current. VL (0.026 mV) is reduced equilibrium membrane potential for leakage ions, in which the resting membrane potential \( {V_{{rest}}} \) (−70 mV) has been subtracted. [Na]i (13.7 mmole/l) and [Na]o (114.5 mmole/l) are sodium concentrations inside and outside the axon membrane. [K]i (120 mmole/l) and [K]o (2.5 mmole/l) are potassium concentrations inside and outside the axon membrane. F (96,485 c/mole) is Faraday constant. R (8314.4 mJ/K/mole) is gas constant. m, h, n and p are dimensionless variables, whose values always change between 0 and 1. m and h represent activation and inactivation of sodium channels, whereas n represents activation of potassium channels. p represents activation of non-specific ion channels. The evolution equations for m, h, n and p are the following:
and
where T is the temperature in °Kelvin. The initial values for m, h, n and p (when Vj = 0 mV) are 0.0005, 0.0268, 0.8249 and 0.0049 respectively.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tai, C., Guo, D., Wang, J. et al. Mechanism of conduction block in amphibian myelinated axon induced by biphasic electrical current at ultra-high frequency. J Comput Neurosci 31, 615–623 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-011-0329-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-011-0329-9