Abstract
By the advantages of small size, low cost and easy deployment, passive Ultra High Frequency Radio Frequency Identification (UHF RFID) technology has become one of the most popular indoor localization technologies. As the most common measurement information, Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) is severely affected by the complex indoor environments, like multipath propagation, Non-Line-of-Sight propagation, noise, etc. It eventually reduces location estimation accuracy. To improve the accuracy of RSSI-based algorithms, pattern matching algorithms are utilized with extra reference tags at fixed and known locations. One of the typical pattern matching algorithms is k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) algorithm. There is a problem for pattern matching algorithms utilized into real applications. That is the usually utilized RFID antenna is directional in industries while the algorithms are tested with omnidirectional antennas in experimental tests during research. In this paper, we take k-NN as an example to further analyze the performance difference between these two kinds of antennas. Experimental results show that the localization performance of k-NN algorithms with directional antennas utilized is worse than the results with omnidirectional antennas. But the performance is no significant difference.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92f61/92f61e4ecc64c6c3041b7d2b8801bb78305cddb4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db7a3/db7a3025c7fa73230f7024c23a92164aca214e10" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6da2a/6da2a8b1c8381dd280f175dfa896b3a09a38a18b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/943e2/943e289e15a07f8cbea2cbe49b2af327636784a8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8293e/8293e08c0da5489febbfbe5bd45d11e9fcfd5f37" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c545/3c545f7069da8135b286dd635a7d7b64e74896ad" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eab8b/eab8b0c31fd10fdee8ae37b7be458ae2f64234b8" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bellavista P, Kupper A, Helal S. Location-based services: back to the future. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 2008,7(2): 85–89.
Junglas IA, Watson RT. Location-based services. Communications of the ACM, 2008, 51(3): 65–69.
Pahlavan K, Li X, Makela JP. Indoor geolocation science and technology. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2002, 40(2): 112–118.
Otsason V, Varshavsky A, LaMarca A, et al. Accurate GSM indoor localization. International conference on ubiquitous computing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005: 141–158
Gezici S, Tian Z, Giannakis GB, et al. Localization via ultra-wideband radios: a look at positioning aspects for future sensor networks. IEEE signal processing magazine, 2005, 22(4): 70–84.
Bahl P, Padmanabhan V N. RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. INFOCOM 2000. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE. 2000, 2: 775–784.
Youssef MA, Agrawala A, Shankar AU. WLAN location determination via clustering and probability distributions. Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2003.(PerCom 2003). Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2003: 143–150.
Kotanen A, Hannikainen M, Leppakoski H, et al. Experiments on local positioning with Bluetooth. Information Technology: Coding and Computing [Computers and Communications], 2003. Proceedings. ITCC 2003. International Conference on. IEEE, 2003: 297–303.
DiGiampaolo E, Martinelli F. Mobile robot localization using the phase of passive UHF RFID signals. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2014, 61(1): 365–376.
Nikitin PV, Martinez R, Ramamurthy S, et al. Phase based spatial identification of UHF RFID tags. 2010 IEEE International Conference on RFID (IEEE RFID 2010). IEEE, 2010: 102–109.
Ma Y, Zhou L, Liu K, et al. Iterative phase reconstruction and weighted localization algorithm for indoor RFID-based localization in NLOS environment. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2014, 14(2): 597–611.
Zhang Z, Lu Z, Saakian V, et al. Item-level indoor localization with passive UHF RFID based on tag interaction analysis. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2014, 61(4): 2122–2135.
Ni LM, Liu Y, Lau YC, et al. LANDMARC: indoor location sensing using active RFID. Wireless networks, 2004, 10(6): 701–710.
Yang L, Chen Y, Li XY, et al. Tagoram: Real-time tracking of mobile RFID tags to high precision using COTS devices. Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 2014: 237–248.
Liu T, Yang L, Lin Q, et al. Anchor-free backscatter positioning for rfid tags with high accuracy. IEEE INFOCOM 2014-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 2014: 379–387.
Griffin JD, Durgin GD. Complete link budgets for backscatter-radio and RFID systems. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 2009, 51(2): 11–25.
Arnitz D, Muehlmann U, Witrisal K. Characterization and modeling of UHF RFID channels for ranging and localization. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2012, 60(5): 2491–2501.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology under Grant 15JCQNJC41900 and in part by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61401301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, Y., Gao, Z., Ma, Y. et al. Localization Performance Analysis for Passive UHF RFID Technology Employing Directional Antennas and Omnidirectional Antennas. Int J Wireless Inf Networks 24, 50–55 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-016-0328-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-016-0328-x