Analysis of the velocity field in a large rectangular channel with lateral shockwave | Environmental Fluid Mechanics Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the velocity field in a large rectangular channel with lateral shockwave

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work the authors describe the main characteristics of the velocity field of hydraulic jumps in a very large channel where lateral shockwaves occur. Experiments were carried out at the Coastal Engineering Laboratory of the Water Engineering and Chemistry Department of the Technical University of Bari (Italy). Extensive flow velocity measurements were investigated in order to have a clearer understanding of both hydraulic jump development and lateral shockwave formation in a very large channel. Eight experiments were performed in a 4m wide rectangular channel; the experiments differed in the inlet Froude number F 0 and the jump type. Seven tests were carried out with undular jumps and one with a roller jump. The flow velocity and the flow free surface measurements were taken using a two-dimensional Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) and an ultrasonic profiler, respectively. The experimental results can be summarized as follow: (i) the formation of well developed lateral shockwaves similar to those of oblique jumps were observed; (ii) the comparison of the experimental and theoretical data shows that the classic shockwave theory is sufficiently confirmed in the analyzed range of Reynolds number, taking into account the experimental errors and the difference between the theoretical and experimental assumptions; (iii) the transversal flow velocity profiles in the recirculating zone show a good agreement with the numerical simulations presented in literature in the case of a separated turbulent boundary layer over a flat plate. This conclusion enables us to confirm the hypothesis that the lateral shockwaves in the channel are the result of a boundary layer which, as observed, forms on the channel sidewalls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

β :

Angle between the lateral shockwave and the channel side wall (°)

θ :

Angle between the horizontal velocity component and the channel side wall (°)

λ:

Minimum distance from the upstream gate in order to have flow development (m)

ν:

Water kinematic viscosity (m2 s−1)

δ * :

Displacement thickness of the lateral boundary layer (m)

ψ :

Streamline function (m2 s−1)

AR:

Jump aspect ratio = B/h 0(−)

B :

Channel width (m)

bj :

length of the hydraulic jump front normal to the upstream current (m)

F 0 :

Froude number at the vena contracta (−)

F 1 :

Local Froude number (−)

g :

Gravity acceleration (ms−2)

h g :

Opening of sluice gate (m)

h 0 :

Flow depth at the vena contracta (m)

h1, h2:

Local flow depth (subscript 1 for supercritical flow, 2 for subcritical flow) (m)

L :

longitudinal length from the upstream channel gate to the hydraulic jump front normal to the upstream current (m)

l :

longitudinal distance from the upstream channel gate to the toe of the shockwave (m)

Q :

Flow discharge (m3 s−1)

Re:

= Q/(Bν) = Channel flow Reynolds number (−)

Re x :

= U c x/ν = local Reynolds number (−)

T:

Water temperature (°C)

U 0 :

Channel flow velocity at the vena contracta (ms−1)

U c :

Channel flow velocity at a distance equal to l/2 from the upstream gate (ms−1)

U x :

Streamwise (longitudinal) velocity (ms−1)

U y :

Wall-normal velocity (ms−1)

Vn1, Vn2:

Horizontal velocity component normal to the shockwave front (subscript 1 for supercritical flow, 2 for subcritical flow) (ms−1)

Vt1, Vt2:

Horizontal velocity component tangential to the shockwave front (subscript 1 for supercritical flow, 2 for subcritical flow) (ms−1)

x :

Longitudinal coordinates from the upstream channel gate (m)

y :

Distance from the wall (m)

References

  1. Ben Meftah M, De Serio F, Mossa M, Pollio A (2006) Undular jump formation in very large channel. In: Proceedings of IDRA 2006, Italian conference of hydraulics and hydraulic construction, Roma, 10–15 September

  2. Carling PA (1995). Flow-separation berms downstream of a hydraulic jump in a bedrock channel. Geomorphology 11: 245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chanson H and Montes JS (1995). Characteristics of undular hydraulic jumps: experimental apparatus and flow patters. J Hydraul Eng 121(2): 129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chow VT (1959). Open channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ippen AT (1951). Mechanics of supercritical flow. Transactions ASCE 116: 268–295

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ippen AT and Harleman DRF (1956). Verification of theory for oblique standing waves. Transactions ASCE 121: 268–297

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leutheusser HJ and Alemu S (1979). Flow separation under hydraulic jump. J Hydraul Res 17(3): 193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Montes JS and Chanson H (1998). Characteristics of undular hydraulic jumps: experiments and analysis. J Hydraul Eng 124(2): 192–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Na Y and Moin P (1998). Direct numerical simulation of a separated turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 374: 379–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohtsu I, Yasuda Y and Gotoh H (1997). Discussion of Characteristics of undular hydraulic jumps: experimental apparatus and flow patterns by Chanson H and Montes JS (Paper 7859). J Hydraul Eng 123(2): 161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohtsu I, Yasuda Y and Gotoh H (2001). Hydraulic condition for undular-jump formations. J Hydraul Res 39(2): 203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohtsu I, Yasuda Y and Gotoh H (2003). Flow conditions of undular hydraulic jumps in horizontal rectangular channels. J Hydraul Eng 129(12): 948–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perry AE and Fairlie BD (1975). A study of turbulent boundary-layer separation and reattachments. J Fluid Mech 69: 657–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reinauer R and Hager WH (1995). Non-breaking undular hydraulic jumps. J Hydraul Res 33(5): 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rouse H, Bhoota V and Hsu EY (1951). Design of channel expansion. Transactions ASCE 121: 347–363

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schlichting H (1979). Boundary layer theory, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shiloh K, Shivaprasad BG and Simpson RL (1981). The structure of a separating turbulent layer. Part 3. Transverse velocity measurements. J Fluid Mech 113: 75–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Simpson RL, Strickland JH and Barr PW (1977). Features of a separating turbulent boundary layer in the vicinity of a separation. J Fluid Mech 79: 553–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Simpson RL, Chew YT and Shivaprasad BG (1981). The structure of a separating turbulent boundary layer. Part 1. Mean flow and Reynolds stresses. J Fluid Mech 113: 23–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson RL, Chew YT and Shivaprasad BG (1981). The structure of a separating turbulent boundary layer. Part 2. Higher-order turbulence results. J Fluid Mech 113: 53–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Mossa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben Meftah, M., De Serio, F., Mossa, M. et al. Analysis of the velocity field in a large rectangular channel with lateral shockwave. Environ Fluid Mech 7, 519–536 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-007-9034-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-007-9034-7

Keywords