Individual knowledge management engagement, knowledge-worker productivity, and innovation performance in knowledge-based organizations: the implications for knowledge processes and knowledge-based systems | Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Individual knowledge management engagement, knowledge-worker productivity, and innovation performance in knowledge-based organizations: the implications for knowledge processes and knowledge-based systems

  • S.I. : CMKBO
  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature on the knowledge management relatively ignores an important concept, the individual knowledge management engagement-the degree to which a knowledge worker is involved with the knowledge management-related activities. This concept is imperative for nurturing the productivity of knowledge workers, knowledge management architecture effectiveness, and innovation. Therefore, this study proposes the mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity between individual knowledge management engagement and innovation. The data were collected from the 330 knowledge workers of IT sector of Pakistan and analyzed using the SmartPLS 3 Version 2.6. The results indicate the partial mediation of knowledge-worker productivity between the individual knowledge management engagement and innovation. The results suggest the pivotal role of individual knowledge management engagement in increasing the innovation and knowledge-worker productivity in the knowledge-based organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Allen J, James AD, Gamlen P (2007) Formal versus informal knowledge networks in R&D: a case study using social network analysis. R&D Manag 37(3):179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreeva T, Kianto A (2011) Knowledge processes, knowledge-intensity and innovation: a moderated mediation analysis. J Knowl Manag 15(6):1016–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Market Sci 16(1):74–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch-Sijtsema PM, Ruohomäki V, Vartiainen M (2009) Knowledge work productivity in distributed teams. J Knowl Manag 13(6):533–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera A, Collins WC, Salgado JF (2006) Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. Int J Hum Resour Manag 17(2):245–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Alexander J, Ioannidis A (2000) Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government–university–industry (GUI) R&D partnerships in the US, Germany, and France. Technovation 20(9):477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinal LB, Alessandri TM, Turner SF (2001) Knowledge modifiability, resources, and science-based innovation. J knowl Manag 5(2):195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa V, Monteiro S (2016) Key knowledge management processes for innovation: a systematic literature review. VINE J Inf Knowl Manag Syst 46(3):386–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curado C, Bontis N (2006) The knowledge-based view of the firm and its theoretical precursor. Int J Learn Intellect Cap 3(4):367–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahooie JH, Afrazeh A, Hosseini SMM (2011) An activity-based framework for quantification of knowledge work. J Knowl Manag 15(3):422–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darroch J, McNaughton R (2002) Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation. J Intellect Cap 3(3):210–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David FR (2007) Strategic management: concepts and cases. Pearson Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (1998) Management’s new paradigms. Forbes Mag 10:98

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (1999) Knowledge-worker productivity: the biggest challenge. Calif Manag Rev 41(2):79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis M (2007) The role of knowledge management in innovation. J Knowl Manag 11(4):20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert P, Freibichler W (2017) Nudge management: applying behavioural science to increase knowledge worker productivity. J Org Des 6(1):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez R (2013) The factors determining knowledge worker productivity within the Irish IT Industry (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin Business School). http://esource.dbs.ie/handle/10788/1753

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res 18(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrido-Moreno A, Lockett N, Garcia-Morales V (2015) Exploring the role of knowledge management practices in fostering customer relationship management as a catalyst of marketing innovation. Balt J Manag 10(4):393–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold AH, Malhotra A, Segras AH (2001) Knowledge management: an organisational capabilities perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 18(1):185–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez CM (2007) Knowledge management and employee productivity, (Master Thesis, San Jose State University). http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/3377. Accessed 06 Aug 2017

  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(S2):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas MR, Hansen MT (2007) Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strateg Manag J 28(11):1133–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. J Acad Market Sci 43(1):115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honarpour A, Jusoh A, Nor KM (2017) Total quality management, knowledge management, and innovation: an empirical study in R&D units. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1238760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain S, Shujahat M, Malik MI, Iqbal S, Nawaz FN (2017) Contradictory results on the mediating roles of two dimensions of trust between transformational leadership and employee outcomes. J Org Eff People Perform. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-11-2016-0063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkinen H (2016) Review of empirical research on knowledge management practices and firm performance. J Knowl Manag 20(2):230–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iranzadeh S, Pakdelbonab M (2014) Investigating the role of knowledge management implementation in labor productivity in Islamic Azad University Tabriz Branch. Prod Manag 7(28):51–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayachandran S, Hewett K, Kaufman P (2004) Customer response capability in a sense-and-respond era: the role of customer knowledge process. J Acad Market Sci 32(3):219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang X, Li Y (2009) An empirical investigation of knowledge management and innovative performance: the case of alliances. Res Policy 38(2):358–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kianto A, Vanhala M, Heilmann P (2016) The impact of knowledge management on job satisfaction. J Knowl Manag 20(4):621–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivipõld K (2015) Organizational leadership capability–a mechanism of knowledge coordination for inducing innovative behaviour: a case study in Estonian service industries. Balt J Manag 10(4):478–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingebiel R, Rammer C (2014) Resource allocation strategy for innovation portfolio management. Strateg Manag J 35(2):246–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane PJ, Koka BR, Pathak S (2006) The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Acad Manag Rev 31(4):833–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Choi B (2003) Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. J Manag Inf Syst 20(1):179–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee VH, Leong LY, Hew TS, Ooi KB (2013) Knowledge management: a key determinant in advancing technological innovation? J Knowl Manag 17(6):848–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner D, Amick BC, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cyn D (2001) The work limitations questionnaire. Med Care 39(1):72–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C, Hung HC, Wu JY, Lin B (2002) A knowledge management architecture in collaborative supply chain. J Comput Inf Syst 42(5):83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Meroño-Cerdán AL, López-Nicolás C (2017) Innovation objectives as determinants of organizational innovations. Innovation 19(2):208–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro AP, Soares AM, Rua OL (2017) Linking intangible resources and export performance: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and dynamic capabilities. Balt J Manag 12(3):329–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson PF, Humphrey SF (2006) The work design questionnaire (WDQ): developing and valiadating a comprehensive measure for job design and nature of work. J Appl Psychol 91(6):1321–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair N, Vohra N (2010) An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers. Manag Decis 48(4):600–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Org Sci 5(1):14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ologbo AC, Nor KM, Okyere-Kwakye E (2015) The Influence of knowledge sharing on employee innovation capabilities. Int J Hum Resour Stud 5(3):102–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacios D, Gil I, Garrigos F (2009) The impact of knowledge management on innovation and entrepreneurship in the biotechnology and telecommunications industries. Small Bus Econ 32(3):291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plum K, Mawson A, Johnson J (2017) Measuring and managing the workplace for knowledge worker productivity. Corp Real Estate J 6(4):336–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing andcomparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 40(3):879–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramezan M (2012) Measuring the knowledge productivity: a comprehensive study of knowledge workers in Iranian industrial organizations. Educ Bus Soc Contemp Middle Eastern Issues 5(3):200–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shang SS, Yao CY, Liou DM (2015) The effects of knowledge interaction for business innovation. R&D Manag 47(3):337–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shujahat M, Hussain S, Javed S, Thurasamy R, Ali J (2017a) Strategic management model with lens of knowledge management and competitive intelligence: a review approach. VINE J Inf Knowl Manag Syst 47(1):55–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shujahat M, Sousa MJ, Hussain S, Nawaz F, Wang M, Umer M (2017b) Translating the impact of knowledge management processes into knowledge-based innovation: the neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity. J Bus Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syazwan Abdullah M, Kimble C, Benest I, Paige R (2006) Knowledge-based systems: a re-evaluation. J Knowl Manag 10(3):127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangen S (2005) Demystifying productivity and performance. Int J Prod Perform Manag 54(1):34–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas BE, Baron JP (1994) Evaluating knowledge worker productivity: literature review. Interim Report, No. FF-94/27, USACERL, pp 1–27. www.cecer.army.mil/kws/tho_lit.htm#abs

  • Tsekouras G, Poulis E, Poulis K (2011) Innovation and dynamic capabilities in a traditional service sector: evidence from shipping companies. Balt J Manag 6(3):320–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng FC, Fan YJ (2011) Exploring the influence of organizational ethical climate on knowledge management. J Bus Ethics 101(2):325–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turriago-Hoyos A, Thoene U, Arjoon S (2016) Knowledge workers and virtues in Peter Drucker’s management theory. SAGE Open 6(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CL, Ahmed PK (2004) The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. Eur J Innov Manag 7(4):303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong KKK (2013) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Market Bull 24(1):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright M, Tartari V, Huang KG, Di Lorenzo F, Bercovitz J (2018) Knowledge worker mobility in context: pushing the boundaries of theory and methods. J Manag Stud 55(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S, Zhang W, Du J (2011) Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and innovation in networked environments. J Knowl Manag 15(6):1035–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Attock Campus, Attock, Pakistan

    Muhammad Ali Butt

  2. The Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Attock Campus, Attock, Pakistan

    Faisal Nawaz, Saddam Hussain & Muhammad Shujahat

  3. CIEO - Algarve University and BRU - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

    Maria José Sousa

  4. KM&EL Lab, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong

    Minhong Wang

  5. The Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong

    Muhammad Saleem Sumbal

Authors
  1. Muhammad Ali Butt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Faisal Nawaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saddam Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria José Sousa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Minhong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Muhammad Saleem Sumbal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Muhammad Shujahat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Shujahat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Butt, M.A., Nawaz, F., Hussain, S. et al. Individual knowledge management engagement, knowledge-worker productivity, and innovation performance in knowledge-based organizations: the implications for knowledge processes and knowledge-based systems. Comput Math Organ Theory 25, 336–356 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-018-9270-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-018-9270-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation