Abstract
A major challenge in agent-based modelling is the management of the process to generate executable simulations from the initial conceptual models. This process is complex and usually involves several roles, which may raise communication problems due to the diverse backgrounds and perspectives of participants and the use of non-explicit knowledge. This situation demands a clear separation and precise definition of the multiple aspects of the process, in order to facilitate their understanding, grasp their relationships and develop them. This paper addresses this goal with a fine-step refinement process for information based on the use of domain-specific languages. It considers analysis contexts that include a particular theoretical framework, domain, type of problem and target platform. For a given context, the process formally defines modelling languages conceptually close to the different aspects relevant to it. It also defines mappings between concepts in those languages. Researchers develop simulations by specifying models with the languages, and share and refine information by using mappings between these models. This infrastructure provides guidance throughout the process and makes the information involved explicit. A case study of continuous double auctions illustrates the approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
Available at http://grasia.fdi.ucm.es/.
Available at http://grasia.fdi.ucm.es/.
References
Amouroux E, Chu T, Boucher A, Drogoul A (2009) GAMA: an environment for implementing and running spatially explicit multi-agent simulations. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5044:359–371
Axtell R, Epstein J (1994) Agent-based modeling: understanding our creations. Bull St Fe Inst 9:28–32
Bernon C, Camps V, Gleizes M, Picard G (2005) Engineering adaptive multi-agent systems: the ADELFE methodology. In: Henderson-Sellers B, Giorgini P (eds) Agent-oriented methodologies. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, pp 172–202
Brenner T (2006) Agent learning representation: advice on modelling economic learning. Handbook Comput Econ 2:895–947
Czarnecki K, Helsen S (2003) Classification of model transformation approaches. In: Proceedings of the 2nd OOPSLA workshop on generative techniques in the context of the model driven architecture, pp 1–17
Drogoul A, Vanbergue D, Meurisse T (2003) Multi-agent based simulation: where are the agents? Lect Notes Comput Sci 2581:1–15
Eclipse M2M Project (2011) The ATLAS transformation language (ATL), v3.2.0. http://www.eclipse.org/atl/. Accessed 1 December 2011
Eclipse TMF Project (2011) Xtext, v2.0.0. http://www.eclipse.org/Xtext/. Accessed 1 December 2011
Edmonds B (2001) The use of models—making MABS actually work. Lect Notes Artif Intell 1979:15–32
France R, Rumpe B (2007) Model-driven development of complex software: a research roadmap. In: 2007 Future of software engineering, proceedings of the 2007 future of software engineering (FOSE 2007). IEEE Comput Soc, Los Alamitos, pp 37–54
Fuentes-Fernández R, Gómez-Sanz J, Pavón J (2009) Requirements elicitation and analysis of multiagent systems using activity theory. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part A 39(2):282–298
Galán J, Izquierdo L, Izquierdo S, Santos J, del Olmo R, López-Paredes A, Edmonds B (2009) Errors and artefacts in agent-based modelling. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 12(1):1
García-Magariño I, Rougemaille S, Fuentes-Fernández R, Migeon F, Gleizes M, Gómez-Sanz J (2009) A tool for generating model transformations by-example in multi-agent systems. Adv Soft Comput 55:70–79
García-Magariño I, Fuentes-Fernández R, Gómez-Sanz J (2010) A framework for the definition of metamodels for computer-aided software engineering tools. Inf Softw Technol 52(4):422–435
Gilbert G, Troitzsch K (2005) Simulation for the social scientist. Open University Press, Buckingham
Gode D, Sunder S (1993a) Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. J Polit Econ 101(1):119–137
Gode D, Sunder S (1993b) Lower bounds for efficiency of surplus extraction in double auctions. In: Friedman D, Rust J (eds) Proceedings of the double auction market: institutions, theories, and evidence, Santa Fe Institute, vol XV, pp 199–219
Henderson-Sellers B, Giorgini P (eds) (2005) Agent-oriented methodologies. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey
Lorscheid I, Heine B, Meyer M (2011) Opening the black box of simulations: increased transparency and effective communication through the systematic design of experiments. Comput Math Organ Theory. doi:10.1007/s10588-011-9097-3, pp 1–41
Luke S, Cioffi-Revilla C, Panait L, Sullivan K, Balan G (2005) MASON: a multiagent simulation environment. Simulation 81(7):517–527
Mernik M, Heering J, Sloane A (2005) When and how to develop domain-specific languages. ACM Comput Surv 37(4):316–344
Moore B, Dean D, Gerber A, Wagenknecht G, Vanderheyden P (2004) Eclipse development using the graphical editing framework and the eclipse modeling framework. IBM Redbooks
North M, Collier N, Vos J (2006) Experiences creating three implementations of the repast agent modeling toolkit. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul 16(1):25
OMG (2009) UML, unified modeling language superstructure, version 2.2 (February 2009). http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/. Accessed 1 December 2011
Pavón J, Gómez-Sanz J, Fuentes R (2005) The INGENIAS methodology and tools. In: Henderson-Sellers B, Giorgini P (eds) Agent-oriented methodologies. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, pp 236–276
Polhill J, Parker D, Brown D, Grimm V (2008) Using the ODD protocol for describing three agent-based social simulation models of land-use change. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 11(2):3
Posada M (2008) Emissions permits auctions: an agent based model analysis. In: Social simulation: technologies, advances and new discoveries, pp 180–191. IGI global
Posada M, López-Paredes A (2008) How to choose the bidding strategy in continuous double auctions: imitation versus take-the-best heuristics. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 11(1):6
Repast (2008) Repast Symphony 1.2. http://repast.sourceforge.net. Accessed 1 December 2011
Richiardi M, Leombruni R, Saam N, Sonnessa M (2006) A common protocol for agent-based social simulation. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 9(1):15
Sansores C, Pavón J (2005) Agent-based simulation replication: a model driven architecture approach. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3789:244–253
Smith V (1982) Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. Am Econ Rev 72(5):923–955
Tesfatsion L (2006) Agent-based computational economics: a constructive approach to economic theory. Handbook Comput Econ 2:831–880
Weiss G (ed) (1999) Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge
Wilensky U, Rand W (2007) Making models match: replicating an agent-based model. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 10(4):2
XJ Technologies (2010) AnyLogic 6.5. http://www.xjtek.com/. Accessed 1 December 2011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuentes-Fernández, R., Hassan, S., Pavón, J. et al. Metamodels for role-driven agent-based modelling. Comput Math Organ Theory 18, 91–112 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-012-9110-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-012-9110-5