Do we self-regulate actions or perceptions? A test of two computational models | Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Do we self-regulate actions or perceptions? A test of two computational models

  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-regulation theories in applied psychology disagree about whether action or perceptions are the focus of regulation. Computational models based on the two conceptualizations were constructed and simulated. In one scenario, they performed identically and in conjunction with participants in a study of the goal-level effect (Vancouver et al., Organ Res Methods 8:100–127, 2005). In another scenario they created differentiating predictions and only the computational model based on the self-regulation of perceptions matched the data of participants. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Org Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR (1983) The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1991) Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Org Behav Hum Decis Process 50:248–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (2005) The primacy of self-regulation in health promotion. Appl Psychol Int Rev 54:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A, Locke E (2003) Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. J Appl Psychol 88:87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister RF (1998) The self. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST (eds) The handbook of social psychology, 4th edn, vol 1. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 680–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister RF (2001) Ego depletion, the executive function, and self-control. In: Roberts BW, Hogan R (eds) Personality psychology in the workplace. Am Psychol Assoc, Washington, pp 299–316

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister RF, Heatherton TF (1996) Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychol Inq 7:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister RF, Vohs KD (eds) (2004) Handbook of self-regulation: research, theory, and applications. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermúdez J (2006) Personality science, self-regulation, and health behavior: comment. Appl Psychol Int Rev 55:386–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts M, Maes S, Karoly P (2005) Self-regulation across domains of applied psychology: Is there an emerging consensus? Appl Psychol Int Rev 54:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts M, Pintrich PR, Zeidner M (eds) (2000) Handbook of self-regulation. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW (1992) Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver C, Scheier M (1998) On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervone D, Shadel WG, Smith RE, Fiori M (2006) Self-regulation: Reminders and suggestions from personality science. Appl Psychol Int Rev 55:333–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLosh EL, Busemeyer JR, McDaniel MA (1997) Extrapolation: The Sine Qua Non for abstraction in function learning. J Exper Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 23:968–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan JJ (2002) Work motivation. In: Anderson N, Ones DS, Sinangil HK, Viswesvaran C (eds) The handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 53–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagacinski RJ, Flach JM (2003) Control theory for humans: Quantitative approaches to modeling performance. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan MI, Rumelhart DE (1992) Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cogn Sci 16:307–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer FH (1970) Self-regulation: Research, issues, and speculation. In: Neuringer C, Michael JL (eds) Behavior modification in clinical psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 178–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer R (2005) Self-regulation research in work and I/O psychology. Appl Psychol Int Rev 54:186–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer R, Ackerman PL (1989) Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. J Appl Psychol 74:657–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluger AN, DeNisi A (1996) The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 119:254–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham GP, Locke EA (1991) Self-regulation through goal setting. Org Behav Hum Decis Process 50:212–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham GP, Pinder CC (2005) Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the 21st Century. Annu Rev Psychol 55:485–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA (1991) Goal theory vs. control theory: Contrasting approaches to understanding work motivation. Motiv Emot 15:9–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA (1994) The emperor is naked. Appl Psychol Int Rev 43:367–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA (1996) Motivation through conscious goal setting. Appl Prev Psychol 5:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA (2000) Motivation, cognition, and action: An analysis of studies of task goals and knowledge. Appl Psychol Int Rev 49:408–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Am Psychol 57:705–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA, Latham GP (2004) What should we do about work motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Acad Manage Rev 29:388–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord RG, Levy PE (1994) Moving from cognition to action: A control theory perspective. Appl Psychol Int Rev 43:335–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mento AJ, Steel RP, Karren RJ (1987) A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966–1984. Org Behav Hum Decis Process 39:52–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel W (1996) From good intentions to willpower. In: Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (eds) The psychology of action. Guilford, New York, pp 197–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel W (2004) Toward an integrative science of the person. Annu Rev Psychol 55:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell A (1990) Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt MA, Myung IJ, Zhang S (2002) Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. Psychol Rev 109:472–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers WT (1973) Behavior: The control of perception. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor RW, Dutta A (1995) Skill acquisition and human performance. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1992) What is an “explanation” of behavior? Psychol Sci 3:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner BF (1968) The technology of teaching. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui AS, Ashford SJ (1994) Adaptive self-regulation: A process view of managerial effectiveness. J Manage 20:93–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver JB (2000) Self-regulation in organizational settings: A tale of two paradigms. In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich P, Zeidner M (eds) Handbook of self-regulation. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 303–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver JB (2005) The depth of history and explanation as benefit and bane for psychological control theories. J Appl Psychol 90:38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver JB, Day DV (2005) Industrial and organization research on self-regulation: From constructs to applications. Appl Psychol Int Rev 54:155–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver JB, Putka DJ (2000) Analyzing goal-striving processes and a test of the generalizability of perceptual control theory. Org Behav Hum Decis Process 82:334–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver JB, Putka DP, Scherbaum CA (2005) Triangulating on the goal-level effect: Experimental, computational, and correlational analysis. Organ Res Meth 8:100–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood R (2005) New frontiers for self-regulation research in IO psychology. Appl Psychol Int Rev 54:192–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Ohio University, 200 Porter Hall, Athens, OH, 45701, USA

    Jeffrey B. Vancouver

  2. Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, NY, 10075, USA

    Charles A. Scherbaum

Authors
  1. Jeffrey B. Vancouver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Charles A. Scherbaum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey B. Vancouver.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vancouver, J.B., Scherbaum, C.A. Do we self-regulate actions or perceptions? A test of two computational models. Comput Math Organiz Theor 14, 1–22 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-008-9021-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-008-9021-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation