Teaching robots to cooperate with humans in dynamic manipulation tasks based on multi-modal human-in-the-loop approach | Autonomous Robots Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Teaching robots to cooperate with humans in dynamic manipulation tasks based on multi-modal human-in-the-loop approach

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

We propose an approach to efficiently teach robots how to perform dynamic manipulation tasks in cooperation with a human partner. The approach utilises human sensorimotor learning ability where the human tutor controls the robot through a multi-modal interface to make it perform the desired task. During the tutoring, the robot simultaneously learns the action policy of the tutor and through time gains full autonomy. We demonstrate our approach by an experiment where we taught a robot how to perform a wood sawing task with a human partner using a two-person cross-cut saw. The challenge of this experiment is that it requires precise coordination of the robot’s motion and compliance according to the partner’s actions. To transfer the sawing skill from the tutor to the robot we used Locally Weighted Regression for trajectory generalisation, and adaptive oscillators for adaptation of the robot to the partner’s motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Stiffness is the inverse of compliance.

  2. Error is equal to the difference between the demonstrated (desired) and learnt performance.

References

  • Adorno, B. V., Bo, A. P. L., Fraisse, P., & Poignet, P. (2011). Towards a cooperative framework for interactive manipulation involving a human and a humanoid. In 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) (pp. 3777–3783).

  • Ajoudani, A., Tsagarakis, N. G., & Bicchi, A. (2012). Tele-impedance: Teleoperation with impedance regulation using a body-machine interface. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 31(13), 1642–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argall, B. D., & Billard, A. (2010). A survey of tactile human–robot interactions. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 58(10), 1159–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argall, B. D., Chernova, S., Veloso, M., & Browning, B. (2009). A survey of robot learning from demonstration. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 57(5), 469–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkeson, C. G., Hale, J. G., Pollick, F., Riley, M., Kotosaka, S., Schaal, S., et al. (2000). Using humanoid robots to study human behavior. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 15(4), 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babič, J., Hale, J. G., & Oztop, E. (2011). Human sensorimotor learning for humanoid robot skill synthesis. Adaptive Behavior—Animals, Animats, Software Agents, Robots, Adaptive Systems, 19, 250–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben Amor, H., Berger, E., Vogt, D., & Jung, B. (2009). Kinesthetic bootstrapping: Teaching motor skills to humanoid robots through physical interaction. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual German conference on advances in artificial intelligence, KI’09 (pp. 492–499). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Ben Amor, H., Saxena, A., Kroemer, O., & Peters, J. (2012). Workshop: Beyond robot grasping—Modern approaches for learning dynamic manipulation. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems.

  • Billard, A., Calinon, S., Dillmann, R., & Schaal, S. (2008). Robot programming by demonstration. In B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Eds.), Springer handbook of robotics (pp. 1371–1394). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burdet, E., Osu, R., Franklin, D. W., Milner, T. E., & Kawato, M. (2001). The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature, 414(6862), 446–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaverini, S. (1997). Singularity-robust task-priority redundancy resolution for real-time kinematic control of robot manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 13(3), 399–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Santis, A., Siciliano, B., De Luca, A., & Bicchi, A. (2008). An atlas of physical human–robot interaction. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 43(3), 253–270.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Edsinger, A., & Kemp, C. C. (2007). Human–robot interaction for cooperative manipulation: Handing objects to one another. In The 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (2007) (pp. 1167–1172).

  • Evrard, P., Gribovskaya, E., Calinon, S., Billard, A., & Kheddar, A. (2009). Teaching physical collaborative tasks: object-lifting case study with a humanoid. In IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots (pp. 399–404).

  • Franklin, D. W., Burdet, E., Osu, R., Kawato, M., & Milner, T. (2003a). Functional significance of stiffness in adaptation of multijoint arm movements to stable and unstable dynamics. Experimental Brain Research, 151(2), 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, D. W., Osu, R., Burdet, E., Kawato, M., & Milner, T. E. (2003b). Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 3270–3282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gams, A., Ijspeert, A. J., Schaal, S., & Lenarčič, J. (2009). On-line learning and modulation of periodic movements with nonlinear dynamical systems. Autonomous Robots, 27(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gams, A., Petric, T., Ude, A., & Zlajpah, L. (2012). Performing periodic tasks: On-line learning, adaptation and synchronization with external signals. In R. Zaier (Ed.), The future of humanoid robots—research and applications (pp. 1–28). InTech.

  • Haykin, S. (1999). Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hersch, M., Guenter, F., Calinon, S., & Billard, A. (2008). Dynamical system modulation for robot learning via kinesthetic demonstrations. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24(6), 1463–1467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ijspeert, A. J., Nakanishi, J., & Schaal, S. (2002). Movement imitation with nonlinear dynamical systems in humanoid robots. In Proceedings 2002 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (vol. 2, pp. 1398–1403).

  • Ikemoto, S., Ben Amor, H., Minato, T., Jung, B., & Ishiguro, H (2012). Physical human–robot interaction: Mutual learning and adaptation. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine, 19(4), 24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kober, J., Wilhelm, A., Oztop, E., & Peters, J. (2012). Reinforcement learning to adjust parametrized motor primitives to new situations. Autonomous Robots, 33(4), 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kormushev, P., Calinon, S., & Caldwell, D. G. (2011). Imitation learning of positional and force skills demonstrated via kinesthetic teaching and haptic input. Advanced Robotics, 25(5), 581–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, P., Wimböck, T., Artigas, J., Schätzle, S., Jöhl, K., Schmidt, F., et al. (2009). Multimodal telepresent control of dlr’s rollin’ justin. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, ICRA’09 (pp. 3096–3097). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.

  • Kroemer, O. B., Detry, R., Piater, J., & Peters, J. (2010). Combining active learning and reactive control for robot grasping. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 58(9), 1105–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushida, D., Nakamura, M., Goto, S., & Kyura, N. (2001). Human direct teaching of industrial articulated robot arms based on force-free control. Artificial Life and Robotics, 5(1), 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lallee, S., Yoshida, E., Mallet, A., Nori, F., Natale, L., Metta, G., et al. (2010). Human–robot cooperation based on interaction learning. In O. Sigaud & J. Peters (Eds.), From motor learning to interaction learning in robots volume 264 of studies in computational intelligence (pp. 491–536). Berlin: Springer.

  • Maciejewski, A. A., & Klein, C. A. (1985). Obstacle avoidance for kinematically redundant manipulators in dynamically varying environments. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 4(3), 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B., & Oztop, E. (2012). Robotic grasping and manipulation through human visuomotor learning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 60(3), 441–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muelling, K., Kober, J., Kroemer, O., & Peters, J. (2012). Learning to select and generalize striking movements in robot table tennis. In AAAI fall symposium series.

  • Niemeyer, G., Preusche, C., & Hirzinger, G. (2008). Telerobotics. In B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Eds.), Springer handbook of robotics (pp. 741–757). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Osu, R., & Gomi, H. (1999). Multijoint muscle regulation mechanism examined by measured human arm stiffness and emg signals. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 1458–1468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oztop, E., Lin, L.-H., Kawato, M., & Cheng, G. (2006). Dexterous skills transfer by extending human body schema to a robotic hand. In 2006 6th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots (pp. 82–87).

  • Peternel, L., & Babič, J. (2013a). Humanoid robot posture-control learning in real-time based on human sensorimotor learning ability. In 2013 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 5309–5314).

  • Peternel, L., & Babič, J. (2013b). Learning of compliant human–robot interaction using full-body haptic interface. Advanced Robotics, 27(13), 1003–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrič, T., Gams, A., Ijspeert, A. J., & Žlajpah, L. (2011). On-line frequency adaptation and movement imitation for rhythmic robotic tasks. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 30(14), 1775–1788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning. International Journal of Neural Systems, 14(2), 69–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauser, E. L., Argall, B. D., Metta, G., & Billard, A. G. (2012). Iterative learning of grasp adaptation through human corrections. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 60(1), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, S. (1999). Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, S., & Atkeson, C. G. (1998). Constructive incremental learning from only local information. Neural Computation, 10(8), 2047–2084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selen, L. P. J., Beek, P. J., & van Dieëbn, J. H. (2005). Can co-activation reduce kinematic variability? A simulation study. Biological Cybernetics, 93(5), 373–381.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tsumugiwa, T., Yokogawa, R., & Hara, K. (2002). Variable impedance control with virtual stiffness for human-robot cooperative peg-in-hole task. In 2002 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (vol. 2, pp. 1075–1081).

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank L. Žlajpah for discussions and for providing us with the robot control infrastructure. This work was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency, programme P2-0076 and grant J2-2272, and the Slovenian Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Automation, Biocybernetics and Robotics, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova cesta 39, 1000 , Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Luka Peternel, Tadej Petrič & Jan Babič

  2. Computer Science, Özyeğin University, Nisantepe Mah. Orman Sok. No:13, 34794 , Alemdag, Cekmekoy, Istanbul, Turkey

    Erhan Oztop

Authors
  1. Luka Peternel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tadej Petrič
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erhan Oztop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jan Babič
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luka Peternel.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (mpg 25622 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peternel, L., Petrič, T., Oztop, E. et al. Teaching robots to cooperate with humans in dynamic manipulation tasks based on multi-modal human-in-the-loop approach. Auton Robot 36, 123–136 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-013-9361-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-013-9361-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation