Abstract
This paper proposes a definition of categorical model of the deep inference system BV, defined by Guglielmi. Deep inference introduces the idea of performing a deduction in the interior of a formula, at any depth. Traditional sequent calculus rules only see the roots of formulae. However in these new systems, one can rewrite at any position in the formula tree. Deep inference in particular allows the syntactic description of logics for which there is no sequent calculus. One such system is BV, which extends linear logic to include a noncommutative self-dual connective. This is the logic our paper proposes to model. Our definition is based on the notion of a linear functor, due to Cockett and Seely. A BV-category is a linearly distributive category, possibly with negation, with an additional tensor product which, when viewed as a bivariant functor, is linear with a degeneracy condition. We show that this simple definition implies all of the key isomorphisms of the theory. We consider Girard’s category of probabilistic coherence spaces and show that it contains a self-dual monoidal structure in addition to the *-autonomous structure exhibited by Girard. This structure makes the category a BV-category. We believe this structure is also of independent interest, as well-behaved noncommutative operators generally are.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramsky, S., Blute, R., Panangaden, P.: Nuclear and trace ideals in tensored *-categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 143, 3–47 (2000)
Barr, M.: *-autonomous Categories. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 752 (1980)
Blute, R., Cockett, J.R.B., Seely, R.A.G., Trimble, T.: Natural deduction and coherence for weakly distributive categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 13, 229–296 (1996)
Blute, R., Ivanov, I., Panangaden, P.: Discrete quantum causal dynamics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 42, 2025–2041 (2003)
Brünner, K.: Deep inference and symmetry in classical proofs. Ph.D. thesis, Dresden Technical University (2003)
Cockett, J.R.B., Seely, R.A.G.: Weakly distributive categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 114, 133–173 (1997)
Cockett, J.R.B., Seely, R.A.G.: Proof theory for full intuitionistic linear logic, bilinear logic, and MIX categories. Theory Appl. Categ. 5, 85–131 (1997)
Cockett, J.R.B., Seely, R.A.G.: Linearly distributive functors. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 143, 155–203 (1999)
Danos, V., Ehrhard, T.: On Probabilistic Coherence Spaces (2008, preprint)
Danos, V., Harmer, R.: Probabilistic Games Semantics. In: Proceedings of Logic in Computer Science (2000)
Ehrhard, T.: Finiteness spaces. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 15, 615–646 (2005)
Ehrhard, T.: On Köthe sequence spaces and linear logic. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 12, 579–623 (2001)
Führmann, C., Pym, D.: On categorical models of classical logic and the geometry of interaction. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 17, 957–1027 (2007)
Girard, J.-Y.: Linear logic. Theor. Comp. Sci. 50, 1–102 (1987)
Girard, J.Y.: Between logic and quantic: a tract. In: Ehrhard, T., et al. (eds.) Linear Logic in Computer Science. Cambridge University Press (2003)
Guglielmi, A.: A system of interaction and structure. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 8(1:1), 1–64 (2007)
Hughes, D.: Deep inference proof theory equals categorical proof theory minus coherence (2004, preprint)
Hyland, M., Schalk, A.: Glueing and orthogonality for models of linear logic. Theor. Comp. Sci. 294, 183–231 (2003)
Lamarche, F.: Exploring the gap between linear and classical logic. Theory Appl. Categ. 18, 473–535 (2007)
McKinley, R.: Classical categories and deep inference (2005, preprint)
Melliés, P.-A.: Double categories: a modular model of multiplicative linear logic. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 12, 449–479 (2002)
Retoré, C.: Pomset logic: a non-commutative extension of classical linear logic. In: Proceedings of TLCA’97. LNCS, vol. 1210, pp. 300–318 (1997)
Seely, R.A.G.: Linear logic, *-autonomous categories and cofree coalgebras. Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 92. American Mathematical Society (1989)
Strassburger, L.: On the axiomatisation of boolean categories with and without medial. Theory Appl. Categ. 18, 536–601 (2007)
Tiu, A.: A system of interaction and structure II: the need for deep inference. Logical Methods in Computer Science 2, 1–24 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Research supported in part by National Science and Engineering Research Council, Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blute, R., Panangaden, P. & Slavnov, S. Deep Inference and Probabilistic Coherence Spaces. Appl Categor Struct 20, 209–228 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10485-010-9241-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10485-010-9241-0